임진왜란 직전 조선의 군사대응책에 관한 연구
Study Regarding Choseon's Countermeasures on the brink of Im-jin War
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study originates from curiosity as to why Choseon, the country that prospered for 200 years after its foundation, had to helplessly go through neighboring Japan's invasion, had its capital captured in less than about 20 days. Accordingly, the purpose of the study is to get to the bottom of how Choseon analyzed the possibility of the war with Japan and political situation at the time through indications of war and intelligence activities and why the state considered Japan's invasion was off the table before the outbreak of the war. Furthermore, the study delves into at which point Choseon recognized the possibility of a war and started preparing for it, and how effectively, especially from a military perspective, efforts to deter the war and military readiness were pursued. The study shows that Japan, the country that started the war, was well-equipped with mighty military with the closure of 100-years-long Sengoku Period. In contrast, Choseon was too weak and was hardly prepared to make a response. Only after Choseon missions to Japan came back from Japan, did it actually start to grasp situational awareness and prepare itself for the war. However, this, too, did not last long due to factional strifes over party interests and the escalating grievances of its people. The whole country ushered in a war without practical preparations accompanied by transition into the war readiness posture. From a perspective that history repeats itself, Im-jin War is considered to be still giving us invaluable lessons in terms of security environments surrounding the Korean peninsula. The peninsula is in dire need to make a clear-cut judgments and strategic assessments not only on its neighboring nations, but also on the North's political affairs We must equip ourselves with situational awareness and collect national power.
Abstract
The study originates from curiosity as to why Choseon, the country that prospered for 200 years after its foundation, had to helplessly go through neighboring Japan's invasion, had its capital captured in less than about 20 days. Accordingly, the purpose of the study is to get to the bottom of how Choseon analyzed the possibility of the war with Japan and political situation at the time through indications of war and intelligence activities and why the state considered Japan's invasion was off the table before the outbreak of the war. Furthermore, the study delves into at which point Choseon recognized the possibility of a war and started preparing for it, and how effectively, especially from a military perspective, efforts to deter the war and military readiness were pursued. The study shows that Japan, the country that started the war, was well-equipped with mighty military with the closure of 100-years-long Sengoku Period. In contrast, Choseon was too weak and was hardly prepared to make a response. Only after Choseon missions to Japan came back from Japan, did it actually start to grasp situational awareness and prepare itself for the war. However, this, too, did not last long due to factional strifes over party interests and the escalating grievances of its people. The whole country ushered in a war without practical preparations accompanied by transition into the war readiness posture. From a perspective that history repeats itself, Im-jin War is considered to be still giving us invaluable lessons in terms of security environments surrounding the Korean peninsula. The peninsula is in dire need to make a clear-cut judgments and strategic assessments not only on its neighboring nations, but also on the North's political affairs We must equip ourselves with situational awareness and collect national power.
참고문헌 (34)
- 국방대학교, "안보관계 용어집" (2004)
- 민족문화추진회, "선조수정실록 제21～25권" (1987), 도문사
- 박영규, "한권으로 읽는 조선왕조실록" (1996), 도서출판 들녘
- 설민석, "설민석의 조선왕조실록" (2016), 도서출판 세계사
- 육군교육사령부, "전쟁지도 이론과 실제" (1990)
- 이규종, "단숨에 읽는 조선왕조실록" (2016), 예감출판사
- 이성무, "조선왕조사" (1998), 동방미디어(주)
- 이승화, "다시 쓰는 징비록 조명일 삼국전쟁" (2019), 좋은 땅 출판사
- 이장희, "임진왜란사연구" (1999), 아세아문화사
- 합동참모본부, "합동교범 5-0『합동기획』" (2018)
- 김강녕, "임진왜란의 배경․원인과 현대적 함의", 군사발전연구, 8(2) (2014)
- 김강녕, "이순신의 수군전략과 전술", 이순신 연구논총, (17) (2012)
- 김강식, "壬辰倭亂을 바라보는 한국과 일본의 시각", 지역과 역사, (38), pp.5~47 (2016), 부경역사연구소[DOI]
- 김경록, "조선전기 동북아의 정세와 전쟁", 군사, (110), pp.203~239 (2019), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 김경록, "임진왜란 시기 수군지휘관 이순신과 원균의 리더십 비교", 이순신 연구논총, (11) (2009)
- 김경태, "李睟光의 芝峯類說에 나타난 임진왜란 인식과 방어대책", 역사와 실학, (67), pp.77~109 (2018), 역사실학회
- 김성우, "임진왜란 시기 관군은 왜 약했는가?", 역사와 현실, (87), pp.495~539 (2013), 한국역사연구회
- 김성한, "'전쟁은 없다’고 단정한 조선, 전쟁준비에 血眼이 된 일본", 한국논단 (2012)
- 김영환, "壬辰戰爭期韓․中․日3국의 戰爭指導와 軍事作戰에 대한 比較硏究", 박사, pp.2018
- 김태훈, "에도시대 초기 일본의 임진왜란 인식 - 林羅山의 『豐臣秀吉譜』를 중심으로 -", 韓國史學史學報, (34), pp.67~93 (2016), 한국사학사학회
- 김현기, "전술적 측면에서 본 이순신 사상", 이순신 연구논총, (12) (2004)
- 나종우, "왜란의 발발과 조선의 청병외교", 군사, (60), pp.1~30 (2006), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 박영준, "북한의 전쟁위협 평가와 한국 대북전략의 방향: 직접접근전략과 간접접근전략의 병용", 국가전략, 21(1), pp.5~38 (2015), 세종연구소[DOI]
- 박휘락, "전시 작전통제권 전환과 국가의 전쟁수행: 개념과 과업의 분석", 국제정치논총, 49(1), pp.375~400 (2009), 한국국제정치학회
- 박희봉, "임진왜란에 관한 새로운 증거와 의미: 참전일본군 및 손실자수", 국가정책연구, 28(4), pp.1~33 (2014), 국가정책연구소[DOI]
- 신윤호, "임진왜란 시기 전라도수군의 편제와 운용", 역사학연구, (72), pp.67~107 (2018), 호남사학회
- 윤경하, "壬辰倭亂 직전 戰爭情報와 조선의 對應", 江原史學, (26), pp.21~45 (2014), 강원사학회
- 이민수, "전시 작전지휘권 전환 대비 전쟁지도 연구 - 6ㆍ25전쟁을 중심으로 -", 군사연구, (134), pp.151~185 (2012), 육군군사연구소[DOI]
- 이민웅, "이순신 정론Ⅱ", 이순신 연구논총, (17) (2012)
- 이상훈, "임진왜란 전 이순신의 행적과 가문의 상황", 이순신 연구논총, (10) (2008)
- 임원빈, "첨단 조선 수군과 이순신 제독의 혁신", 이순신 연구논총, (28) (2017)
- 조신호, "이순신학(學)의 정립과 그 사상적 배경", 이순신 연구논총, (23) (2015)
- 하우봉, "김성일의 일본인식과 귀국보고", 한일관계사연구, (43), pp.127~173 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 한문종, "壬辰倭亂 직전의 국내정세와 韓日關係", 인문과학연구, (21), pp.223~243 (2009), 인문과학연구소