월평의 형성 과정과 월평 방식의 변화 양상

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the formation of monthly-review and changeable aspects of critical method. The discourse of literature mentioned universal dimension of the literature in 1910s. But it didn't analyze contemporary situation of Chosun's literature. The monthly-review made contemporary literature the object of criticism. And the monthly-review lasted during 1920s. So to analyze the formation of monthly-review becomes a reference point for studying about literature criticism. This study describe a formation process of monthly-review three step. First this study focus on the early part of 1920s. The monthly-review of this period had been affected by extension of media. The monthly-review of this period tried to select a work which is the aesthetic value. Second this study attention to the year of 1925. In this year 『Gae-Byeok』 published serially the monthly-review and 『Chosunmundan』 began a meeting for a joint review. 『Gae-Byeok』 and 『Chosunmundan』 referred to each other. So the critics reflected on one's own criteria. In the middle of 1920s the critics of the monthly-review tried to convey one's own aesthetic judgement to other critics. So the critics use the common term. 'SilGam' is a typical case of commom term. 'SilGam' means not only reality but also visual vividness. 'SilGam' was interpreted to common sense of 1920s in this study. A different position of 'SilGam' made an argument about form and contents between Kim, Ki-jin and Park, Young-hee. In 1927, 『Chosunjikwang』 published serially the monthly-review. The objects of the monthly-review has been extended to literary world ‧ literary discourse ‧ drama and movies. But the monthly-review of 『Chosunjikwang』 normalized criticism of the work. So the monthly-review of 『Chosunjikwang』 could not explore a sense and feeling of the work.