汉韩多义副词“都”“다”的语义关联顺序对比研究
A Contrastive study on the order of semantic association in Chinese ‘dou’ and Korean ‘ta’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
汉韩多义副词“都”和“다”既有客观性用法，又有主观性用法。共时层面的各个意义和用法之间存在一个虚化链，它们分别处于虚化链中的不同位置，其区别可以理解为语法化程度的高低，它反映的也是语法化顺序。而前人对多义副词“都”和“다”的对比研究，主要是以量化意义为中心展开的。围绕主观性用法，从主观化或语法化角度进行对比的研究则较为少见。基于上述思考，本文打算在前人相关研究基础上，重新审视汉韩多义副词“都”和“다”的基本语义功能，重点梳理两者在共时层面的各个意义和用法并进行概括分类，揭示各意义和用法的语法化程度即语义关联顺序，寻找两者主观化机制的异同点。
Abstract
Chinese polysemy adverb 'dou' and Korean polysemy adverb 'ta' have both objective and subjective usages. There is a virtual chain that exists between meanings (or usages) of different positions at the synchronic level. The difference can be understood as the degree of grammaticalization, which also reflects the order of grammaticalization. However, the previous comparative studies on Chinese and Korean polysemy adverbs 'dou' and 'ta' mainly focused on the quantificational meanings. Contrastive studies on subjective usage from the perspective of subjectivization or grammaticalization are relatively rare. Based on previous studies, this paper intends to re-examine the basic semantic functions of Chinese polysemy adverbs 'dou' and Korean polysemy adverbs 'ta' , focusing on combing and generally classifying the meanings and usages of the two adverbs at the synchronic level. Thus, the degree of grammaticalization of each meaning and usage, namely the order of semantic association, can be illustrated, and the similarities and differences of its subjectivalization mechanism can be found.
참고문헌 (40)
- 陈宝勤, "副词“都”的产生与发展", 辽宁大学学报, (2) (1998)
- 陈宗明, "汉语逻辑概论" (1993), 人民出版社
- 丁声树, "现代汉语语法讲话" (1961), 商务印书馆
- 郭锐, "汉语的形式与功能研究" (2009), 商务印书馆
- 高顺全, "多义副词的语法化顺序和习得顺序研究" (2012), 复旦大学出版社
- 蒋严, "语用推理与“都”的句法", 语义特征, 1998, pp.(1), ~
- 蒋静, "“都”总括全量手段的演变及其分类", 汉语学习, (4) (2003)
- 蒋勇, "对比参照点的语用功能", 社会科学战线, (5) (2004)
- 蒋静忠, "“都”的语义分合及解释规则", 中国语文, (1) (2013)
- 蒋严, "现代汉语语法讲话" (2009), 商务印书馆
- 李宗江, "汉语史研究集刊" (1998)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1980), 商务印书馆
- 李元华, "副词“都”表强调的用法探究", 语言文字学术研究, (2) (2021)
- 毛海燕, "汉韩语中全称量化词的对比-以“都”和 “모두", 다” 的对比为中心-, 2006, pp.(41), ~
- 沈家煊, "“语法化”研究综观", 外语教学与研究, (4) (1994)
- 沈家煊, "语言的“主观性”与“主观化”", 外语教学与研究, (4) (2001)
- 沈家煊, "语用推理和语义演变", 外语教学与研究, (4) (2004)
- 王敏, "总括副词“都”的语源及其语法化", 阴山学刊, (5) (2018)
- 王红, "副词“都”的语法意义试析", 汉语学习, (6) (1999)
- 王红, "语气副词“都”的语义、语用分析", 暨南大学华文学院学报, (1) (2001)
- 武振玉, "副词 “都”的产生和发展", 社会科学战线, (5) (2001)
- 王力, "古代汉语" (1979), 中华书局
- 徐以中, "副词“都”主观性、客观性及语用歧义", 语言研究, (3) (2005)
- 徐烈炯, "上海话“侪”与普通话“都”的异同", 方言, (2) (2007)
- 肖双荣, "“都”的全称量项义与隐含差比义", 湖南人文科技学院学报, (6) (2005)
- 邢雪明, "汉语副词“都”的全称量化研究", 湖中国语文齐齐哈尔大学学报, (1) (2021)
- 袁毓林, "汉语句子的焦点结构和语义解释" (2021), 商务印书馆
- 张谊生, "范围副词“都”的选择限制", 中国语文, (5) (2003)
- 张谊生, "副词“都”的语法化与主观化-兼论“都”的表达功用和内部分-", 语法化与语法研究, (1) (2005)
- 张亚军, "真实文本中副词“都”的语义识别策略与话语理解", 扬州大学学报, (2) (2007)
- 구일민, "양화사 ‘다’의 의미와 과장법 기제로서의 화용론적 해석 가능성", 한국어 의미학, 23, pp.1~20 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 김현주, "양화사 ‘다’의 형성과 의미 확장", 한국어문학국제학술포럼, 16 (2011)
- 신미경, "현대중국어 범위부사 '都'의 오류 분석과 교육 연구", 중어중문학, (63), pp.299~320 (2016), 한국중어중문학회
- 장경현, "부사 ‘다’의 의미와 기능", 언어사실과 관점, 45, pp.61~84 (2018), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- 유위, "중ㆍ한 전칭양화사 대조 연구 - 중국어 ‘都", 全’과 한국어 ‘전부, 다’를 중심으로, pp.중국학연구, 2015[DOI]
- 최재희, "한국어 전칭양화사 구문의구조와 의미 해석", 한글, (267), pp.89~118 (2005), 한글학회
- 엄정호, "한전칭 양화 부사의 의미", 배달말, 21 (1996)
- 임규홍, "중국어 ‘都’와 한국어 ‘다’의 비교 분석", 담화와 인지, 23(4), pp.111~135 (2016), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Huang,shi-zhe, "〈Dou as an existential quantifier〉, NACCL-6V.I.85-99, GSIL at USC", Paper presented at Six North America Conference on Chinese Linguistics (1995)
- Lee, Thomas, Hun-tak, "Studies on quantification in Chinese", Ph.D, pp.1986