본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기리시탄 資料의 「愛」에 대하여-「天草平家」와 「天草イソポ」를 중심으로-

A Historical Study of 「Ai」 in Kirishitan Literature -The Centroid of 「Amakusa heike」 and 「Amakusa isob」-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

In this manuscript, for an integral consideration of a vocabulary transition, Amakusa heike and Amakusa isob are basically selected to discuss synonym of sentimental vocabulary “love(Ai)”, relating to “Tisechu” in Kirishitan literature. A sentimental vocabulary carries distinct characteristic of definition change in the comparison of others. According to Kirishitan documents, the great reasons are the written letters in Romans and an easily recognizable characteristic to precisely distinguish words. In those days, the document, such as Amakusa heike and Amakusa isob, became valuable to understand the depth of Japanese. The trends of historical transition are carefully summarized as below. In relation to “Tisechu”, “love(Ai)” appearance and the difference of definition are carefully examined. When Muromachi Kirishitan missionary confuted Christian love, it avoided Chinese character “love” definition. However, “God’s Love” and “Human’s Love” were considered to be applied in what actually explained their own definitions among procuring Tisechu’s Kotisechu and Koi letters. Along with “Love(Ai)”, “Koi”, “Tisechu”, and “Taiji” connection, “Taiji” has been apparently confirmed negative nuance after assessing the analysis of Kirishitan document examples. Those three letters are in case of point where it shows “Tisechu” and “Love(Ai)” are commonly classified as mankind and animals or else with description of love between genders. Unlikely, “Tisechu” essentially carries discrete definitions. For instance, “Tisechu” definition includes “value, precious, and significance.” However, “Koi”, “Tisechu”, and “Taiji” definitions actually enclose with “longing” “value and significance” “love and affection”. In addition, in order to justify the concept of love, “Ai” was pertinent, but in thereabout, Buddhism or Christian never presumes “God’s love” as similar as the concept of “Ai.”This indicated when the present Kirishitan missionary teaches God’s love, one of the great reasons for not being able to appoint “Ai” application is truly shown in Amakusa heike and Amakusa isob. According to their documents in Medieval Kirishitan documents and usage, it is recognized to avoid “Aisu” through God and to discern “Aisu” through a woman and animal. Thus, Kirishitans appended the new definition of “God’s love” to “Tisechu,” expressing “Koi” defined and expanded “A Gender Love,” which the concept of “Ai” was also manipulated under Chinese character “love,” called “Meiji” Including Medieval Kirishitan documents, “Ai” usage of definition and chronological changes were scrutinized. The result was a general change of vocabulary’s definition, leading to the phenomenon of expanding vocabulary’s definition change throughout dominant chronological, social period. As mentioned, in the course of definition change, the recognition of Japanese love was largely reflected to verbal facts as well. From this time forward, the previous and emotion lexicon will be our groundwork with expanding consideration and observing historical lexicon facts’ perspectives.

Abstract

In this manuscript, for an integral consideration of a vocabulary transition, Amakusa heike and Amakusa isob are basically selected to discuss synonym of sentimental vocabulary “love(Ai)”, relating to “Tisechu” in Kirishitan literature. A sentimental vocabulary carries distinct characteristic of definition change in the comparison of others. According to Kirishitan documents, the great reasons are the written letters in Romans and an easily recognizable characteristic to precisely distinguish words. In those days, the document, such as Amakusa heike and Amakusa isob, became valuable to understand the depth of Japanese. The trends of historical transition are carefully summarized as below. In relation to “Tisechu”, “love(Ai)” appearance and the difference of definition are carefully examined. When Muromachi Kirishitan missionary confuted Christian love, it avoided Chinese character “love” definition. However, “God’s Love” and “Human’s Love” were considered to be applied in what actually explained their own definitions among procuring Tisechu’s Kotisechu and Koi letters. Along with “Love(Ai)”, “Koi”, “Tisechu”, and “Taiji” connection, “Taiji” has been apparently confirmed negative nuance after assessing the analysis of Kirishitan document examples. Those three letters are in case of point where it shows “Tisechu” and “Love(Ai)” are commonly classified as mankind and animals or else with description of love between genders. Unlikely, “Tisechu” essentially carries discrete definitions. For instance, “Tisechu” definition includes “value, precious, and significance.” However, “Koi”, “Tisechu”, and “Taiji” definitions actually enclose with “longing” “value and significance” “love and affection”. In addition, in order to justify the concept of love, “Ai” was pertinent, but in thereabout, Buddhism or Christian never presumes “God’s love” as similar as the concept of “Ai.”This indicated when the present Kirishitan missionary teaches God’s love, one of the great reasons for not being able to appoint “Ai” application is truly shown in Amakusa heike and Amakusa isob. According to their documents in Medieval Kirishitan documents and usage, it is recognized to avoid “Aisu” through God and to discern “Aisu” through a woman and animal. Thus, Kirishitans appended the new definition of “God’s love” to “Tisechu,” expressing “Koi” defined and expanded “A Gender Love,” which the concept of “Ai” was also manipulated under Chinese character “love,” called “Meiji” Including Medieval Kirishitan documents, “Ai” usage of definition and chronological changes were scrutinized. The result was a general change of vocabulary’s definition, leading to the phenomenon of expanding vocabulary’s definition change throughout dominant chronological, social period. As mentioned, in the course of definition change, the recognition of Japanese love was largely reflected to verbal facts as well. From this time forward, the previous and emotion lexicon will be our groundwork with expanding consideration and observing historical lexicon facts’ perspectives.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 浅野敏彦, "語義の変化", 講座日本語と日本語教育, 6, pp.333~351 (1989), 明治書院
  2. 大野晋, "日本語の年輪", pp.101~ (1966), 新潮文庫
  3. 金岡孝, "語彙研究の歴史", 岩波講座 日本語, 9, pp.373~404 (1977), 岩波書店
  4. 金岡孝, "サントスの御作業の語彙", 講座国語史, 3, pp.219~242 (1977), 大修館書院
  5. 佐竹昭廣, "意味の變遷", 岩波講座 日本語, 9, pp.223~404 (1977), 岩波書店
  6. S.ウルマン, "言語と意味", pp.262~269 (1980), 大修館書店
  7. 新村出外, "新村出全集11", pp.88~91 (1971), 筑摩書房
  8. 福島邦道, "続キリシタン資料と国語研究", pp.3~16 (1983), 笠間叢書
  9. 松下貞三, "愛という語の受け入れ", 国語国文, 41(1), pp.1~18 (1972)
  10. 宮地敦子, "愛す考", 国語国文, 35(6), pp.438~453 (1966)
  11. 宮地敦子, "身心語彙の史的研究", pp.155~186 (1979), 明治書院
  12. 柳田征司, "中世語: 論集日本語研究", pp.321~332 (1980), 有精堂
  13. 江口正弘, "天草版平家物語対照本文及び総検索引" (1986), 明治書院
  14. 遠藤潤一, "伊曾保物語第二種本の本文翻刻と本文研究" (1994), 風間書房
  15. 大塚光信, "エソポのハブラス本文と總索引" (1999), 淸文堂
  16. 織田得能, "仏教大辞典", 名著普及会刊行, 1, pp.1~5 (1977)
  17. 佐藤喜代治, "国語学研究辞典5版", pp.276~277 (1983), 明治書院
  18. 上智大学, "カトリック大辞典", pp.1~5 (1996), 硏究社
  19. 土井忠生, "ロドリゲス日本大文典" (1955), 三省堂
  20. 土井忠生, "邦訳日葡辞書", pp.15~17 (1980), 岩波書店
  21. 土井忠生, "時代別国語大辞典:室町編", pp.1~5 (1994), 三省堂
  22. 豊島正之, "キリシタン版ぎやどぺかどる(本文 索引)" (1987), 清文堂
  23. "日本古典文学全集" (1975), 小学館
  24. 日本大辞典刊行会, "日本国語大辞典", pp.7~8 (1973), 小学館
  25. 福島邦道, "天草版イソポ物語大英図書館本影印", 勉誠社
  26. 福島邦道, "天草版平家物語大英図書館所藏本影印" (1994), 勉誠社
  27. 松岡洸司, "こんてむつすむん地本文と註解" (1996), ゆまに書房

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)