본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

차등의결권 제도의 경제학적 분석

Economic Analysis of Dual Class Stock

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

차등의결권 제도란 회사가 의결권 수가 서로 다른 종류의 주식을 발행할 수 있는 제도다. 차등의결권주식을 발행할 경우 지배주주나 경영진은 적은 지분율을 가지고도 회사 지배구조에 막강한 영향력을 행사할 수 있다. 이런 차등의결권 제도 도입을 반대하는 사람들은 1주 1표 원칙과 주주평등원칙에 어긋난다고 비판한다. 그러나 역사적으로 볼 때 1인 1표, 신중한 중위투표, 1주 1표 등 다양한 의결권 행사 방식이 존재했다. 최근에도 유럽이나 미국 기업들은 1주 1표가 아닌 다른 의결권 행사 방식을 채택하는 경우가 있다. 제3자가 보기에 불평등한 대우를 받는 계약처럼 보이더라도, 그것이 자발적인 계약에 의한 것이라면 거래당사자가 모두 이익을 얻는다. 그러므로 자발적인 계약에 의한 차등의결권 제도 도입은 주주평등원칙에 위배되지 않으며, 오히려 이 제도 도입을 금지하는 것은 계약자유의 원칙에 위배되며 시장의 효율성을 떨어뜨린다. 또 차등의결권으로 인해 지배주주의 사익추구 가능성을 제기하지만, 선행연구 결과들은 일관된 결론을 내리지 못하고 있다. 그리고 차등의결권 주식을 도입할 경우 주식회사들은 경영권 안정을 유지하면서 자금조달 수단을 다양화할 수 있다. 따라서 차등의결권 제도는 주주들의 선택에 의해 채택할 수 있도록 현행 상법상 강행규정인 1주 1표 원칙을 임의규정으로 개정해야 한다.

Abstract

Dual class stock is issued by a company giving different voting rights based on an investment of equal value. By issuing the dual class stock, managers can exercise control rights of corporate governance with small equity rates. Most people have regarded the principle of one share one vote as mandatory rule. But historically shareholders have exercised various voting rights, one shareholder-one vote and prudent mean vote, one share-one vote etc. Therefore One share-one vote should not be understood as dominating rule with no exceptions. If shareholders agree voluntarily the contract of issuing dual class stock, it does not infringe the principle of shareholders' equal treatments and all the parties get the benefit from the contract. The prohibition of dual class stock violates the freedom of contract and lowers the market efficiency. Therefore, shareholders must be given the choice to decide on issuance of the dual class stock.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김병연, "적대적 M&A 방어수단 관련 현행법상 문제점과 개선방안" (2005), 전국경제인연합회
  2. 김우찬, "독약증권(poison pill) 우리나라에선 진짜 독", 경제개혁 리포트, (2008-6) (2008)
  3. 최한수, "재계의 경영권 방어수단 도입 주장에 대한 비판적 검토", 기업지배구조연구, (봄) (2008)
  4. Donald Chew, "Studies in International Corporate Finance and Governance Systems" (1997), Oxford University Press
  5. Report on the Proportionality Principle in the European Union, Institutional Shareholder Service, Shearman & Sterling, "European Committee", European Corporate Governance Institute, ~ (2007)
  6. Lucian Bebchuk, "Corporate Law and Economic Analysis" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  7. Kenneth Lipartito, "Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture" (2004), Oxford University Press
  8. Klaus J. Hopt, "Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research" (1998), Oxford University Press
  9. NYSE, "Listed Company Manuel", ~, pp.지침서
  10. OECD, "Lack of Proportionality between Ownership and Control: Overview and Issues for Discussion" (2007), OECD Steering Group on Corporate Governance
  11. Stephen Bainbridge, "Corporations:Law and Economic Analysis" (2002), Foundation Press
  12. Stephen Bainbridge, "Mergers and Acquisition" (2003), Foundation Press
  13. The One-Share-One-Vote Controversy in the EU, "Arman Khachaturyan", ECMI, ~, pp.ECMI Paper No.1 (2006)
  14. Collen Dunlavy, "Corporate governance in late 19th-century Europe and the U.S. The Case of Shareholder Voting Rights in Comparative Corporate Governance" (1998), Oxford University Press
  15. Collen Dunlavy, "Social Conceptions of the Corporation: Insights from the History of Shareholder Voting Rights", Washington & Lee Law Review, 63(4), pp.1347~1588 (2006), WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
  16. Collen Dunlavy, "From Citizens to Plutocrats: Nineteenth-century Shareholder Voting Rights and Theories of the Corporation in Constructing corporate America: History, Politics, Culture" (2004), Constructing corporate America:History,Politics,Culture,Oxford University Press
  17. Deminor Rating, "Application of the One share-One Vote Principle in Europe" (2005), Association of British Insurers
  18. Frank Partnoy, "Encumbered Shares", University of California,Berkeley Law and Economic Workshop (2004)
  19. G. Jarrell, "Dual Class Recapitalizations as Antitakeover Mechanisms", Journal of Financial Economics, 통권 : 20, pp.129~152 (1988)
  20. One Share-One Vote:A European Rule?, "Guido Ferrarini", ECGI, ~, pp.ECGI Working Paper No.58 (2006)
  21. Joann Muller, "2.27", Forbs, ~, pp.기사 (2006), 2006. 2. 27.일자
  22. Kenneth Lehn, "Consolidating Corporate Control: Dual Class Recapitalizations verses Leveraged Buyouts", Journal of Financial Economics, 통권 : 27, pp.557~580 (1990)
  23. Lucian Bebchuck, "Federal Corporate Law: Lessons from History", Columbia Law Review, 통권 : 106, pp.1793~1839 (2006)
  24. Dual Class Stock Unifications and Shareholders' Expropriation, "Marco Bigelli", ~
  25. Megan Partch, "The Creation of Class of Limited Voting Common Stock and Shareholder Wealth", Journal of Financial Economics, 통권 : 18, pp.313~339 (1987)
  26. Recent Developments in German Corporate Governance, "M. Gogeren", ~, pp.Center Discussion paper 2004-123 (2004)
  27. One Share-One Vote Debate: A Theoretical Perspective, "Mike Burkart", ECGI, ~, pp.ECGI Working Paper No.176 (2007)
  28. M.M. Cornett, "Voting Rights and Shareholder Wealth", Managerial and Decision Economics, (가을), pp.175~188 (1989)
  29. Incentives vs.Control:An Analysis of U.S.Dual-Class Companies, "Paul A.Gompers", NBER Working Paper, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper No.10240 (2004)
  30. Richard Y.Roberts, "Listing Standards on Shareholder Voting Rights" (1991), Twentieth Annual Securities Institute,Cleveland Bar Association
  31. Ronald J. Gilson, "Regulating the equity component of capital structure: The SEC's Response to the One-Share, One-Vote Controversy,” in Studies in International Corporate Finance and Governance Systems" (1997), Oxford University Press
  32. Ronald Lease, "The Market Value of Control in Publicly-Traded Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics, 통권 : 11, pp.439~471 (1983)
  33. S. Grossman, "One-Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control", Journal of Financial Economics, 통권 : 20, pp.175~202 (1988)
  34. The Scope of the SEC's Authority over Shareholder Voting Rights, "Stephen Bainbridge", UCLA School of Law Research, ~, pp.UCLA School of Law Research Paper No.07 (2007)
  35. Stephen Bainbridge, "The Short Life and Resurrection of SEC Rule 19c-4", Washington University Law Quarterly, 통권 : 69, pp.565~634 (1991)
  36. "Recapitalization of One Class of Common Stock into Dual-class: Growth and Long-run Stock Returns" (2004)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)