본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

日本語慣用句の効率的学習と教育のための研究 -初中‧上級日本語教材の分析を中心に-

A Constrastive Study on the Japanese and Korean idioms -An analysis of Four Types of patterns of Japanese idioms-

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study was able to identify and classify four types of patterns of meanings and form. It is based on the results of a contrastive linguistic analysis of idioms appearing in lower, intermediate, and advanced Japanese study materials, in contrast to those of Korean idioms. In other words, we have differentiated following traits in Japanese and Korean idioms: 1) A type (Complete Symmetry), 2)A′ type (Partial Symmetry) 3)B type (Dissymmetry), 4) ⏀ type(Asymmetry). Following the results of a basic quantitative and semantic analysis, we came to understand the following: First, there were a large quantity of semantic types corresponding to the types of idioms in the order of type A⟶A′⟶B⟶⏀. Secondly, the semantic degree of difficulty is also in this order of type A⟶A′⟶B⟶⏀, and thus, for educational purposes, should also be presented in this order. Finally, the way of thinking between both countries, as well as similarities in ways of expression and conception, decrease through this semantic order of A⟶A'⟶B⟶⏀, and therefore we can see an increased tendency towards abstract thinking rather than concrete ways of thinking. Thus, needless to say, a larger semantic degree of difficulty also shows a larger degree of difference between cultures and language customs between the two countries. As for future research, we would like to further examine, select and present definitions and standards such “basic idioms” and “medium and high-level idioms”, based on the classification of these four types. Finally, following these prior conclusions, we conclude it would be suitable to write learning materials on “level-specific idioms” as part of Japanese language learning materials.

Abstract

This study was able to identify and classify four types of patterns of meanings and form. It is based on the results of a contrastive linguistic analysis of idioms appearing in lower, intermediate, and advanced Japanese study materials, in contrast to those of Korean idioms. In other words, we have differentiated following traits in Japanese and Korean idioms: 1) A type (Complete Symmetry), 2)A′ type (Partial Symmetry) 3)B type (Dissymmetry), 4) ⏀ type(Asymmetry). Following the results of a basic quantitative and semantic analysis, we came to understand the following: First, there were a large quantity of semantic types corresponding to the types of idioms in the order of type A⟶A′⟶B⟶⏀. Secondly, the semantic degree of difficulty is also in this order of type A⟶A′⟶B⟶⏀, and thus, for educational purposes, should also be presented in this order. Finally, the way of thinking between both countries, as well as similarities in ways of expression and conception, decrease through this semantic order of A⟶A'⟶B⟶⏀, and therefore we can see an increased tendency towards abstract thinking rather than concrete ways of thinking. Thus, needless to say, a larger semantic degree of difficulty also shows a larger degree of difference between cultures and language customs between the two countries. As for future research, we would like to further examine, select and present definitions and standards such “basic idioms” and “medium and high-level idioms”, based on the classification of these four types. Finally, following these prior conclusions, we conclude it would be suitable to write learning materials on “level-specific idioms” as part of Japanese language learning materials.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 林八龍, "日韓身体語彙慣用句の比較対照のための基礎研究", 317~318 (1988)
  2. 林八龍, "韓日身体語彙慣用句の対照研究", pp.63~64 (2006), J&C
  3. 禹京淑, "「慣用句」としての「腹と「배」の意味考찰 -「慣用語句」と「諺」の考察を中心に", 日語日文学研究, 6, pp.245~264 (1985), 韓国日語日文学会
  4. 禹京淑, "「慣用句」としての「ロ(くち)、鼻(はな)」と「입、귀」の意味考察と敎授法について", 日語日文学研究, pp.77~103 (1986), 韓国日語日文学会
  5. 具仁謨, "植民地朝鮮人を論じる" (2010), 東国大学出版部
  6. 高橋享, "朝鮮人", pp.144~145 (1921), 朝鮮総督府
  7. 白石大二, "国語慣用句辞典", pp.258~ (1969), 東京堂書店
  8. 鈴木禜三, "故事ことわざ辞典", pp.7~ (1957), 東京堂
  9. 薛根洙, "慣用句と連語との関係研究", 全北大学教育論業, 23, pp.65~87 (2003), 韓国全北大
  10. 설근수, "慣用句と連語との關係硏究", 일본연구, (6), pp.171~185 (2006), 글로벌일본연구원
  11. 薛根洙, "Corpus Managerを利用した言語学研究:連語と慣用句を中心に", 韓国日本語文学会学術発表大会論文集, pp.37~42 (2006)
  12. 설근수, "移動動詞の研究-「連語と慣用句との関係」を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 100(1), pp.253~269 (2017), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  13. 張扶姸, "日本語教育における慣用句の指導に関する教育", 日本語教育研究, 12(112), pp.105~112 (2007), 日本語教育学会
  14. 鄭恵卿, "ことばと沈黙に対する認識", 韓国日本学会 第60回 国際学術発表大会発表論文集, pp.446~450 (2003), 韓国日本学会
  15. 鄭恵卿, "応用言語学語と日本語", pp.123~ (2009), 図書出版 博而情
  16. 鄭恵卿, "日韓慣用句の意味と類型の対照分析", 韓国日語日文学会 2015年 冬季国際学術大会 発表論文集 -日本語学・日本語教育, pp.198~201 (2015), 韓国日語日文学会
  17. 南昌姙, "悲しみを現わす慣用句の日韓対照研究", 韓国日本語文学会学秋季術発表大会論文集, pp.102~106 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)