한국 망명지사들의 동아시아 인식과 주체성-중국 내 발행 잡지 자료를 중심으로

Abstract

The East Asian recognition of Korean exiles illustrates the characteristics of multiple subjectivity. In other words, it established national subjectivity through Japanese recognition, established dual subjectivity through Chinese-Korean relations recognition, and established multiple subjectivity through recognition of world peace. In other words, the Korean exiles recognized themselves as the subject of national liberation, the subject of the Chinese anti-Japanese struggle and, by extension, the subject of the world’s oppressed people. The Korean exiles appeared as various subjects under the influence of ideology and established a knowledge discourse, and the various subjects continued to divide and combine, but they formed historic convergence under the banner of anti-Japanese struggle and national liberation, and fought together for the great victory of China’s anti-Japanese war and global anti-fascist wars. The establishment of the subjectivity of Korean exiles shows a series of unique features and values. First of all, Shin Chaeho and Shin Gyusik’s “spiritual ego,” “conscientious ego” played vital roles in establishing the subjectivity not only in philosophical thought but also in fighting practice. Secondly, among the national subjectivity, double subjectivity and multiple subjectivity of Korean exiles, the national subjectivity directly influences the establishment of double subjectivity and multiple subjectivity. Therefore, the goal was to realize the nation-state imagination-liberation and freedom of the people, based on not only dual subjectivity and multiple subjectivity, but also the national subjectivity. Next, the Chinese experiences of Korean exiles played a crucial role in establishing their East Asian recognition and subjectivity. Their experiences in China accelerated and sublimated the mainland experiences, and the discourse environment in China prepared the acceptance and creation of new ideas, and went on to face up to the world peace issues. The Korean exiles have built national discourse, anti-Japanese discourse and national discourse through China’s “discussion ground,” which has led to the overthrow of imperial and colonial discourse. The Korean exiles’ recognition of East Asia and the establishment of their subjectivity are vivid records of the novelty and revolutionary nature of the intellectual discourse-the spiritual values of East Asia in the first half of the 20th century.