본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

"Faith of Christ"와 "Faith in Christ": 제로섬(zero-sum)관계인가? 윈윈(win-win)관계인가? - 갈라디아서의 PISTIS CRISTOU를 중심으로-

Faith of Christ and Faith in Christ : In zero-sum relationship or win-win relationship? - A re-consideration of PISTIS CRISTOU in Galatians-

김형근
한국복음주의신약학회 (Korean Evangelical Society of New Testament Studies)|2012.12|신약연구 (Korean Evangelical New Testament Sudies)|제11권 제4호|pp. 889-928|DOI 10.24229/kents.2012.11.4.005

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

그리스도에 대한 믿음그리스도의 신실함faith in Christ칭의의 근거칭의 적용의 수단통전적 구원론Faithfulness of Christground of justificationmeans of application of justificationholistic salvation

초록

One of the most controversial issues in contemporary Pauline theology has been whether the phrase pi,stij Cristou/ refers to faith in Christ (objective genitive) or faith of Christ (= faithfulness of Christ : subjective genitive). This article, however exploring not only the meaning of four usages (2:16[ 2], 20; 3:22) of pi,stij Cristou/ but also the subject of 13 usages of noun pi,stij with no genitive modifier in Galatians 3, attempts to ask what kind of relationship between the two motifs, faith of Christ and faith in Christ can be built. In each instance of pi,stij Cristou/, Paul’s principle of justification is to be presented; By God one is to be justified on the grounds of faith of Christ (pi,stij Cristou/), through one’s faith in Christ. Namely, the justification that has been achieved by the redemption of Christ, that is, the faithfulness of Christ is to be applied to one by way of one’s faith in Christ, that is, one’s faith in the faithfulness of Christ. It is obvious that Paul’s principle of justification is to be firmly established by being interwoven with the two motifs. The survey of 13 usages of noun pi,stij in Galatians 3 has shown that in some verses (vv. 11, 12, 23, 24,and 25) Jesus Christ is described as the subject of pi,stij, and especially in vv. 11 and 12 the subject of pi,stij is expanded from Christ to believers (Jews and Gentiles) including Abraham. The survey led to an universal principle of justification in Galatians that human beings are to be justified through their faith in faith of Christ , which means that faith of Christ is the exclusive grounds of God’s justification for man, and man s faith is the exclusive means of application of God’s justification to man. It is thus very likely that faith of Christ and faith in Christ are not to be separated but to be united each other to form a holistic salvation of justification in which belief and fidelity , confession and exercise are respectively to be one. Consequently, the organic solidarity between the two motifs constitutes the salvation of justification that is based on Christology and thus supports the sovereignty of God’s grace that may be in danger of being nullified by the Christianity of exclusive support for ‘faith in Christ’ alone. Finally, this article shows that faith of Christ and faith in Christ are not in zero-sum relationship but in win-win relationship with each other. What then is thought to be wrong with the subjective reading of pi,stij Cristou/ in Galatians?

Abstract

One of the most controversial issues in contemporary Pauline theology has been whether the phrase pi,stij Cristou/ refers to faith in Christ (objective genitive) or faith of Christ (= faithfulness of Christ : subjective genitive). This article, however exploring not only the meaning of four usages (2:16[ 2], 20; 3:22) of pi,stij Cristou/ but also the subject of 13 usages of noun pi,stij with no genitive modifier in Galatians 3, attempts to ask what kind of relationship between the two motifs, faith of Christ and faith in Christ can be built. In each instance of pi,stij Cristou/, Paul’s principle of justification is to be presented; By God one is to be justified on the grounds of faith of Christ (pi,stij Cristou/), through one’s faith in Christ. Namely, the justification that has been achieved by the redemption of Christ, that is, the faithfulness of Christ is to be applied to one by way of one’s faith in Christ, that is, one’s faith in the faithfulness of Christ. It is obvious that Paul’s principle of justification is to be firmly established by being interwoven with the two motifs. The survey of 13 usages of noun pi,stij in Galatians 3 has shown that in some verses (vv. 11, 12, 23, 24,and 25) Jesus Christ is described as the subject of pi,stij, and especially in vv. 11 and 12 the subject of pi,stij is expanded from Christ to believers (Jews and Gentiles) including Abraham. The survey led to an universal principle of justification in Galatians that human beings are to be justified through their faith in faith of Christ , which means that faith of Christ is the exclusive grounds of God’s justification for man, and man s faith is the exclusive means of application of God’s justification to man. It is thus very likely that faith of Christ and faith in Christ are not to be separated but to be united each other to form a holistic salvation of justification in which belief and fidelity , confession and exercise are respectively to be one. Consequently, the organic solidarity between the two motifs constitutes the salvation of justification that is based on Christology and thus supports the sovereignty of God’s grace that may be in danger of being nullified by the Christianity of exclusive support for ‘faith in Christ’ alone. Finally, this article shows that faith of Christ and faith in Christ are not in zero-sum relationship but in win-win relationship with each other. What then is thought to be wrong with the subjective reading of pi,stij Cristou/ in Galatians?

참고문헌 (45)

  1. J. Haußleiter, "Der Glaube Jesu Christi und der christliche Glaube", NKZ, 2, pp.109~145 (1891)
  2. G. Howard, "Notes and Observation on the ‘Faith of Christ’", HTR, 60, pp.460~ (1967)
  3. 랑게(J. P. Lange), "The Epistle of Paul to the Romans", pp.129~ (1869), Charles Scriber’s Sons
  4. R.B. Hays, "The Faith of Jesus Christ: The Narrative Substructure of Galatians 3:1-4:11", pp.142~148 (2002), Eerdmans
  5. D. A. Campbell, "Romans 1:17-A Crux Intepretum for the PISTIS CRISTOU Debate", JBL, 113(2), pp.265~285 (1994)
  6. D.A. Campbell, "False Presupposition in the Debate: A Response to Brian Dodd", JBL, 116, pp.713~719 (1997)
  7. H. S. Choi, "PISTIS in Gal 5:5-6: Neglected Evidence for the Faithfulness of Christ", JBL, 124, pp.467~490 (2005)
  8. B. Dodd, "Romans 1:17-A CRUX INTERPRETUM for the Debate", JBL, 114, pp.470~473 (1995)
  9. 최갑종, "Pi,stij Cristou 구문을 어떻게 이해할 것인가? －로마서 1:16-17, 3:21-31, 4:1-25에 나타난 ‘믿음’과 '의'(義)에 대한 상관성 연구를 중심으로", 신약논단, 17(2), pp.357~394 (2010), 한국신약학회
  10. 최갑종, "'피스티스 크리스투'(P i s, t i j C r i s t o u", ), 어떻게 이해할 것인가?, 2011, pp.10(4), 911~940[DOI]
  11. 최흥식, "‘의롭게 됨’과 Pi,stij Cristou:", 갈라디아서를 중심으로, 2011, 30~43
  12. 박익수, "로마서 주석1", pp.326~328 (2008), 대한기독교서회
  13. 정연락, "바울에 있어서의 pistis kristou 문제서설", 신약논단, 2, pp.103~132 (1996), 한국신약학회
  14. D. M. Hay, "Pistis As ‘Ground For Faith’ In Hellenized Judaism and Paul", JBL, 108, pp.475~ (1989)
  15. D. R. Lindsay, "Josephus and Faith: Pi,stij and Pisteu,ein as Faith Terminology in the Writings of Flavius Josephus and in the New Testament", pp.53~107 (1993), E. J. Brill
  16. D. W. B. Robinson, "‘Faith of Jesus Christ’-a New Debate", RTR, 29, pp.76~ (1970)
  17. L. E. Keck, "‘Jesus’in Romans", JBL, 108(3), pp.454~ (1989)
  18. M. Barth, "The Faith of the Messiah", HeyJ, 19, pp.368~ (1969)
  19. M. D.Hooker, "PISTIS CRISTOU", NTS, 35, pp.322~336 (1989)
  20. L. T. Johnson, "Rom3:21-26 and the Faith of Jesus", CBQ, 44, pp.79~83 (1982)
  21. R. N. Longenecker, "Paul,Apostle of Liberty", pp.149~150 (1964), Harper & Row
  22. S. K. Williams, "Again Pistis Christou", CBQ, 49, pp.436~444 (1987)
  23. 이한수, "갈라디아서", pp.216~218 (2009), 솔로몬
  24. 최흥식, "바울서신에 나타난e;rga no,moupi,stij Cristou", 반제에 대한 새 관점, 2005, pp.12(4), 805~854[DOI]
  25. R. N. Longenecker, "갈라디아서: WBC 성경주석", pp.308~309 (2003), 솔로몬
  26. A. J. Hultgren, "The PISTIS CHRISTOU Formation in Paul", NovT, 22, pp.253~ (1980)
  27. J. D. G. Dunn, "Once More, PISTIS CRISTOU", SBL Seminar Papers, 30, pp.733~ (1991)
  28. R. B. Hays, "PISTIS and Pauline Christology", SBL Seminar Papers, 30, pp.726~ (1991)
  29. F. F. Bruce, "The Epistle to the Galatians: A Commentary on the Greek Text", pp.157~ (1982), Eerdmans
  30. J. D. G. Dunn, "The Epistle to the Galatians", pp.162~167 (1993), Hendrickson
  31. G. W. Hansen, "Galatians", pp.91~ (1994), InterVarsity Press
  32. H.C. C. Cavallin, "The Righteous Shall Live by Faith: A Decisive Argument for the Traditional Interpretation", ST, 32, pp.33~43 (1978)
  33. C. E. B. Cranfield, "‘The Works of the Law’in the Epistle to the Romans", JSNT, 43, pp.89~101 (1991)
  34. J. B. Lightfoot, "St. Paul's Epistle to the Galatians" (1865), Macmillan
  35. R. Bultmann, "Theology of the New Testament, vol. 1", pp.319~ (1955), Scribner’s Sons
  36. B. Witherington, "Grace in Galatia: A Commentary on St. Paul's Letter to the Galatians", pp.125~ (1998), Eerdmans
  37. J. Lambrecht, "Truth of the Gospel", pp.142~143 (1993), Benedictina
  38. D. B. Garlington, "Exposition of Galatians: A Reading from the New Perspective", pp.226~ (2007), Wipf and Stock Pub
  39. M. Silva, "Foundations of Contemporary Interpretation", pp.179~ (1996), Zondervan
  40. H. D. Betz, "Galatians: A Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Churches in Galatia", pp.182~ (1979), Fortress
  41. R. B. Matlock, "PISTIS in Galatians 3.26: Neglected Evidence for ‘Faith in Christ’", NTS, 49, pp.436~ (2003)
  42. J. D. G. Dunn, "Romans: WBC,vol. 38", pp.161~164 (1993), Word Books
  43. I.G. Wallis, "The Faith of Jesus Christ in Early Christians Traditions", pp.116~117 (1995), Cambridge University
  44. S. K. Williams, "The‘ Righteousness of God’in Romans", JBL, 99(2), pp.273~274 (1980)
  45. G. M. Taylor, "The Function of Pistis Christou in Galatians", JBL, 85, pp.75~ (1966)

관련 논문AI추천

'피스티스 크리스투'(P i s, t i j C r i s t o u /), 어떻게 이해할 것인가?최갑종한국복음주의신약학회 · 신약연구2011 · 제10권 제4호Again Πίστις Χριστοῦ -김형근의“‘Faith of Christ’”와‘Faith in Christ’”에 대한 답변-최갑종한국복음주의신약학회 · 신약연구2013 · 제12권 제2호아브라함과 그리스도의 믿음에 관한 수사학적 연구- 갈라디아서 3장을 중심으로 -조대훈한국복음주의신약학회 · 신약연구2014 · 제13권 제1호우월주의를 비판하는 바울의 의인(義認)론: 갈라디아서 2:15-21을 중심으로오사랑인문과학연구소 · 인문과학연구논총2022 · 제43권 제4호ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ, 어떻게 해석할 것인가?: 로마서 3:21-31에 나타나는 ΠΙΣΤΙΣ와 ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥΣΝΕ을 중심으로최갑종한국복음주의신학회 · 성경과 신학2009 · 제52권 칭의론과 그리스도의 믿음 - 갈라디아서 2:15-21을 중심으로 -김종길신학사상연구소 · 신학사상2009 · 제144호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Luke’s Understanding of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit: A Pentecostal PerspectiveRobert Meziespp. 772-791Reexamination of the Ironical Interpretation of the Parable of the Unjust Steward in Luke 16정창욱pp. 792-827요한복음에 등장하는 유다, 그는 누구인가?김문현pp. 828-853신약 성경 편지 서두 번역에 대한 제안김주한pp. 854-888로마서에서의 신명기 32장 사용 연구김경식pp. 929-959
원문 보기