적대와 연대 1930년대 ‘활자전선(活字戰線)’의 구축과 복수의 사회주의

Abstract

Discoursive struggle in and out of the socialist camp in 1930’s ‘represents-symbolizes’revolutionary of socialism and organized the front line(s) of new knowledge. At that time,front line of knowledge (‘hwaljajunsun’ for the expression of The Criticism (批判)) basedon human network in and out of the socialist camp sometimes dissolves or reorganize itand establishes flexibly by kind and direction of agenda. Socialism discourse causingchanges of colonial knowledge was organized by multi layers and the magazine showingthe state of debate the mostly is rightly The Criticism (批判). The magazine, The Criticism (批判), exchanges networks of hostility and solidarity in and out of the socialist camp. In The Criticism (批判), state of established debate can be greatly divided into three things; 1)criticism/ review 2) report / information / accusation 3) academic debate. It’s divided bystandpoint, sight and method, not material, subject or subject. The state of debate wascorrelatively organized, not clearly divided. However, three forms of debate showedclearly different purposes; 1) theoretical seeking of socialist movement 2) criticism of accidentialphenomenon 3) formation of academic intelligence. And, what represent each ofthem are 1) debate of Shinganhoe cancellation, 2) debate of leadership of Joseon movementbetween socialism and Cheondogyo 3) social formation debate. In early stage of TheCriticism (批判), debate of ‘criticism/ review’ showd high distribution and form of ‘report /information / accusation’ is gradually increased. In middle and latter stage of 1930s, mostof them are changed to ‘academic debate’. It is linked to decline of socialist movement,loss of prospect for Joseon actualities, control of legal speech space by Japan empire, etc. Through the process of discussion, it intend to prepare an opportunity to examine pluralof socialism which plays actual function in speech space of colonial Joseon in 1930s.