受動文の動作主表示「に」、「から」の一考察
A Study on Marks of Agent 「ni」, 「kara」 in Japanese Passive
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study will focus on the use of 「ni」 and 「kara」 which is incorporated to anoun of agent in Japanese passive voice. Since 「ni」 is used in both indirect passive and direct passive, it is most frequentlyused with respect to quantitative aspects and with various transtive verbs. Incontrast, 「kara」 is not used in indirect passive. But, 「kara」is used with more varioustranstive verbs than 「ni」. 「ni」has a relatively large number of cases that a subjectand an agent are animate object (have life or movement). So, it has a large numberof cases of Actional Passive, what Hosokawa said. However, since it also has abite large number of the cases of an inanimate object, it is considered that the numberof Statal Passive is not small. 「kara」has a large number of cases that subject andan agent are animate object. So, it is likely to be considered that it has characterof Actional Passive, what Hosokawa said( more frequently used than 「ni」). From the argument that when a subject is animated object, the feeling of gettingbenefits or harms is especially strong, we can feel the difference with a degree「kara」(83%) >「ni」(81%). Also, since 「ni」has both a directional aspect (~to) and positionalaspect(in~), it is most frequently used with respect to quantitative aspects. However,「kara」only has a directional aspect(from~) and from the perspective of an agent,it has a directional aspect which moves away from the agent.
Abstract
This study will focus on the use of 「ni」 and 「kara」 which is incorporated to anoun of agent in Japanese passive voice. Since 「ni」 is used in both indirect passive and direct passive, it is most frequentlyused with respect to quantitative aspects and with various transtive verbs. Incontrast, 「kara」 is not used in indirect passive. But, 「kara」is used with more varioustranstive verbs than 「ni」. 「ni」has a relatively large number of cases that a subjectand an agent are animate object (have life or movement). So, it has a large numberof cases of Actional Passive, what Hosokawa said. However, since it also has abite large number of the cases of an inanimate object, it is considered that the numberof Statal Passive is not small. 「kara」has a large number of cases that subject andan agent are animate object. So, it is likely to be considered that it has characterof Actional Passive, what Hosokawa said( more frequently used than 「ni」). From the argument that when a subject is animated object, the feeling of gettingbenefits or harms is especially strong, we can feel the difference with a degree「kara」(83%) >「ni」(81%). Also, since 「ni」has both a directional aspect (~to) and positionalaspect(in~), it is most frequently used with respect to quantitative aspects. However,「kara」only has a directional aspect(from~) and from the perspective of an agent,it has a directional aspect which moves away from the agent.
참고문헌 (42)
- 김미연, "日本語受動文の動作主表示と他動詞の關係の硏究", 박사, 일어일문학, pp.2010
- 김미연, "受動表現における動作主表示「で」の 用法について", 일본언어문화, (16), pp.65~84 (2010), 한국일본언어문화학회
- 尹鎬淑, "受動文における動作主のマーカーについてー近代の小説を中心 としてー", 中国四国教育学会教育学研究紀要, 41(２), pp.43~ (1995)
- 李成圭, "日本語受動文の研究", pp.150~156 (2003), 불이문화
- 奥津敬一郎, "何故受身か？", 国語学, 132, pp.79~ (1983)
- 工藤真由美, "現代日本語の受動文", ことばの科学, 4, pp.51~57 (1990), 言語学研究会むぎ書房
- 久野暲, "受身文の意味ー黒田説の再批判ー", 日本語学, ５(2), pp.199~ (1986)
- 黒田成幸, "受身文についての久野説を改釈するー一つの批判ー", 日本語学, (10), pp.71~74 (1985)
- 言語学研究会, "日本語文法⋅連語論(資料編)" (1983), むぎ書房
- 佐伯哲夫, "受動態動作主マーカー考(上)", 日本語学, 6(１), pp.104~106 (1987)
- 佐伯哲夫, "受動態動作主マーカー考(下)", 日本語学, 6(2), pp.101~105 (1987)
- 砂川有里子, "＜に受身文＞と＜によって受身文＞", 日本語学, 3(７), pp.75~ (1983)
- 高橋太郎, "現代日本語のヴォイスについて", 日本語学, pp.17~ (1985)
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味１", pp.212~254 (1991), くろしお出版
- 橋本進吉, "助詞⋅助動詞の研究", pp.282~ (1978), 岩波書店
- 早津恵美子, "有対他動詞の受身表現についてー無対他動詞の受身表現との比較を中心にー", 日本語学, pp.76~ (1990)
- 細川由紀子, "日本語の受身文における動作主のマーカについて", 国語学, 132, pp.123~124 (1986)
- 村上三寿, "うけみ構造の文, In ことばの科学１", pp.15~42 (1986), 言語学研究会むぎ書房
- 村上三寿, "動詞のうけみのかたちにおける結果相, In ことばの科学3", pp.137~142 (1989), むぎ書房
- 村上三寿, "うけみ構造の文の意味的なタイプ, In ことばの科学8", pp.104~ (1997), むぎ書房
- 村木新次郎, "ヴォイス, In 講座日本語と日本語教育４", pp.193~ (1989), 講座日本語と日本語教育
- 渡辺慎晤, "いわゆる状態のうけ身 STATAL PASSIVEの意味についてー状態⋅滞在⋅配置⋅所有ー, In ことばの科学5", pp.43~ (1992), むぎ書房
- 宇野千代, "おはん, In 日本の文学46" (1969), 中央公論社
- 宇野千代, "未練" (1969), 中央公論社
- 江国香織, "冷静と情熱のあいだ" (2007), 角川文庫
- 遠藤周作, "ぐうたら愛情学" (1973), 講談社
- 遠藤周作, "さらば、夏の光よ" (1992), 講談社
- オースティン, "エマ" (1991), 中央公論社
- 片山恭一, "世界の中心で愛をさけぶ" (2006), 小学館文庫
- 北杜夫, "酔いどれ船" (1973), 新潮社
- サガン, "ある微笑" (1987), 新潮文庫
- 椎名麟三, "美しい女" (1972), 新潮文庫
- 乃南アサ, "幸福な朝食" (2001), 新潮文庫
- 林芙美子, "放浪記" (1982), ポプラ社
- 林真理子, "マリコ自身" (1988), 光文社
- 林真理子, "愛すればこそ" (1988), 文芸春秋
- 堀田善衛, "スピィンクス" (1965), 毎日新聞社
- 松本清張, "黄色い風土" (1963), 光文社
- 向田邦子, "あ⋅うん" (1983), 文芸春秋
- 山崎豊子, "白い巨塔" (1973), 新潮社
- 吉川英治, "新⋅平家物語(Ⅰ)" (1986), 六興出版