본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

評価に用いられた「ね」と「よね」の配慮機能

Function of Consideration of sentence-final particle 「ne」 and 「yone」 using in evaluation.

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This thesis is about the usage of evaluation among various usages of sentencefinalparticle 「ne」 and 「yone」 in view of politeness. As a result of the research,sentence-final particle 「ne」 and 「yone」 have the function of consideration forlisteners in common; however, there are subtle differences between them. In case of <compliment>, the usage of sentence-final particle 「ne」 is preferredover 「yone」. It has something to do with the fact that the usage of 「yone」 is restrictedin the same way found in the example sentence (2). In some cases, it is found that「yone」 is used when the speaker re-evaluates the listener, which makes differencewith the usage of 「ne」. In case of <condemnation>, 「yona」 is used instead of 「yone」. When eitherpostposition 「ne」 or 「yone」 is used with adverb 「yoku」 (which is an ironicalexpression), or adverb 「mo」 (which is a euphemistic expression), the negativeevaluation can be delivered in a roundabout way. This is associated with Leech'stheory 「approbation maxim」.

Abstract

This thesis is about the usage of evaluation among various usages of sentencefinalparticle 「ne」 and 「yone」 in view of politeness. As a result of the research,sentence-final particle 「ne」 and 「yone」 have the function of consideration forlisteners in common; however, there are subtle differences between them. In case of <compliment>, the usage of sentence-final particle 「ne」 is preferredover 「yone」. It has something to do with the fact that the usage of 「yone」 is restrictedin the same way found in the example sentence (2). In some cases, it is found that「yone」 is used when the speaker re-evaluates the listener, which makes differencewith the usage of 「ne」. In case of <condemnation>, 「yona」 is used instead of 「yone」. When eitherpostposition 「ne」 or 「yone」 is used with adverb 「yoku」 (which is an ironicalexpression), or adverb 「mo」 (which is a euphemistic expression), the negativeevaluation can be delivered in a roundabout way. This is associated with Leech'stheory 「approbation maxim」.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. "できちゃった結婚", フジテレビ, ~
  2. "HERO", フジテレビ, ~
  3. 唯川恵, "肩ごしの恋人" (2004), 集英社文庫
  4. 森瑶子, "恋のインデックス" (1988), 角川文庫
  5. 林真理子, "最終便に間に合えば" (1988), 文春文庫
  6. 山村正夫, "殺人レッスン休講中" (1987), 角川文庫
  7. 井上ひさし, "四捨五入殺人事件" (1984), 新潮社
  8. 星新一, "ボッコちゃん" (1971), 新潮社
  9. 林真理子, "街角に投げキッス" (1984), 文春文庫
  10. 林真理子, "美女のトーキョー偏差値" (2003), 角川文庫
  11. 伊豆原英子, "終助詞『よ』『よね』『ね』の総合的考察―『よね』のコミュニケーション機能の考察を軸に―", 日本語․日本文化論集, 1, pp.21~34 (1993), 名古屋大学
  12. 大曽美恵子, "誤用分析Ⅰ『今日はいい天気ですね。』―『はい、そうです。』", 日本語学, 5(9), pp.91~94 (1986), 明治書院
  13. 金水敏, "終助詞ヨ․ネ", 月刊言語, 22(4), pp.118~121 (1993), 大修館書店
  14. 金玉任, "終助詞「ね」の機能―「評価文と「ね」―", 日本語学研究, 15, pp.25~38 (2006), 韓国日本語学会
  15. 김옥임, "終助詞「よね」の機能", 일본언어문화, (16), pp.107~126 (2010), 한국일본언어문화학회
  16. 下山千秋, "文末における『よね』―『ね』と比較しながら―", ことばの科学, 8, pp.51~66 (1995), 名古屋大学言語文化学部
  17. 陳常好, "終助詞―話し手と聞き手の認識のギャップをうめるための文接辞", 日本語学, 6(10), pp.93~109 (1987), 明治書院
  18. 野田春美, "終助詞の機能, In 新日本語文法選書4モダリティ", pp.261~273 (2002), くろしお出版
  19. 蓮沼昭子, "対話における確認行為―『だろう』『じゃないか』『よね』の確認用法 ―, In 複文の研究(下)", pp.389~419 (1995), くろしお出版
  20. 深尾まどか, "『よね』再考―人称と共起制限から―", 日本語教育, 125, pp.18~27 (2005), 日本語教育学会
  21. 宮崎和人, "確認要求表現の体系性", 日本語教育, 106, pp.7~16 (2000)
  22. 宮崎和人, "終助詞"ね"と"な"", 大阪日本語研究, 14, pp.1~19 (2002)
  23. 山岡政紀, "コミュニケーションと配慮表現", pp.30~38 (2010), 明治書院
  24. 吉田雅昭, "終助詞『ヨネ⋅ヨナ』の機能⋅意味について", 言語科学論集, 12, pp.37~48 (2008)
  25. Brown P., "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  26. Grice H. P, "Logic and Conversation, In Cole and Morgan", pp.41~58 (1975)
  27. Leech G. N, "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)