아동복지시설 위탁처분(6호)의 문제점과 개선방안
The Problems and Improvement Measures of the Protective Disposition No.6
0
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to Juvenile Act article 32(1)6, the protective disposition No.6refers child whose delinquency is not deepened but guardian or family is not appropriate to fully protect the child, to a Child Welfare Institution regulated by Chile Welfare Act or other protective facilities. Although the protective disposition No. 6 is one of the institutional treatments, it is different from the other dispositions sending the juveniles to a reformatory governed by nation in that No. 6 is based on the private institution. Even though the need to revitalize No.6 is getting bigger resulting from increase of child crime, the rate of disposition of No. 6 is under 3%recently because of lacking facilities. The reason why the No. 6 has not been widely used is as follows. First, the facilities for the No. 6 are divided to two groups: child welfare institutions by Child Welfare Act and juvenile protective facilities by court's order. The division has made constant support of budget and personnel for the facilities impossible. Second, the facilities could not carry out its own purpose and the real function of the facilities has been changed to the accomodations for the poor youth because the recipient of the No.6 is child and there are so many poor children. Third, the institutions for the No.6 assigned to each community are significantly lacking and the personnels are not professional enough. Fourth, the educational programs are not appropriate for the individual recipients since almost all facilities accommodate both juvenile delinquent and normal juvenile. Therefore, the execution of the disposition could be different according to which facilities the recipients referred to. To solve these problems, the child welfare facilities by Child Welfare Act should be excluded. Also, specialized organizations for juvenile delinquent such as Department of Justice should appoint certain private facilities so that the facilities should be intensively managed and supervised. Moreover, there should be provisions for systemic support of juvenile delinquent on the Act on the Treatment of Protected Juvenile,etc. Also, the capacity of the facilities should be limited to 20 people and programs should be specialized according to age, sex, the type of delinquency, etc. Finally, whole juvenile system needs to be changed to shorten the required time for the process of the disposition considering 3∼6 months are usually required for the whole process.
Abstract
According to Juvenile Act article 32(1)6, the protective disposition No.6refers child whose delinquency is not deepened but guardian or family is not appropriate to fully protect the child, to a Child Welfare Institution regulated by Chile Welfare Act or other protective facilities. Although the protective disposition No. 6 is one of the institutional treatments, it is different from the other dispositions sending the juveniles to a reformatory governed by nation in that No. 6 is based on the private institution. Even though the need to revitalize No.6 is getting bigger resulting from increase of child crime, the rate of disposition of No. 6 is under 3%recently because of lacking facilities. The reason why the No. 6 has not been widely used is as follows. First, the facilities for the No. 6 are divided to two groups: child welfare institutions by Child Welfare Act and juvenile protective facilities by court's order. The division has made constant support of budget and personnel for the facilities impossible. Second, the facilities could not carry out its own purpose and the real function of the facilities has been changed to the accomodations for the poor youth because the recipient of the No.6 is child and there are so many poor children. Third, the institutions for the No.6 assigned to each community are significantly lacking and the personnels are not professional enough. Fourth, the educational programs are not appropriate for the individual recipients since almost all facilities accommodate both juvenile delinquent and normal juvenile. Therefore, the execution of the disposition could be different according to which facilities the recipients referred to. To solve these problems, the child welfare facilities by Child Welfare Act should be excluded. Also, specialized organizations for juvenile delinquent such as Department of Justice should appoint certain private facilities so that the facilities should be intensively managed and supervised. Moreover, there should be provisions for systemic support of juvenile delinquent on the Act on the Treatment of Protected Juvenile,etc. Also, the capacity of the facilities should be limited to 20 people and programs should be specialized according to age, sex, the type of delinquency, etc. Finally, whole juvenile system needs to be changed to shorten the required time for the process of the disposition considering 3∼6 months are usually required for the whole process.
참고문헌 (16)
- 소년호보처분 감호위탁의 문제점과 입법적 개선방안, "국회입법조사처", ~, pp.현장조사보고서 제7호 (2010)
- 김병주, "소년보호시설위탁(4호처분)의 활성화 방안", 형사법과 세법 (1998)
- 소년수탁시설의 처우실태에 관한 연구, "김준호", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1994)
- 4호처분의 운영실태 및 개선방안, "김지선", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 김지선, "소년범에 대한 보호처분의 내실화, 다양화 방안" (2005), 법무부 소년법개정특별위원회
- 박태동, "소년법상 4호처분에 관한 고찰-서울가정법원의 실무를 중심으로-", 법조, (509) (1999)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요: 소년" (2000), 비송
- 소년보호사건의 개선을 위한 회의결과 보고서, "법원행정처", ~ (1997)
- 안병경, "소년범에 대한 시설내처우와 사회내처우의 연계방안", 보호, 통권 : 18 (2006), 법무부
- 장영민, "현행 소년법의 문제점과 개선방안", 법학논집, 10(1), pp.73~102 (2005), 법학연구소
- 정해룡, "21세기 소년보호정책의 새로운 패러다임과 발전전략", 보호, 통권 : 14 (2002), 법무부
- 정희철, "소년형법과 교육사상", 박사, pp.2004
- 최종식, "일본 소년법개정의 최근 동향", 강원법학, 25, pp.125~147 (2007), 비교법학연구소
- 최태식, "소년법상 보호처분 규정의 문제점 및 개선방안", 교정복지연구, (3) (2006)
- 關哲夫, "少年法の解說" (2008), 一橋出版
- 田宮裕, "注釋少年法" (2009), 有斐閣
