신약성경 헬라어의 음역에서 다수의 원어들 가설 – 본문비평과 자료비평의 판단 기준에 대한 재고
Multiple Originals Hypothesis on Transliteration of New Testament Greek - Re-consideration of Criteria of Textual Criticism and Source Criticism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Many scholars have held an orthographical view of phonological variants of transliterated words from Semitic into Greek in the Four Gospels. The scholars have assumed that the single original spelling or the single original reading can be reconstructed. And they have tried to single out “the correct spelling” from “corrupted spellings” and “the right spelling” from “erroneous spellings.” This is based on the assumption that the correct spelling is the original spelling. This means that the single correct spelling has temporal priority in relation to textual criticism and source criticism. “The single original” hypothesis has functioned as criterion for textual criticism and source criticism. It is common, however, that the transliteration from a source language to a target language leads to phonological variants. I suggest four linguistic factors such as ① a different phonetic system, ② phonological representation caused by phonological rules, ③ phonetic change in the history of a language itself, and ④ the synchronic dialects of a language. If phonological variants can be explained by the four linguistic factors, all of them can be right spellings.Three cases can be illustrated: phonological variants of a local proper noun, Nazareth (Nazare,q), phonological variants of a personal proper noun, Elizabeth (VElisa,bet), and phonological variants of a transliterated sentence of the cry from the cross(hlihli lama zafqani; Mt 27:46, Mk 15:34). Six variants of Nazareth such as Nazara,, Nazara,q, Nazara,t, Nazare,d, Nazare,t, and Nazare,q are predictable, explainable, and acceptable. Five spellings of Elizabeth such as VElisa,bh, VElisa,be, VElisa,bet, VElisa,beq, and VEleisa,beq are predictable, explainable, and acceptable. And the phonological variants of hli hli lema sabacqani are predictable, explainable, and acceptable. The phonological variants of the three cases caused by the four linguistic factors imply that original spellings can be multiple. Transliteration from Semitic into Greek, in most cases, leads to phonological variants due to the four linguistic factors. Accordingly, when transliterated words of the Four Gospels are investigated, multiple originals hypothesis should be applied. This means that there is a need for textual criticism and source criticism to rethink the criterion that the single correct spelling has temporal priority.
Abstract
Many scholars have held an orthographical view of phonological variants of transliterated words from Semitic into Greek in the Four Gospels. The scholars have assumed that the single original spelling or the single original reading can be reconstructed. And they have tried to single out “the correct spelling” from “corrupted spellings” and “the right spelling” from “erroneous spellings.” This is based on the assumption that the correct spelling is the original spelling. This means that the single correct spelling has temporal priority in relation to textual criticism and source criticism. “The single original” hypothesis has functioned as criterion for textual criticism and source criticism. It is common, however, that the transliteration from a source language to a target language leads to phonological variants. I suggest four linguistic factors such as ① a different phonetic system, ② phonological representation caused by phonological rules, ③ phonetic change in the history of a language itself, and ④ the synchronic dialects of a language. If phonological variants can be explained by the four linguistic factors, all of them can be right spellings.Three cases can be illustrated: phonological variants of a local proper noun, Nazareth (Nazare,q), phonological variants of a personal proper noun, Elizabeth (VElisa,bet), and phonological variants of a transliterated sentence of the cry from the cross(hlihli lama zafqani; Mt 27:46, Mk 15:34). Six variants of Nazareth such as Nazara,, Nazara,q, Nazara,t, Nazare,d, Nazare,t, and Nazare,q are predictable, explainable, and acceptable. Five spellings of Elizabeth such as VElisa,bh, VElisa,be, VElisa,bet, VElisa,beq, and VEleisa,beq are predictable, explainable, and acceptable. And the phonological variants of hli hli lema sabacqani are predictable, explainable, and acceptable. The phonological variants of the three cases caused by the four linguistic factors imply that original spellings can be multiple. Transliteration from Semitic into Greek, in most cases, leads to phonological variants due to the four linguistic factors. Accordingly, when transliterated words of the Four Gospels are investigated, multiple originals hypothesis should be applied. This means that there is a need for textual criticism and source criticism to rethink the criterion that the single correct spelling has temporal priority.
참고문헌 (57)
- 이상일, "Jesus and Gospel Traditions in Bilingual Context: A Study in the Interdirectionality of Language", pp.7~ (2012), de Gruyter
- F. de Saussure, "Course in General Linguistics", pp.6~17 (1959), Philosophical Library
- N. Chomsky, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax", pp.3~ (1965), MIT
- E. Sapir, "Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech", pp.147~ (1921), Harcourt, Brace & Company
- William Labov, "Sociolinguistic Patterns", pp.186~ (1972), University of Pennsylvania Press
- Jack Chambers, "Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance", pp.12~ (1995), Blackwell
- W. Labov, "The Linguistic Variable as a Structural Unit", WLR, 3, pp.4~22 (1966)
- B. Westcott, "The New Testament in the Original Greek", pp.303~ (1896), Macmillan
- A. Souter, "The Text and Canon of the New Testament", pp.3~ (1954), Duckworth
- K. Aland, "The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism", pp.214~ (1989), Eerdmans
- A.F.J. Klijn, "In Search of the Original Text of Acts, In Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert", pp.103~ (1966), Abingdon
- J.H. Greenlee, "Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism", pp.1~ (1995), Hendrickson
- F. Hort, "Notes on Select Readings, In The New Testament in the Original Greek", pp.148~179 (1896), Macmillan
- H. Thackeray, "A Grammar of the Old Testament in Greek Vol. 1 Introduction,Orthography and Accidence", pp.71~139 (1909), Cambridge University Press
- A.T. Robertson, "A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research", pp.177~245 (1934), Broadman
- F. Blass, "A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature", pp.20~24 (1961), University of Chicago Press
- Leon Vaganay, "An Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism", pp.52~61 (1991), Cambridge University Press
- B. Metzger, "The Text of the New Testament: its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration", pp.186~206 (1992), Oxford University Press
- H. Leon, "The Jews of Ancient Rome", pp.87~ (1995), Hendrickson
- T. Ilan, "Lexicon of Jewish Names in Late Antiquity Part I Palestine 330 BCE–200 CE", pp.1~16 (2002), Mohr Siebeck
- E. Speiser, "The Pronunciation of Hebrew According to the Transliteration in the Hexapla", JQR, 16, pp.360~ (1926)
- E. Speiser, "The Pronunciation of Hebrew Based Chiefly on the Transliteration in the Hexapla", JQR, 23, pp.9~46 (1933)
- J. Barr, "The Variable Spellings of the Hebrew Bible", pp.194~ (1989), Oxford University Press
- A. Millard, "Variable Spelling in Hebrew and Other Ancient Text", JTS, 42, pp.106~115 (1991)
- R. Brown, "The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke", pp.209~ (1993), Doubleday
- P.J. Williams, "The Linguistic Background to Jesus’ Dereliction Cry (Matthew 27:46; Mark 15:34), In The New Testament in its First Century Setting: Essays on Context and Background in Honour of B.W. Winter on His 65th Birthday", pp.1~12 (2004), Eerdmans
- M. Leiwo, "From Contact to Mixture: Bilingual Inscriptions from Italy, In Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text", pp.182~ (2002), Oxford University Press
- B. Weiss, "Das Matthäusevangelium und seine Lukas-Parallelen", pp.121~ (1876), Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses
- C.M. Tuckett, "Luke 4,16-30, Isaiah and Q, In Logia: Les Paroles de Jésus– the Sayings of Jesus Mémorial Joseph Coppens", pp.344~ (1982), Leuven University Press
- H. Holtzmann, "Die Synoptiker– Die Apostelgeschichte", pp.70~ (1889), J.C.B. Mohr
- M. Goulder, "Two Significant Minor Agreements (Mat. 4:13 Par.; Mat.26:67-68 Par.)", NovT, 45, pp.368~ (2003)
- B. Weiss, "Die vier Evangelien", pp.30~ (1900), Hinrichs
- F.C. Burkitt, "The Syriac Forms of New Testament Proper Names", Proceedings of the British Academy, 5, pp.392~ (1912)
- G.D. Kilpatrick, "The Origins of the Gospel According to St. Matthew", pp.50~ (1946), Oxford University Press
- J.A. Fitzmyer, "The Gospel According to Luke 2 Vols", pp.530~ (1985), Doubleday
- C.M. Tuckett, "Q and the History of Early Christianity: Studies on Q", pp.228~ (1996), T & T Clark
- M. Wise, "Nazarene, In Dictionary of Jesus and Gospels", pp.573~574 (1992), IVP
- G.F. Moore, "Nazarene and Nazareth, In The Beginnings of Christianity Part I The Acts of the Apostles Vol. 1. Prolegomena I", pp.427~ (1939), Macmillan and Co
- J.K. Zenner, "Philologisches zum Namen ‘Nazareth’", Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie, 18(1), pp.744~ (1894)
- G. Dalman, "Sacred Sites and Ways: Studies in the Topography of the Gospels", pp.59~ (1935), SPCK
- H. Cadbury, "Four Features of Lucan Style, In Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert", pp.91~ (1966), Abingdon
- K. Elliott, "Essays and Studies in New Testament Textual Criticism", pp.119~ (1992), Edicionesel Almendro
- E. Hatch, "Concordance to the Septuagint and Other Greek Versions of the Old Testament: Including the Apocryphal Books", pp.56~58, Baker
- F. Zimmermann, "The Last Words of Jesus", JBL, 66, pp.465~466 (1947)
- V. Taylor, "The Gospel According to St.Mark", pp.593~ (1952), Macmillan
- R.H. Gundry, "The Use of the Old Testament in St. Matthew’s Gospel: with Special Reference to the Messianic Hope", pp.63~66 (1967), E.J. Brill
- M.Hooker, "The Gospel According to St. Mark", pp.376~ (1981), A&CBlack
- D.J. Moo, "The Old Testament in the Gospel Passion Narratives", pp.264~268 (1983), Almond Press
- R.E. Brown, "The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave: A Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels 2 Vols", pp.1051~1053 (1994), Doubleday
- A. Menzies, "The Earliest Gospel: A Historical Study of the Gospel According to Mark", pp.280~ (1901), Macmillan
- C.H. Turner, "Western Readings in the Second Half of St. Mark’s Gospel", JTS, 29, pp.12~ (1927)
- H. Birkeland, "The Language of Jesus", pp.25~26 (1954), I Kommisjon Hos Jacob Dybwad
- C.E.B.Cranfield, "The Gospel According to Saint Mark", pp.458~ (1959), Cambridge University Press
- D.E. Nineham, "The Gospel of St. Mark", pp.429~ (1963), Penguin
- C.C. Caragonis, "The Development of Greek and the New Testament: Morphology, Syntax, Phonology, and Textual Transmission", pp.369~370 (2004), Mohr Siebeck
- A.H. McNeile, "The Gospel According to St. Matthew: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Indices", pp.421~ (1915), Macmillan
- M. Rehm, "Eli Eli Lama Sabacthani", BZ, 2, pp.275~ (1958)