본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『四夷総説』日本条の「寄語」について

About “gieo(寄語)” in Japanese part of “Saichongseol(四夷総説)”

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

“Saichongseol(四夷総説, The outlines of surrounding barbarians)” is one of books written by Lee Hyeongsang(李衡祥). This is about information on ethnic groups and nations around Korea and China, and the part named “geumsai(Modern barbarians)” consist only of information about Japan. In this section, there is a chapter called “gieo(寄語, lexicon)”, which describes the Japanese words and its pronunciation with Chinese characters. But actually it is almost the same contents as a book called “rìběn jìyú(日本寄語, lexicon of Japanese).” It appears in books on Japanese affairs and geographies represented by “Rìběnguó kǎolüè(日本国考略, The Study of Japan)”, which was compiled during the Ming dynasty. In this article, I investigated and discussed the “gieo” in the Japanese article of “Saichongseol”, what they are derived from, if there are any features that can be said to be unique to “gieo”, and if they contribute to the text revision of “rìběn jìyú”, etc. As a result, I found that “gieo” in “Saichongseol” is very similar to the “Jìyú zálèi(寄語雑類, miscellaneous Lexicon)” in “Dēng tán bì jīu(登壇必究)”, one of books on military published in the end of the Ming dynasty. I assert the former must be reprint of the latter.

Abstract

“Saichongseol(四夷総説, The outlines of surrounding barbarians)” is one of books written by Lee Hyeongsang(李衡祥). This is about information on ethnic groups and nations around Korea and China, and the part named “geumsai(Modern barbarians)” consist only of information about Japan. In this section, there is a chapter called “gieo(寄語, lexicon)”, which describes the Japanese words and its pronunciation with Chinese characters. But actually it is almost the same contents as a book called “rìběn jìyú(日本寄語, lexicon of Japanese).” It appears in books on Japanese affairs and geographies represented by “Rìběnguó kǎolüè(日本国考略, The Study of Japan)”, which was compiled during the Ming dynasty. In this article, I investigated and discussed the “gieo” in the Japanese article of “Saichongseol”, what they are derived from, if there are any features that can be said to be unique to “gieo”, and if they contribute to the text revision of “rìběn jìyú”, etc. As a result, I found that “gieo” in “Saichongseol” is very similar to the “Jìyú zálèi(寄語雑類, miscellaneous Lexicon)” in “Dēng tán bì jīu(登壇必究)”, one of books on military published in the end of the Ming dynasty. I assert the former must be reprint of the latter.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 權寧徹, "甁窩李衡祥硏究" (1978), 韓國硏究院
  2. 朴珉徹, "甁窩 李衡祥의 著述과 家藏文獻의 書誌的 分析", 碩士, 文獻情報學, pp.2011
  3. 福島邦道, "日本考略・日本図纂解題", 日本寄語の研究, pp.1~75 (1965)
  4. 浜田敦, "日本寄語解読試案", 日本寄語の研究, pp.77~162 (1965)
  5. 京都大学文学部国語学国文学研究室, "日本寄語の研究" (1965), 京都大学国文学会
  6. 馬之濤, "明代中国資料による室町時代の音韻についての研究 ―『日本国考略』を中心に―", 博士, 文学研究科, pp.2014
  7. 蒋垂東, "『皇明馭倭録』の「寄語畧」について", 文教文学部紀要, 15(1), pp.38~54 (2001)
  8. 蒋垂東, "日本語を記載する『倭情考略』『籌海重編』", 文教大学文学部紀要, 16(1), pp.27~41 (2002)
  9. Togasaki Yuichi, "李衡祥『字学』の「倭諺」について", 일어일문학연구, 103(1), pp.73~90 (2017), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)