본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

알타이어족 몽골어파 수사(數詞) 체계 분석

Analysis on the Numeral System of Altaic Mongol Languages

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study compares and analyzes the numeral system of various languages from Mongolian denomination, Dongxiang denomination, Moghol denomination, and Daur denomination which belong to Mongol languages. In Mongol denomination, the basic numerals of ancient written Mongolian, Mongolian, Oirat, and Buryat are quite similar in terms of sound and form. Ordinal numeral suffixes of ancient written Mongolian, Mongolian, and Oirat are quite similar while those of Kalmykia and Buryat matched for initials, however differed from each other for sound and form. Unlike Mongol denomination, Dongxiang denomination involves the deletion of final consonant ‘-n’ in numeral 1 and the deletion of the initial ‘b’ from the basic decuple numeral suffix ‘–ban.’ The basic form of the decuple numeral suffix is ‘-an’, which is the same as the Mongolian denomination, but ordinal numeral marker suffixes are different; ‘-da’ for Dongxiang and Mongolian, ‘-dar’ for Buryat, and ‘-nɛ’ for Bao’an. Sera Uighur has the characteristics of Dongxiang denomination on phonetic level, however, prominent characteristics of Mongolian denomination on grammatic level, and therefore, is placed in the intermediate position between Mongolian denomination and Dongxiang denomination. Six Too numerals of Too denomination have been transmitted and they are similar to the numerals of other Mongolian languages in terms of sound and form, take the ‘root+suffix’ structure, and are estimated to have made full many of Persian numerals. The numerals of Daur language of Daur denomination show many characteristics of Mongolian denomination, but ordinal numeral marker suffixes follow the characteristics of Dongxiang denomination. The numerals that underwent the least changes in terms of sound of form in Mongolian languages are 3, 5, 7 and this is related with the idea of numerals of all Mongol races. Each number has special symbolic meaning; 3 for the view of three worlds in shamanism, 5 for Yin-Yang and the Five Elements, and 7 for the cycles of the moon.

Abstract

This study compares and analyzes the numeral system of various languages from Mongolian denomination, Dongxiang denomination, Moghol denomination, and Daur denomination which belong to Mongol languages. In Mongol denomination, the basic numerals of ancient written Mongolian, Mongolian, Oirat, and Buryat are quite similar in terms of sound and form. Ordinal numeral suffixes of ancient written Mongolian, Mongolian, and Oirat are quite similar while those of Kalmykia and Buryat matched for initials, however differed from each other for sound and form. Unlike Mongol denomination, Dongxiang denomination involves the deletion of final consonant ‘-n’ in numeral 1 and the deletion of the initial ‘b’ from the basic decuple numeral suffix ‘–ban.’ The basic form of the decuple numeral suffix is ‘-an’, which is the same as the Mongolian denomination, but ordinal numeral marker suffixes are different; ‘-da’ for Dongxiang and Mongolian, ‘-dar’ for Buryat, and ‘-nɛ’ for Bao’an. Sera Uighur has the characteristics of Dongxiang denomination on phonetic level, however, prominent characteristics of Mongolian denomination on grammatic level, and therefore, is placed in the intermediate position between Mongolian denomination and Dongxiang denomination. Six Too numerals of Too denomination have been transmitted and they are similar to the numerals of other Mongolian languages in terms of sound and form, take the ‘root+suffix’ structure, and are estimated to have made full many of Persian numerals. The numerals of Daur language of Daur denomination show many characteristics of Mongolian denomination, but ordinal numeral marker suffixes follow the characteristics of Dongxiang denomination. The numerals that underwent the least changes in terms of sound of form in Mongolian languages are 3, 5, 7 and this is related with the idea of numerals of all Mongol races. Each number has special symbolic meaning; 3 for the view of three worlds in shamanism, 5 for Yin-Yang and the Five Elements, and 7 for the cycles of the moon.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 이성규, "현대 몽골어와 한국어의 문법 비교 연구" (2009), 한국문화사
  2. 박원길, "유라시아 초원제국의 샤머니즘" (2001), 민속원
  3. 배영기, "한국인의 수사상(數思想) 고찰", 고조선단군학, 15, pp.289~318 (2006), 고조선단군학회
  4. 송기중, "역사비교언어학과 국어계통론" (2003), 집문당
  5. 우실하, "동북아 샤머니즘 성수(聖數:3.6.9.81)의 기원에 대하여", 고조선단군학, 10, pp.205~240 (2004), 고조선단군학회
  6. 조규태, "한국어 수사의 어원과 어형 변화에 대하여", 어문학, (94), pp.81~117 (2006), 한국어문학회
  7. 한호상, "국학의 기본학" (1977), 학문사
  8. 히사오, 고마츠, "중앙유라시아의 역사" (2005), 소나무
  9. Kotwicz, W, "Contributions aux etudes altaiques" (1930), Lwow
  10. Ramstedt, G., "Uber die Zahlwörter der altaishen Sprachen", JSFOu, 24 (1907)
  11. Бобровников, А. А, "Грамматика монгольско-калмыцкого языка" (1849), Казань
  12. Дарбеева, А. А, "Языки мира: Монгольские языки. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Японский язык. Корейский язык", pp.37~50 (1997), ИНДРИК
  13. Кузьменков, Е. А, "Могольский язык. Языки мира:Монгольские языки. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Японский язык. Корейский язык", pp.87~97 (1997), ИНДРИК
  14. Лувсандэгдэв, А, "Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Японский язык. Корейский язык", pp.144~147 (1997), ИНДРИК
  15. Орловская, М. Н, "Языки мира:Монгольские языки. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Японский язык. Корейский язык", pp.18~28 (1997), ИНДРИК
  16. Поппе, Н. Н., "Языковедные проблемы по числительным" (1927), Изд-во ин-та литератур запада и востока при ЛГУ
  17. Пюрбеев, Г. Ц, "Языки мира: Монгольские языки. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Японский язык. Корейский язык", pp.73~86 (1997), ИНДРИК
  18. Рассадин, В. И, "Язык сойотов Бурятии" (2012), Изд. Элиста
  19. Санжеев, Г. Д, "Грамматика бурят-монгольского языка" (1941), АН СССР
  20. Тодаева, Б. Х, "Грамматика современного монгольского языка" (1951), АНСССР
  21. Тодаева, Б. Х, "Монгорский язык" (1973), Наука
  22. Тодаева, Б. Х, "Языки мира: Монгольские языки. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Японский язык. Корейскийязык", pp.29~36 (1997), ИНДРИК
  23. Хундаева, Е. О, "Символика монгольских чисел" (2000), Изд-во БГУ
  24. Яхонтова, Н. С, "Ойратский литературный язык XVII века", pp.132~143 (1996), Восточ. лит
  25. Яхонтова, Н. С, "Языки мира: Монгольские языки. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Японский язык. Корейский язык", pp.10~18 (1997), ИНДРИК

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)