바울이 생각한 이스라엘의 회복 - 로마서 11장의 관점에서
The Restoration of Israel in Paul's Thought - In terms of Rom. 11
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, my task is to find out how Paul as the apostle of/for/to the Gentiles thought the restoration of Israel. Actually my question is whether or not Paul really thought that Jews was out of his field. However, what we must remind that Paul was a Jew. So Paul opened his mind in Rom. 11. Many scholars are of opinion that all Israel would be saved completely in the future according to the Jewish eschatology. There are many patterns of Jewish universalism (the nations would be included into God's people) in the 1st century A.D. The tradition of eschatological pilgrimage, one of the patterns, shows the order of God's redemptive plan: all Israel will be saved and then the Gentiles will be saved(Isa. 2:2~4; Mic. 4:1~4). So the tradition reflects the fact that all Israel would be saved completely in the future. However, the problem is the order of God's redemptive plan. Rom. 11 presents the order of God’s redemptive plan as follows: Israel’s rejection of the gospel ⇒ Gentiles’ acceptance of the gospel ⇒ The salvation of all Israel. So some scholars present this order to as “an ingenious revision” of God’s original redemptive plan. So they insist that Paul has reversed the more typically Jewish expectation. To my opinion, the tradition of eschatological pilgrimage emphasizes not on the way how the nations would be included into God's people, but on the thought that the nations would be included into God's people. Furthermore, Rom. 11 does not presents the order of God's redemptive plan. That is why Paul has not reversed the order. Rom. 11 really present the way how God's redemptive plan will be progressed, and how the entire world(all Israel and the Gentiles) will be saved. Paul is still waiting for the consummation of the salvation of all Israel and the Gentiles. Paul suggests the way how Israel will be saved in Rom. 11, and says that the way is to preach the gospel to the Gentiles for the salvation of Israel. That is why we can regard Paul both as the apostle of Gentile and as that of Jews?
Abstract
In this article, my task is to find out how Paul as the apostle of/for/to the Gentiles thought the restoration of Israel. Actually my question is whether or not Paul really thought that Jews was out of his field. However, what we must remind that Paul was a Jew. So Paul opened his mind in Rom. 11. Many scholars are of opinion that all Israel would be saved completely in the future according to the Jewish eschatology. There are many patterns of Jewish universalism (the nations would be included into God's people) in the 1st century A.D. The tradition of eschatological pilgrimage, one of the patterns, shows the order of God's redemptive plan: all Israel will be saved and then the Gentiles will be saved(Isa. 2:2~4; Mic. 4:1~4). So the tradition reflects the fact that all Israel would be saved completely in the future. However, the problem is the order of God's redemptive plan. Rom. 11 presents the order of God’s redemptive plan as follows: Israel’s rejection of the gospel ⇒ Gentiles’ acceptance of the gospel ⇒ The salvation of all Israel. So some scholars present this order to as “an ingenious revision” of God’s original redemptive plan. So they insist that Paul has reversed the more typically Jewish expectation. To my opinion, the tradition of eschatological pilgrimage emphasizes not on the way how the nations would be included into God's people, but on the thought that the nations would be included into God's people. Furthermore, Rom. 11 does not presents the order of God's redemptive plan. That is why Paul has not reversed the order. Rom. 11 really present the way how God's redemptive plan will be progressed, and how the entire world(all Israel and the Gentiles) will be saved. Paul is still waiting for the consummation of the salvation of all Israel and the Gentiles. Paul suggests the way how Israel will be saved in Rom. 11, and says that the way is to preach the gospel to the Gentiles for the salvation of Israel. That is why we can regard Paul both as the apostle of Gentile and as that of Jews?
참고문헌 (53)
- "Romans 9-11 in the Context of the Early Church", Princeton Seminary Bulletin Supplement, pp.45~ (1990)
- Beker, "Paul the Apostle, 334; Marie-Joseph Lagrange, Saint Paul: Épître aux Romains", pp.284~ (1950), J.Gabalda
- Charles E.B.Cranfield, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans Vol. 2, The International Critical Commentary" (1975), T.& T.Clark
- Charles H.H. Scobie, "Jesus or Paul? The Origin of the Universal Mission of the Christian Church, in From Jesus to Paul: Studies in Honor of Francis Wright Beare", pp.51~52 (1984), Wilfrid Laurier University Press
- Charles Harold Dodd, "The Epistle of Paul to the Romans, The Moffatt New Testament Commentary", pp.148~ (1932), Hodder & Stoughton
- Charles Kingsley Barrett, "A Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans", pp.206~ (1991), A.& C.Black
- CharlesKingsleyBarrett, "ACommentary on the Epistle to the Romans", pp.207~ (1957), Harper & Row
- David E.Holwerda, "Jesus & Israel:One Covenant or Two?", pp.154~ (1995), Eerdmans
- Douglas J.Moo, "The Epistle to the Romans", pp.547~552 (1996), W.B.Eerdmans
- Thomas R. Schreiner, "Paul, Apostle of God's Glory in Christ: A Pauline Theology", pp.453~484 (2001), InterVarsity Press
- Ed Parish Sanders, "Paul", pp.118~ (1991), Oxford University Press
- Ed Parish Sanders, "Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People", pp.171~ (1983), Fortress Press
- Ernst Ka¨semann, "Commentary on Romans", pp.23~ (1980), Eerdmans
- John Ziesler, "Paul's letter to the Romans", pp.70~ (1989), SCM Press
- Ernst Ka¨semann, "Perspectives on Paul", pp.75~ (1971), Fortress
- Ferdinand Hahn, "Mission in the New Testament", pp.107~110 (1965), SCM Press
- Francis Watson, "The Two Roman Congregations: Romans 14:1-15:13, in The Romans Debate", pp.212~215 (1991), Hendrickson
- Francis Watson,Paul, "Judaism and the Gentiles, in Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 56", pp.28~32 (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Geerhardus Vos, "The Pauline Eschatology", pp.89~ (1979), Baker Book House
- Grant R. Osborne, "Romans,in The IVP New Testament Commentary Series 6", pp.25~ (2004), Intervarsity Press
- Hans Hu¨bner, "Gottes Ich und Israel:Zum Schriftgebrauch des Paulus in Ro¨mer 9-11", pp.112~113 (1984), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Hans Joachim Schoeps, "Paul:The Theology of the Apostle in the Light of Jewish Religious Thought", pp.219~ (1961), Lutterworth Press
- Herman Ridderbos, "Paul:An Outline of His Theology", pp.358~ (1975), W.B.Eerdmans
- James D.G.Dunn, "Romans 1-8", pp.40~ (1988), Word Books
- James D.G. Dunn, "Romans 9-16" (1988), Word Books
- James D.G.Dunn, "The theology of Paul the Apostle", pp.500~501 (1998), W.B.Eerdmans Pub.
- Jan Lodewyk de Villiers, "The Salvation of Israel according to Romans 9-11", Neotestamentica, 15, pp.209~ (1981)
- Johan Christian Beker, "Paul the Apostle:The Triumph of God in Life and Thought", pp.87~ (1980), Fortress Press
- John Arthur Thomas Robinson, "Wrestling with Romans", pp.109~ (1979), Westminster Press
- Joseph A.Fitzmyer, "Romans:A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary", pp.99~ (1993), Doubleday
- 1991, , 174~
- Krister Stendahl, "Paul among Jews and Gentiles, and Other Essays", pp.4~ (1976), Fortress Press
- Leonhard Goppelt, "Jesus, Paul and Judaism: An Introduction to New Testament Theology", pp.153~ (1964), Thomas Nelson & Sons
- Martin Goodman, "Mission and Conversion:Proselytizing in the Religious History of the Roman Empire", pp.165~166 (1994), Oxford University Press
- Mary Ann Getty, "Paul and the Salvation of Israel: A Perspective on Romans 9-11", The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 50, pp.462~ (1988)
- Morton Scott Enslin, "Reapproaching Paul", pp.71~76 (1972), Westminster Press
- Nicholas Thomas Wright, "The Climax of the Covenant:Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology", pp.247~ (1992), Fortress Press
- Nicholas Thomas Wright, "The Messiah and the People of God: A Study in Pauline Theology with Particular Reference to the Argument of the Epistle to the Romans", pp.220~ (1980), Oxford University
- Nils Alstrup Dahl, "Studies in Paul:Theology for the Early Christian Mission", pp.152~154 (1977), Augsburg Pub.House
- Otto Michel, "Der Brief an die Ro¨mer", pp.281~ (1978), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Richard B.Hays, "Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul", pp.63~ (1989), Yale University Press
- Robin Scroggs, "Paul as Rhetorician: Two Homilies in Romans 1-11, in Jews, Greeks and Christians: Religious Cultures in Late Antiquity: Essays in Honor of William David Davies", pp.271~298 (1976), Brill
- Roger D. Aus, "Paul’s Travel plans to Spain and the ‘Full Number of the Gentiles’ of Rom 11:25", NovT, 21, pp.242~ (1979)
- Steve Mason, "‘For I Am Not Ashamed of the Gospel’(Rom. 1:16): The Gospel and the First Readers of Romans, in Gospel in Paul: Studies on Corinthians, Galatians and Romans for Richard N. Longenecker", pp.255~ (1994), Sheffield Academic Press
- Terence L. Donaldson, "Paul and the Gentiles: Remapping the Apostle's Convictional World", pp.159~ (1997), Fortress Press
- Thomas H.Tobin, "Paul's Rhetoric in Its Contexts:The Argument of Romans", pp.299~ (2004), Hendrickson Publishers
- Thomas R.Schreiner, "Romans, in Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament 6", pp.62~ (1998), Baker Books
- Ulrich Luz, "Das Geschichtsversta¨ndnis des Paulus", pp.239~ (1968), Chr.Kaiser
- William David Davies, "Jewish and Pauline Studies", pp.146~ (1984), Fortress Press
- William Manson, "The Epistle of the Hebrews:An Historical and Theological Reconsideration", pp.179~184 (1951), Hodder & Stoughton
- William Sanday, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans", pp.225~ (1902), T.& T.Clark
- 김태훈, "유대주의 보편주의 관점에서 본 종말론적 순례의 전통", 신약논단, 17(3), pp.755~788 (2010), 한국신약학회
- 김태훈, "유대주의 보편주의 입장에서 본 이방 개종주의 전통", 신약논단, 18(2), pp.631~665 (2011), 한국신약학회