いわゆる「もちぬしのうけみ」の 構文的な特徴について-【人が人にNをV-られる】構文を中心に-
Structural Characteristics in Japanese passive in which subject possesses complement
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to clarify structural characteristics in Japanese passive sentences in which subject possesses complement. Most studies have focused on semantic features of some typical types, and there seems that empirical consideration with examples from the corpus is insufficient. In this study, it is argued that the semantic relevance between the subject and the complement of passive sentences are classifiable into eight types: [family members], [body part], [nature], [behavior], [creations], [property], [associated space] and [associated time], and that the semantic relevance is supported by features of the noun (relatives noun): [Taro ga goutou ni korosareru.] (“A son of Taro is killed by robbery.”), [Taro ga aruotoko ni netorareru. ] (“A wife of Taro has slept with a man.”), modifier clause, and the context. The classification for [5.1.]~[5.8.] adopted for analysis is based on the types of semantic relevance and semantic verb categories. Furthermore, it is discussed on the relation between affectivity of passive subject and undesirable event for subject described by Type 5.7, 5.8, which is identified from classification of grammatical function of verb. This tendency is supported by modality, meaning of principal clause, context, and noun modifier.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to clarify structural characteristics in Japanese passive sentences in which subject possesses complement. Most studies have focused on semantic features of some typical types, and there seems that empirical consideration with examples from the corpus is insufficient. In this study, it is argued that the semantic relevance between the subject and the complement of passive sentences are classifiable into eight types: [family members], [body part], [nature], [behavior], [creations], [property], [associated space] and [associated time], and that the semantic relevance is supported by features of the noun (relatives noun): [Taro ga goutou ni korosareru.] (“A son of Taro is killed by robbery.”), [Taro ga aruotoko ni netorareru. ] (“A wife of Taro has slept with a man.”), modifier clause, and the context. The classification for [5.1.]~[5.8.] adopted for analysis is based on the types of semantic relevance and semantic verb categories. Furthermore, it is discussed on the relation between affectivity of passive subject and undesirable event for subject described by Type 5.7, 5.8, which is identified from classification of grammatical function of verb. This tendency is supported by modality, meaning of principal clause, context, and noun modifier.
참고문헌 (19)
- 奥田靖雄, "日本語文法・連語論(資料編)", pp.21~149 (1983), むぎ書房
- 奥田靖雄, "ことばの研究・序説", pp.3~40 (1984), むぎ書房
- 金澤庄三郎, "日本文法新論" (1912), 早稲田大学出版部
- 川村大, "受身文をめぐる学説史-受身の「意味」を問う観点から-", 言語学会夏期講座における配布資料, 1~42 (2008)
- 工藤真由美, "現代日本語の受動文", ことばの科学, 4, pp.47~102 (1990), むぎ書房
- 鈴木重幸, "日本語文法・形態論", pp.276~284 (1972), むぎ書房
- 菅井三実, "日本語における直接受け身文と間接受け身文の統一的説明", 名古屋大学日本語・日本文化論集, 2, pp.23~42 (1994), 名古屋大学
- 高橋太郎, "文中にあらわれる所属関係の種々相", 国語学, 103, pp.1~17 (1975), 国語学会
- 仁田義雄, "藤森ことば論集", pp.3~34 (1992), 清文堂
- 早津恵美子, "語彙と文法との関わり―カテゴリカルな意味―", 政大日本研究, (6), pp.1~70 (2009), (台湾)国立政治大學日本語文學系
- 堀口和吉, "<はた迷惑の受身>考", 山辺道, 27(1983), pp.37~48 (1982), 天理大学国文学研究室
- 堀口和吉, "競合の受身", 山辺道, 34, pp.31~40 (1990), 天理大学国文学研究室
- 松下大三郎, "標準日本文法" (1924), 紀元社
- 三上章, "現代語法序説" (1953), 刀江書院
- 三矢重松, "高等日本文法" (1908), 明治書院
- 村上三寿, "うけみ構造の文", ことばの科学, 1, pp.7~87 (1986), むぎ書房
- 村上三寿, "うけみ構造の文の意味的なタイプ", ことばの科学, 8, pp.103~149 (1997), むぎ書房
- Kubo,Miori, "Japanese Passives", 北海道大学言語文化部紀要, 23, pp.231~302 (1993), 北海道大学
- "紙幅の都合上省略する", ~
