再议汉语“何况”与韩语“하물며”的语法特点
Re-discuss the Grammatical Features of Chinese “Hekuang” and Korean “하물며”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
汉语“何况”与韩语“하물며”是较典型的表递进语义的词汇表达形式,两者在语义上基本可以对应,但在具体的句法、语义、语用平面上仍存在一些差异。本文主要借助语言学“梯阶”的概念,对两者进行对比分析初步可得出如下小结:首先,在语义层面上,汉语“何况”有两个较典型语义,皆可借助梯阶概念进行解释说明,且汉语“何况2”的独立性、语法化程度逐渐增强,有逐渐超越“何况1”典型用法的倾向,对于汉韩语相关呈现不同的语法特点有较重要的影响;韩语“하물며”的词典义尽管只有一种典型语义,但在具体语料中也有类似“何况2”的补充说明语义,但现阶段并没有超越典型义的倾向。其次,在句法方面,我们主要从句法位置、句型、共现成分三方面进行对比,可以发现,在句法位置上,“何况”用于句首、句中皆较为常见,“하물며”多用于句中;句型上,“何况”用于陈述句的情况多于“하물며”,韩语“하물며”用于疑问句的情况多于何况”;共现成分上,两者的常用表达呈现镜像分布的倾向。再次,在语用方面,我们主要从信息焦点的角度进行了初步分析,认为两者不局限于提示后置对比焦点,也可以提示前置焦点,但“何况”提示前置焦点的用法已较典型,“하물며”提示前置焦点的用法尚不典型。相关特点与两者在语义方面的差异以及对句法、语用层面进行投射有较大关联。本文希望通过对汉韩语相近语言表达的对比,来寻找些许差异,以便为外语学习者提供些许参考。
Abstract
Chinese ‘Hekuang’ and Korean ‘하물며’ are relatively typical lexical expressions expressing progressive semantics. These two expressions can correspond in semantics, but there are still some differences in specific syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. This paper mainly draws on the concept of ‘scale’, and taking the comparative analysis of these two expressions, the following conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, at the semantic level, there are two typical meanings of Chinese ‘Hekuang’, both of them can be explained with the concept of ‘scale’, and the independence and grammaticalization of Chinese ‘Hekuang2’ have gradually increased, and there is a tendency to gradually surpass the typical usage of ‘Hekuang1’, which has a more important influence on the different grammatical characteristics of Chinese and Korean. Although the dictionary meaning of Korean ‘하물며’ has only one typical meaning, there are also supplementary meanings similar to ‘Hekuang2’ in the specific corpus, there is no tendency to go beyond the typical meaning at this stage. Secondly, in terms of syntax, we mainly compare the three aspects of the syntactic position, sentence pattern, and co-occurrence expressions. It can be found that in terms of syntactic position, ‘Hekuang’ is commonly used in the beginning and middle of sentences, and ‘하물며’ is mostly used in the sentence; in terms of sentence structure, ‘Hekuang’ is used in declarative sentences more than ‘하물며’, and Korean ‘하물며’ is used in interrogative sentences more than ‘Hekuang’; in terms of co-occurrence expressions, the common expressions of the two show a mirror-image distribution. Thirdly, in terms of pragmatics, we mainly conducted a preliminary analysis from the perspective of information focus and proposed that these two expressions are not limited to promoting the post-contrast focus, but can also prompt the pre-focus, but ‘Hekuang’ prompts the usage of the pre-focus is more typical than ‘하물며’.
참고문헌 (20)
- 王自强, "现代汉语虚词词典" (1998), 上海辞书出版社
- 金京勳, "現代國語 副詞語 硏究", 박사, 국어학, pp.1996
- 김염, "'커녕' 및 관련 표현에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2014
- 오영선, "접속부사의 의미 연구-비‘그러-’계열을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2019
- Wang Fei, "“何况”和“하물며”语义句法功能的对照研究", 중국문학, 96, pp.311~328 (2018), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 曹小云, "连词“何况”早期使用情况考察", 语言研究, (1) (1998), 华中科技大学
- 陈满华, "构式视域下的连词“何况”及“何况”句", 语言教学与研究, (4) (2022), 北京语言大学
- 단청총(单清丛), "信息结构理论视野下汉韩反预期副词语义对比研究", 중국학, (76), pp.273~292 (2021), 대한중국학회[DOI]
- 邓玉冰, "“尚且……何况……”表达的推理形式", 湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版), (2) (1982), 湖南科技大学
- 胡习之, "略论几种句式的逻辑基础", 阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版), (2) (1986), 阜阳师范大学
- 李绍群, "“尚且……何况”句式的来源及虚化轨迹", 古汉语研究, (3) (2012), 湖南师范大学
- 李宗江, "连词“何况”和“岂况”是怎样形成的?", 汉语学报, (2) (2014), 华中师范大学
- 陆方喆, "“何况”的主观性表达功能——兼析与“况且”的区别", 汉语学习, (6) (2013), 延边大学
- 梅利娅, "连词“何况”与“况且”的对比研究", 硕士, pp.2011
- 张邱林, "“尚且p, 何况q”反逼句式", 世界汉语教学, (3) (2009), 北京语言大学
- 周 莉, "后分句引导语“别说”与“何况、况且、而且”", 语言教学与研究, (2) (2017), 北京语言大学
- 陈振宇, "”预期范畴“研究", 2021年复旦大学暑期FIST课程讲义 (2021)
- "BCC现代汉语语料库"[URL]
- "네이버 중국어사전"[URL]
- "꼬꼬마 세종말뭉치"[URL]
