阿爾泰諸語(Altaic languages) 數詞의 一樣相 ―10單位 數詞 形成法을 中心으로―
On the Formation of the Numerals of Tens in Altaic Languages
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study describes how the numerals of tens in Altaic languages are formed, and consider whether the methods used were inherent to those languages or introduced by some other factors. One of the outstanding features of numeral formation in Korean, which is shared by some other Altaic languages, is that the numerals of tens from 20 through 50, i.e., 20, 30, 40 and 50, are formed in a way which is different from that used in forming the numerals of tens from 60 through 90, i.e., 60, 70, 80 and 90. The formation of the numerals of tens shows that they are introduced into the languages by suppletion, not by derivation from their basic single-digit numerals of two through five. If it is true that those numerals of 20 through 50 are results of suppletion in languages like Turkic, Tungusic, or Korean languages, we may conclude that the methods of numeral formation in Mongolian languages (which derive all the numerals from the single-digit numbers) are the most conservative ones, because in most Indo- European, Semitic, and Sino-Tibetan languages, all the numerals of tens from 20 through 90 have forms derived from the single-digit numerals of two through nine. It would then be not unreasonable to think that the numerals from 60 through 90 in some Turkic and Tungusic languages and in Korean were not produced by the inherent system of those Altaic languages, but by loans from the relevant languages they came across in the course of ethnic contacts in some later periods.
Abstract
This study describes how the numerals of tens in Altaic languages are formed, and consider whether the methods used were inherent to those languages or introduced by some other factors. One of the outstanding features of numeral formation in Korean, which is shared by some other Altaic languages, is that the numerals of tens from 20 through 50, i.e., 20, 30, 40 and 50, are formed in a way which is different from that used in forming the numerals of tens from 60 through 90, i.e., 60, 70, 80 and 90. The formation of the numerals of tens shows that they are introduced into the languages by suppletion, not by derivation from their basic single-digit numerals of two through five. If it is true that those numerals of 20 through 50 are results of suppletion in languages like Turkic, Tungusic, or Korean languages, we may conclude that the methods of numeral formation in Mongolian languages (which derive all the numerals from the single-digit numbers) are the most conservative ones, because in most Indo- European, Semitic, and Sino-Tibetan languages, all the numerals of tens from 20 through 90 have forms derived from the single-digit numerals of two through nine. It would then be not unreasonable to think that the numerals from 60 through 90 in some Turkic and Tungusic languages and in Korean were not produced by the inherent system of those Altaic languages, but by loans from the relevant languages they came across in the course of ethnic contacts in some later periods.
참고문헌 (33)
- 金東昭, "數詞, ≪中世韓國語槪說≫", pp.179~181 (2002), 大邱가톨릭大學校 出版部
- 金東昭, "東亞細亞 諸言語와 韓國語 ―韓國語 數詞의 對照言語學的 硏究", 語文學, 83, pp.1~28 (2004), 韓國語文學會
- 金東昭, "韓國語特質論" (2005), 正林社
- 金東昭, "韓國語의 歷史" (2007), 正林社
- 宋基中, "國語와 阿爾泰諸語 ―數詞體系의 比較 可能性을 中心으로―", 第3回 國際學術會議論文集, pp.645~665 (1985), 韓國精神文化硏究院
- 宋基中, "基本數詞의 比較, ≪歷史比較言語學과 國語系統論≫", pp.121~129 (2003), 集文堂
- 柳元秀, "元朝秘史" (2006), 四季節
- 石田幹之助, "女眞語硏究の新資料, ≪桑原博士還曆記念東洋史論叢≫", pp.1271~1323 (1931), 弘文堂書房
- 龜井孝, "言語學大辭典 第1-6卷" (1988), 三省堂
- 松本克己, "世界言語の數詞體系とその普遍的基盤", 月刊言語, 337, pp.22~29 (1999), 大修館
- 編輯組, "中國少數民族語言簡志叢書" (1980), 民族出版社
- 高爾?, "塔吉克語簡志" (1985), 民族出版社
- 劉照雄, "東鄕語簡志, ≪中國少數民族語言簡志叢書≫" (1981), 民族出版社
- 淸格爾泰, "蒙古語語法" (1991), 內蒙古人民出版社
- Gabain, A. von, "Altt?kische Grammatik,3 Auflage" (1974), Otto Harrassowitz
- Poppe, N, "Introduction to Altaic Linguistics" (1965), Otto Harrassowitz
- Ramstedt, G. J, "Uber die Zahlworter der altaischen Sprachen", JSFOu, 24, pp.1~24 (1907), Helsingissa: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura
- Ramstedt, G. J, "Einfrung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft, II. Formenlehre, Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Pentti Aalto" (1952), Suomalais Ugrilainen Seura
- Tekin, T, "A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic,Uralic and Altaic Series 69" (1968), Indiana University
- Аврорин, В. А, "Грамматика нанайского языка, Том. первый" (1959), Академии Наук СССР
- Андреев, И. А, "Чувашско-Русский словарь" (1961), Государственное издательство иностранных и национальных словарей
- Баскаков, Н. А, "Алтайская семья языков и её изучение" (1981), Наука
- Баскаков, Н. А, "Северные диалекты алтайского(ойр отского)языка" (1985), Наука
- Мескутов, В, "Туркменско-Русскийучебныйсловарь" (1988), Русский язык
- Рассадин, В. И, "Фонетика и лексика Тофаларского языка" (1971), Бурятское книжное
- Суник, О. П, "Ульчский Язык,Исследования и материалы", Наука, ~ (1985)
- Суюнчев, Х. И, "Карачаево-балкарско-Русский словарь" (1989), Русский язык
- Тенишев, Э. Р, "Сравнительно-историческя грамматика тюркских языков,Морфология" (1988), Наука
- Тодаева, Б. Х, "Дагурский язык" (1986), Наука
- Убрятова, Е. И, "Язык норильских долган" (1985), Наука
- Цинциус, В. И, "Сравнительныйсловарь Тунгусо-Маньчжурских языков, Материалы к этимологическому словарю, Том I" (1975), Наука
- Цинциус, В. И, "Негидальский Язык,Исследования и материалы" (1982), Наука
- Цыганенко, Г. П, "Этимологическийк словарь русского языка" (1989), Радянс'ка школа