본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임진왜란시 청주성 및 금산성 전투의 군사사학적(軍事史學的) 고찰

Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress Battle During the Imjin War in Terms of Military Historic Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims at examining Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress battle during the Imjin War in terms of the ‘military historic’ perspective. It is on the battle by Jo Heon and voluntary civilian troops who fought against the Japanese Army at Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress in order to learn the military historic perspective of those battles and its lesions. While majority official troops ran away from the Japanese Army or were very passive in the battle to save life, the voluntary civilian troops made every effort to defeat the Japanese Army under the supervision of Jo Heon even though they consisted of various social classes. As a result, the people relied more on the voluntary civilian troops than they did on the official troops which attracted many more civilian volunteers. It not only enabled Jo Heon’s troop to defeat the Japanese troops at Cheongju Fortress but also made all civilian troops died at Geumsan Fortress battle which has no comparable case in the world war history. The strategic and military historic meaning of Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress battles are significant. The details are as follows. ① The battle demonstrated the important role of the leader ② The importance of the secure of strategic point ③ Integrated battle between people, public and military ④ The secure of war time mobilization system and the significance of civil-military strategy were raised. On the other hand, the poor points from the point of military history, ① Lack of preparation for battle ② Lack of understanding the strategy ③ Disputes between official troop and voluntary civilian troop ④ Lack of arm system, strategy text and training ⑤ Lack of battle support and war time mobility system. Cheongju Fortress battle and Geumsan Fortress battle are triumphant battles in terms of strategy and military by Jo Heon and voluntary civilian troops. When these two battles are an investigation, Joseon was deeply inclined to toadyism to Ming to protect the country rather than to reinforce the self-defense. Today’s atmosphere in the Korean peninsula is not that different. The 4 major countries repeatedly attempt to cause territorial disputes and history distortion. Therefore, we have to make every effort to create a powerful military unit for victory by bearing the maxim “prepare a war if you want peace” in mind.

Abstract

This study aims at examining Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress battle during the Imjin War in terms of the ‘military historic’ perspective. It is on the battle by Jo Heon and voluntary civilian troops who fought against the Japanese Army at Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress in order to learn the military historic perspective of those battles and its lesions. While majority official troops ran away from the Japanese Army or were very passive in the battle to save life, the voluntary civilian troops made every effort to defeat the Japanese Army under the supervision of Jo Heon even though they consisted of various social classes. As a result, the people relied more on the voluntary civilian troops than they did on the official troops which attracted many more civilian volunteers. It not only enabled Jo Heon’s troop to defeat the Japanese troops at Cheongju Fortress but also made all civilian troops died at Geumsan Fortress battle which has no comparable case in the world war history. The strategic and military historic meaning of Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress battles are significant. The details are as follows. ① The battle demonstrated the important role of the leader ② The importance of the secure of strategic point ③ Integrated battle between people, public and military ④ The secure of war time mobilization system and the significance of civil-military strategy were raised. On the other hand, the poor points from the point of military history, ① Lack of preparation for battle ② Lack of understanding the strategy ③ Disputes between official troop and voluntary civilian troop ④ Lack of arm system, strategy text and training ⑤ Lack of battle support and war time mobility system. Cheongju Fortress battle and Geumsan Fortress battle are triumphant battles in terms of strategy and military by Jo Heon and voluntary civilian troops. When these two battles are an investigation, Joseon was deeply inclined to toadyism to Ming to protect the country rather than to reinforce the self-defense. Today’s atmosphere in the Korean peninsula is not that different. The 4 major countries repeatedly attempt to cause territorial disputes and history distortion. Therefore, we have to make every effort to create a powerful military unit for victory by bearing the maxim “prepare a war if you want peace” in mind.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "고대일록", ~
  2. "선조실록", ~
  3. "선조수정실록", ~
  4. "중봉집", ~
  5. 권오국, "지정학적 관점에서 바라본 남북한의 생존전략 : 1945~2000", 박사, 국제정치, pp.2010
  6. 김용덕, "중봉 조헌 연구" (1977), 을유문화사
  7. 육군본부, "군사사연구방법론" (2010), 육군본부
  8. 육군본부, "군사용어사전" (2006), 국군인쇄창
  9. 육군본부, "전술" (2005), 국군인쇄창
  10. 육군본부, "지상군 기본교리" (2011), 국군인쇄창
  11. 육군본부, "한국군사사5-조선전기1" (2012), 육군본부
  12. 이석린, "임란의병장 조헌연구" (1993), 신구문화사
  13. 조희진, "조헌 선생" (1994), 한국독서지도회
  14. 이종학, "한국군사사 연구" (2010), 충남대학교출판부
  15. 육군본부, "야전교범 3-0-1 군사용어사전" (2006), 국군인쇄창
  16. 육군본부, "야전교범 0 지상군기본교리" (2011), 국군인쇄창
  17. 장병옥, "(임진전란을 통하여 본)의병항쟁사" (1991), 한원
  18. 곽호제, "任辰倭亂期 湖西義兵 硏究", 박사, 한국사, pp.1999
  19. 곽호제, "임진왜란기 청주성전투의 의병장 연구", 10 (1998), 충남사학회
  20. 곽호제, "임진왜란기 이치대첩이 의의와 재검토", 12 (2000), 충남사학회
  21. 길병옥, "한국군 민사작전의 발전방향 및 향휴과제", 군사논단, (54) (2008)
  22. 金武男, "임진왜란때의 금산성 전투에 관한 연구", 석사, 역사, pp.1984
  23. 김진수, "임진왜란 초기 경상좌도 조선군의 대응양상에 대한 검토-경상좌병사 박진(朴晉)과 권응수(權應銖)의 활동을 중심으로 -", 군사, (84), pp.1~27 (2012), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  24. 金 弘, "壬辰倭亂의 軍事史的 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.1993
  25. 나태종, "의병장 조헌과 금산성 전투의 재조명", 군사논단, (66) (2011)
  26. 박재광, "전쟁사를 다시 쓰게 한 조총", 과학기술, (12) (2006), 한국과학기술단체총연합회
  27. 李錫麟, "重峰趙憲 硏究", 박사, pp.1985
  28. 이석린, "임진왜란기 청주성전투와 의병활동", 11.12 (2000), 충북사학회
  29. 이영자, "栗谷의 道學思想과 重峰의 義理精神", 철학연구, 97, pp.193~214 (2006), 대한철학회
  30. 장병옥, "“금산성 전투”.『시사』", 안전보장 제192호, ~ (1986)
  31. 장영호, "무기체계 측면에서의 임진왜란 고찰", 군사발전연구 (2009), 조선대학교
  32. 주용성, "중봉 조헌의 실천철학 연구", 석사, 한국철학, pp.2009
  33. 최근묵, "임진왜란기 금산전투의 순절과 이치대첩에 대한 숭양" (2000), 충청사학회
  34. 최영희, "임란의병의 성격", 사학연구, 8 (1976), 한국사학회
  35. 허대영, "임진왜란 전후 조선의 전술 변화와 군사훈련의 전문화", 한국사론, 58 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)