근대 한일 문・구어체에 나타난 어휘의 대조고찰 -대역코퍼스를 자료로-
A Contrastive Study of Modern Korean an Japanese Vocabularies in Literary and Colloquial Styles through Parallel Corpora
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this paper is to figure out the quantitative structures of the vocabularies of the modern Korean and Japanese. In order to accomplish the objective, I examine the parallel corpora of the literal and the colloquial styles. The main results are as follows:1) With regard to cumulative frequency, Korean and Japanese show quite a similar distribution in colloquial style, but some difference in literary style. Korean shows comparatively low cumulative frequency. 2) With regard to the composition of word origin, Korean and Japanese show more substantial differences in literary style than in colloquial style. In both colloquial and literary styles, Japanese has many native japanese words whereas Korean has many hybrid words. When it comes to styles, Korean has many sino-korean words in literary style whereas Japanese has many sino-japanese words in colloquial style. Also in literary style, Korean shows a trend of the increase of whole token because sino-korean words include high-frequency sino-korean words which has the characteristic of basic words like native japanese words in Japanese. 3) With regard to the composition of parts of speech, in both literary and colloquial styles, Japanese has comparatively many nouns, whereas Korean has comparatively many adjectives(verbs). This reflects the nominal-oriented structure of Japanese and the verbal-oriented structure of Korean.
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to figure out the quantitative structures of the vocabularies of the modern Korean and Japanese. In order to accomplish the objective, I examine the parallel corpora of the literal and the colloquial styles. The main results are as follows:1) With regard to cumulative frequency, Korean and Japanese show quite a similar distribution in colloquial style, but some difference in literary style. Korean shows comparatively low cumulative frequency. 2) With regard to the composition of word origin, Korean and Japanese show more substantial differences in literary style than in colloquial style. In both colloquial and literary styles, Japanese has many native japanese words whereas Korean has many hybrid words. When it comes to styles, Korean has many sino-korean words in literary style whereas Japanese has many sino-japanese words in colloquial style. Also in literary style, Korean shows a trend of the increase of whole token because sino-korean words include high-frequency sino-korean words which has the characteristic of basic words like native japanese words in Japanese. 3) With regard to the composition of parts of speech, in both literary and colloquial styles, Japanese has comparatively many nouns, whereas Korean has comparatively many adjectives(verbs). This reflects the nominal-oriented structure of Japanese and the verbal-oriented structure of Korean.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김무식, "16`7세기 국어 한자어의 비중과 그 특징-순천김씨 및 현풍곽씨 한글편지를 대상으로", 어문론총, (47), pp.251~276 (2007), 한국문학언어학회
- 김병철, "韓国近代翻訳文学史研究" (1975), 乙酉文化社
- 김영철, "개화기 국어연구" (1997), 경남대학교출판부
- 신중진, "개화기 신문과 잡지에 나타난 명사 어휘의 어종 분석", 우리말연구, (25), pp.243~281 (2009), 우리말학회
- 이종수, "한·일 번역 성서의 어휘 비교 연구 : 1900년 이후 간행된 「로마서」를 중심으로", 박사, 한일어문학비교학, pp.2010
- 鄭道世, "개화기 교과서의 어휘연구 : 1890년대 국어 교과서를 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1999
- 장원재, "조사단위의 길이와 현대한일어휘", 일본학보, (61), pp.261~276 (2004), 한국일본학회
- 장원재, "근현대 한일 비교・병렬코퍼스와 어휘연구, In 일본어학과 일본어교육" (2013), 제이엔씨
- 한영균, "文体 現代性 判別의 語彙的 準拠와 그 変化 -1890년대～1930년대논설문의 한자어 사용양상을 중심으로-", 口訣研究, (23) (2009), 구결학회
- 金恩愛, "日本語の名詞志向構造(nominal-oriented structure)と韓国語の動詞志向構造(verbal-oriented structure)", 朝鮮学報, (188) (2003), 朝鮮学会
- 国立国語研究所, "明治時代語の調査研究", 国立国語研究所年報, (13) (1963), 国立国語研究所
- 国立国語研究所, "明治時代語の調査研究", 国立国語研究所年報, (15) (1965), 国立国語研究所
- 国立国語研究所, "雑誌用語の変遷" (1987), 秀英出版
- 『明六雑誌コーパス』の語彙量, "近藤明日子", 国立国語研究所, ~, pp.国立国語研究所共同研究報告12-03 近代語コーパス設計のための文献言語研究成果報告書 (2012)
- 明治後期から大正期の語彙のレベルと語種-『太陽コーパス』の形態素 解析データによる-, "田中牧朗", 国立国語研究所, ~, pp.国立国語研究所共同研究報告12-03 近代語コー パス設計のための文献言語研究成果報告書 (2012)
- 張元哉, "19世紀末の韓国語における日本製漢語-日韓同形漢語の視点から-", 日本語科学, (8) (2000), 国立国語研究所
- 張元哉, "現代日韓両国語における漢語の形成と語彙交流", 国語学, 54(3) (2003), 国語学会
- 張元哉, "現代日韓語彙の対照研究-対訳コーパスを資料に", 日本学報, 55(1) (2003), 韓国日本学会
- 野村雅昭, "明治期落語速記の語彙構造", 早稲田日本語研究, (9) (2001), 早稲田大学日本語学会
- 飛田良文, "明治以後の語彙の変遷", 言語生活, (182) (1966), 筑摩書房
- 飛田良文, "現代漢語の源流", 言語生活, (259) (1973), 筑摩書房
- 明治初期東京人の階層と語種との関係-『安愚楽鍋』を中心に-, "飛田良文", 国立国語研究所, ~, pp.国立国語研究所報告62 研究報告集 1号 (1978)
- 矢野謙一, "朝鮮語の表現, In 応用言語学講座２ 外国語と日本語" (1986), 明治書院
- 李漢燮, "『西遊見聞』の漢字語について-日本から入った語を中心に-", 国語学, (141) (1985), 国語学会
- 李建志, "海を渡った人情噺-朝鮮開化期の文学『東閣寒梅』と「文七元結」-, In 江戸の文事" (2000), ぺりかん社
- 林八龍, "日本語と韓国語における表現構造の対照考察-日本語の名詞表現と韓国語 の動詞表現を中心として, In 宮地裕・敦子先生古希記念論集 日本語の研究" (1995), 明治書院