連体修飾形指示表現にみられる例示指示と唯一指示
Illustrative Reference and Unique Reference in Adnominal Demonstrative Expressions
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
.
Abstract
A comprehensive account of the adnominal demonstrative expressions of contemporary Japanese has not been developed in the literature. In this article, we will address the six groups of adnominal demonstrative expressions, and reveal their functional differences through quantitative and qualitative analyses. The expressions of the kono-group refer to an entity or a single category (“unique reference”) and do not have the illustrative function of implicitly referring to other entities as an example of referents. Our analyses indicate that the expressions in the non-kono-groups are commonly characterized in that they exhibit illustrative reference but that they differ in terms of the manner of illustrative reference, the strength of illustrative reference, etc. The function of illustrative reference is especially tied to the konoyouna-group, the koushita-group, and the kouitta-group. The expressions in these groups do not have the function of unique reference. The expressions in the konoyouna-group illustratively refer to approximate referents. On the other, the expressions in the kouitta-group are associated with representative illustrations. The konna-group and the kouiu-group display both the function of illustrative reference and that of unique reference. The expressions in the konna-group tend to refer to unique entities when inherent and specific objects are referred to. Further, in the case of the cataphoric use, they may refer to unique entities when the content of referents (linguistic information) is presented sufficiently and non-excessively. Unique reference in the case of the cataphoric use is also observed in the expressions in the kouiu-group.
참고문헌 (18)
- 庵功雄, "テキスト的意味の付与について", 大阪大学日本学報, 14, pp.79~92 (1995), 大阪大学
- 庵功雄, "日本語におけるテキストの結束性の研究", pp.1~246 (2007), くろしお出版
- 岡部寛, "日本語類義表現の文法(下)複文・連文編", pp.638~644 (1995), くろしお出版
- 기쿠치세이지, "「コンナ類」と「コウイウ類」の使い分け - 指示名詞句に形容詞が共起している場合を中心に -", 일본어문학, (53), pp.17~36 (2011), 일본어문학회[DOI]
- 菊池誠治, "日本語の指示連体詞に関する研究", 博士, pp.2013
- 木村英樹, "『こんな』と『この』の文脈照応について", 日本学報, 2, pp.71~83 (1983), 明治書院
- 金水敏, "連体修飾成分の機能""松村明教授古稀記念国語研究論集" (1986), 明治書院
- 金水敏, "日本語文法セルフマスターシリーズ4指示詞", pp.1~114 (1989), くろしお出版
- 近 悠 美, "連体詞「こういう」「こうした」の使い分け", 日本文化學報, (63), pp.25~48 (2014), 한국일본문화학회
- 近悠美, "『こういう』『こういった』の使い分け", 実践国文学, 88, pp.25~41 (2015), 実践国文学会
- Sakaguchi Sayaka, "コンナ類とコノヨウナ類の指示用法の違いについて -文脈指示の属性用法と内容用法を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 95(1), pp.137~156 (2015), 한국일어일문학회
- Sakaguchi Sayaka, "連体修飾形の指示表現にみられる相違 ─後続名詞句の特徴から-", 일어일문학연구, 97(1), pp.231~252 (2016), 한국일어일문학회
- 高橋美奈子, "日本語類義表現の文法(下)複文・連文篇", pp.408~415 (1995), くろしお出版
- 高橋太郎, "指示語の性格", 日本語学, 9, pp.4~21 (1990), 明治書院
- 田中望, "日本語の指示詞", pp.1~50 (1981), 国立国語研究所
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法7 第12部談話 第13部待遇表現", pp.1~223 (2009), くろしお出版
- 藤田保幸, "国語引用構文の研究", pp.402~410 (2000), 和泉書院
- 守時なぎさ, "連体修飾節における複合辞", 日本語と日本文学, 30, pp.33~45 (2000), 筑波大学
