語種から見た日本語と韓国語の新語に 関する対照研究 -混種語における造語成分の語種と造語パターン-
A study on the comparison of new words between Japanese and Korean in terms of word type : word type and pattern of word compound of the constituent elements of compound word on the loanblend
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, comparison between new words of Japanese and Korean from 2003to 2005 in terms of word type was carried out, especially, focusing in word typeand pattern of word compound of the constituent elements of compound word onthe loanblend. Word type of both Japanese and Korean consist of native words, Chinese words,foreign words, and loanblend, and loanblend tend to increase in recent new words. I realized that 「Chinese word + foreign word」 and 「Chinese word + native word」ismost coupling word type of loanblend in the case of the constituent elements orderwas ignored and coupling rate of Chinese word is highest. In the case of theconstituent elements order was considered, coupling type of 「foreign word + Chineseword」, 「native word + Chinese word」, 「Chinese word + foreign word」, 「Chineseword + Chinese word」, 「Chinese word + native word」 comprised a large proportionin coupling type of new words. And 「foreign word + Chinese word」, 「native word+ Chinese word」, 「Chinese word + foreign word」, 「Chinese word + native word」ismajor coupling type in new words. These are similarity between Japanese andKorean. First constituent elements in the new words of Korean shows similar ratio amongevery word type, whereas use of Chinese word is much in first constituent elementsin the new words of Japanese. Coupling type of Japanese and Korean is similar. However, proportion of eachcoupling type is quite different. This difference is expected to be a phenomenon dueto differences in components. I left this expectation as a future left.
Abstract
In this study, comparison between new words of Japanese and Korean from 2003to 2005 in terms of word type was carried out, especially, focusing in word typeand pattern of word compound of the constituent elements of compound word onthe loanblend. Word type of both Japanese and Korean consist of native words, Chinese words,foreign words, and loanblend, and loanblend tend to increase in recent new words. I realized that 「Chinese word + foreign word」 and 「Chinese word + native word」ismost coupling word type of loanblend in the case of the constituent elements orderwas ignored and coupling rate of Chinese word is highest. In the case of theconstituent elements order was considered, coupling type of 「foreign word + Chineseword」, 「native word + Chinese word」, 「Chinese word + foreign word」, 「Chineseword + Chinese word」, 「Chinese word + native word」 comprised a large proportionin coupling type of new words. And 「foreign word + Chinese word」, 「native word+ Chinese word」, 「Chinese word + foreign word」, 「Chinese word + native word」ismajor coupling type in new words. These are similarity between Japanese andKorean. First constituent elements in the new words of Korean shows similar ratio amongevery word type, whereas use of Chinese word is much in first constituent elementsin the new words of Japanese. Coupling type of Japanese and Korean is similar. However, proportion of eachcoupling type is quite different. This difference is expected to be a phenomenon dueto differences in components. I left this expectation as a future left.
참고문헌 (26)
- 稲垣吉彦, "現代の新語․流行語, In 講座日本語の語彙 第7巻 現代の語彙", pp.153~174 (1982), 明治書院
- 荻野綱男, "講座ITと日本語研究2アプリケーションソフトの基礎" (2011), 明治書院
- 加茂正一, "新語の考察" (1994), 三省堂
- 鈴木英夫, "私の新語観", 日本語学, 7(6), pp.4~7 (1988), 明治書院
- 玉村文郎, "和語は造語力が弱いか, In 語構成", pp.101~116 (1997), ひつじ書房
- 野村雅昭, "語種と造語力", 日本語学, 3(9), pp.40~54 (1984), 明治書院
- 野村雅昭, "造語法と造語力", 日本語学, 11(5), pp.4~7 (1992), 明治書院
- 橋本行洋, "どのような新語が定着しやすいか", 国文学‐解釈と素材の研究, 51(4), pp.46~49 (2006)
- 宮島達夫, "図説日本語", pp.582~583 (1982), 角川書店
- 米川明彦, "新語と流行語" (1989), 南雲堂
- 米川明彦, "新語と造語力", 日本語学, 11(5), pp.50~57 (1992), 明治書院
- 노명희, "최근 신어의 조어적 특징", 새국어생활, 16(4), pp.31~45 (2006)
- 문금현, "현대국어 신어(新語)의 유형 분류 및 생성 원리", 국어학, 33, pp.31~45 (1999), 국어학회
- 李賢正, "日本語と韓国語の新語の語種に関する対照-2002年の新語を中心に-", 日本語学研究, 33, pp.153~169 (2012), 韓国日本語学会
- 임지룡, "새 낱말 창조의 인지적 연구", 국어교육연구, 29, pp.201~233 (1977), 국어교육연구회
- 張元哉, "現代日韓語彙の対照研究", 日本学報, 55(1), pp.157~169 (2003), 韓国日本文化学会
- 張元哉, "語種から見た現代日韓語彙の意味分野", 日本文化学会, 21, pp.61~74 (2004), 韓国日本文化学会
- 전명미, "신어의 단어 형성법 연구-2002ㆍ2003ㆍ2004신어를 대상으로-", 韓民族語文学, 50, pp.37~70 (2007)
- 조남호, "어휘 사용 실태-신어를 중심으로-", 이화여자대학교 한국어 문학연구소학술대회, pp.22~30 (1995)
- 国立国語研究所, "現代語の語彙調査総合雑誌の用語後編" (1958), 国立国語研究所
- 自由国民社編集部, "現代用語の基礎知識" (2004), 自由国民社
- 松村明, "大辞泉" (1995), 小学館
- 山田俊雄他, "新潮現代国語辞典" (1985), 新潮社
- 국립국어원, "2003년신어" (2003), 국립국어연구원
- 국립국어원, "2004년신어" (2004), 국립국어연구원
- 국립국어원, "2005년신어" (2005), 국립국어연구원
