韓･日 대학성적평가 비교 고찰 －인간이해와 미래지향적 관점에서－

Abstract

This study proposes the future evaluation method while comparing the cases of Korea and Japan in the problems of university grade evaluation. First, I explained the process in which both countries are repeating revisions and progress while operating absolute evaluation and relative evaluation. This left a big question as to whether the system introduced under the leadership of the Korean Ministry of Education and the Japanese Ministry of Education, would be effective. And it became clear that it is an evaluation method that is far from the educational goals required in the future post-corona era. In the case of South Korea, it seems necessary to correct the disadvantages of rigid relative evaluation and develop a versatile evaluation method that has been fully discussed between teachers and learners while acknowledging the autonomy of teaching authority. The Japanese should also clarify the problem of quantifying the ranking of the GPA system so that the characteristics evaluated based on the authority and trust of the professor are not distorted. Then, it is necessary to reconsider the method of sharing evaluation methods that would lose the original purpose of grade evaluation by blindly believing in the acceptance of accreditation and global quantification by a third party.