본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 회색지대 전략의 향후 전망과 정책적 함의: 미 · 중간 국가이익의 차이를 중심으로

Future Prospects and Policy Implications of China’s Gray Zone Strategy: Focusing on the Difference in National Interests between the US and China

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

중국의 부상은 세계화와 미국의 자유주의적 국제주의 시각에서 이루어진 관여정책을 기반으로 이루어졌다. 하지만 최근 중국이 지역 패권과 세계적으로 영향권을 확대하기 위해서 회색지대 전략과 일대일로를 추구하면서, 중국의 급격한 경제성장과 이를 기반으로 하는 군비강화는 최근 전세계적인 화두가 되고 있다. 따라서 중국의 이런 전략 중 특히 회색지대 전략은 향후에도 성공적일 것인지 그렇지 못하다면 왜 그런 지를 연구하였다. 우선 국가이익의 우선순위와 그것을 추구하는 방식과 수단을 포함하는 대전략 개념을 이용하고자 한다. 이를 통해 미국과 중국의 대전략간 관계가 양립 불가능함을 알 수 있다. 현재 미국은 이전과 같이 일방적인 군사 행동이나, 견제 행동에는 한계가 있다. 하지만 냉전이래 구축된 동맹 네트워크 그리고 최근 중국의 강압적 행동과 코로나에 대한 미숙한 대처로 인한 세계적인 부정적인 평가로 미국에 우호적인 분위기가 있다. 그런데 중국의 회색지대 전략이 성공하기 위해서는 미국에 대한 상대적 권력을 얻고, 전쟁이 발발해서는 안 되는 2가지 조건을 충족해야 한다. 그러나 미국은 견제를 추구할 것이기 때문에, 아무리 적은 ‘상대적 권력’일지라도 양보하지 않으려고 할 것이다. 따라서 회색지대 전략 성공을 위한 2가지 조건 모두를 충족하기는 힘들 것이다.

Abstract

Although China's rise was based on globalization and the US's policy of engagement from the liberal internationalist perspective. However, as China recently pursued a gray zone strategy and Belt and Road Initiative to expand regional hegemony and global influence, China's rapid economic growth and military reinforcement based on this have recently become a global topic. Therefore, I studied whether China's strategy, especially the gray zone strategy, would be successful in the future, if not, why. First, the national interest was prioritized and the concept of a grand strategy including methods and means for pursuing them was used. This shows that the relationship between the US and China's grand strategy is incompatible. And among the countries that challenged the US in history, it was found that the US pursued a policy of balancing against countries that were incompatible with US national interests. Even war could be waged. However, for China's gray zone strategy to be successful, two conditions must be met: it must gain relative power over the United States and that war must not break out. However, since the United States will abandon its policy of engagement and seek balancing, it will not concede no matter how little “relative power” it may have. Therefore, it will be difficult to satisfy both conditions for the success of the gray zone strategy. Therefore, China's gray zone strategy is highly likely to fail.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 김예슬, "남중국해 해양분쟁과 회색지대전략(Gray zone strategy): 중국해상민병대(Maritime Militia) 사례연구", pp.2020
  2. 박송이, "미국 인플레이션 감축법에 위협받는 한국", 주간경향, 제1494집, ~ (2022)
  3. 박창희, "군사전략론" (2013), 플래닛미디어
  4. 정구연, "미중 세력전이와 미국 해양전략의 변화: 회색지대갈등을 중심으로", 국가전략, 24(3), pp.87~112 (2018), 세종연구소[DOI]
  5. Art, Robert J., "A Grand Strategy for America" (2003), Cornell University Press
  6. Blanchette, Jude, "Xi’s Gamble: The Race to Consolidate Power and Stave OffDisaster", Foreign Affairs, 100(4), pp.10~19 (2021)
  7. Brands, Hal, "Paradoxes of the Gray Zone", Foreign Policy Research Institute, ~ (2016)
  8. Chan, Steve, "Thucydides's Trap?: Historical Interpretation, Logic of Inquiry, and the Future of Sino-American Relations" (2020), University of Michigan Press
  9. Colby, Elbridge A., "The Age of Great-Power Competition: How the Trump Administration Refashioned American Strategy", Foreign Affairs, 99(1), pp.118~130 (2020)
  10. Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region, "Department of Defense", U.S. Department of Defense, ~ (2019)
  11. Echevarria, Antulio J., "Operating in the Gray Zone: An Alternative Paradigm for US Military Strategy" (2016), Army War College Press
  12. Ellings, Richard J., "Power and Purpose" (2001), The National Bureau of Asian Research
  13. Freier, Nathan, "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" (2016), U.S. Army War College Press
  14. Green, Michael J., "Countering Coercion in Maritime Asia: The Theory and Practice of Gray Zone Deterrence" (2017), Center for Strategic & International Studies
  15. The US-Japan Alliance and Deterring Gray Zone Coercion in the Maritime, Cyber, and Space Domains, "Harold, Scott W.", RAND Corporation, ~ (2017)
  16. Kapusta, Philip, "The Gray Zone, MacDill Air Force Base", United States Special Operations Command, ~ (2015)
  17. Why Airsea Battle?, "Krepinevich, Andrew F.", Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, ~ (2010)
  18. Laura Silver, "Unfavorable Views of China Reach Historic Highs in Many Countries: Majorities say China has handled COVID-19 outbreak poorly" (2020), Pew Research Center
  19. Matisek, Jahara W., "Shades of Gray Deterrence: Issues of Fighting in the Gray Zone", Journal of Strategic Security, 10(3), pp.1~26 (2017)
  20. Mazarr, Michael J., "Mastering the Gray Zone: Understanding A Changing Era of Conflict" (2015), US Army War College Strategic Studies Institute
  21. McFaul, Michael, "Cold War Lessons and Fallacies for US-China Relations Today", The Washington Quarterly, 43(4), pp.7~39 (2020)
  22. Mearsheimer, John J., "The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics", Foreign Affairs, 100(6), pp.48~58 (2021)
  23. Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" (2001), W.W. Norton & Company
  24. Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" (2014), W.W. Norton & Company
  25. Mitter, Rana, "The World China Wants: How Power Will—and Won’t—Reshape Chinese Ambitions", Foreign Affairs, 100(1), pp.161~174 (2021)
  26. Morris, Lyle J., "Gaining Competitive Advantage in the Gray Zone: Response Options for Coercive Aggression Below the Threshold of Major War" (2019), RAND Corporation
  27. Pottinger, Matt, "Beijing’s American Hustle: How Chinese Grand Strategy Exploits U.S. Power", Foreign Affairs, 100(5), pp.102~114 (2021)
  28. Rosecrance, Richard, "The Next Great War?: The Roots of World War I and The Risk of U.S.-China Conflict" (2015), The MIT Press
  29. Schadlow, Nadia, "The End of American Illusion: Trump and the World as it is", Foreign Affairs, 99(5), pp.35~45 (2020)
  30. Scobell, Andrew, "China's Grand Strategy: Trends, Trajectories, and Long-Term Competition" (2020), RAND Corporation
  31. Takahashi, Sugio, "Development of Gray-Zone Deterrence: Concept Building and Lessons from Japan’s Experience", The Pacific Review, 31(6), pp.787~810 (2018)
  32. U.S. Department of Defense, "Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge", Department of Defense, ~ (2018)
  33. Van Tol, Jan, "AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept" (2010), Center for Budgetary and Strategic Assessments
  34. White House, "The National Security Strategy of the United States of America", White House, ~ (2017)
  35. Wirtz, James J., "Life in the Gray Zone: Observations for Contemporary Strategists", Defense & Security Analysis, 33(2), pp.106~114 (2017)
  36. "미·중 해양패권 경쟁과 ‘회색지대전략’" (2018)[URL]
  37. "The Chip 4 Alliance Might Work on Paper, But Problems Will Persist" (2022)[URL]
  38. "U.S.-Chinese Rivalry Is a Battle Over Values" (2021)[URL]
  39. "How to Win America’s Next War" (2019)[URL]
  40. "How to Prevent a War in Asia: The Erosion of American Deterrence Raises the Risk of Chinese Miscalculation" (2020)[URL]
  41. "Three Challenges Biden Must Confront" (2020)[URL]
  42. "Balancing Great Power Politics in 2021 and Beyond" (2020)[URL]
  43. "What Is the Purpose of American Foreign Policy?" (2020)[URL]
  44. "What Will Joe Biden's China Strategy Look Like?" (2020)[URL]
  45. "Struggle in the Gray Zone and World Order" (2015)[URL]
  46. "China’s Techno-Authoritarianism Has Gone Global: Washington Needs to Offer an Alternative" (2021)[URL]
  47. "Interpreting China’s ‘Wolf-Warrior Diplomacy’" (2020)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)