가정법원 소년조사관의 업무와 역할에 관한 연구
A Study on Duties and Roles of Family Court Probation Officers in Juvenile Protection Justice
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a nationwide sample of 26 judges and 25 family court probation officers(FCPO) to find out their perception on the duties and roles of FCPO in juvenile protection justice. Study results revealed that almost all judges and FCPOs thought that the duties and roles that FCPOs play in juvenile protection justice were helpful in resolving the juvenile cases. Of the duties and roles that FCPOs play, judges especially appreciated the counseling and educational services provided to the juvenile offenders, reports explaining the reasons behind delinquent behaviors and activities linking services from outside agencies to juvenile offenders and their families FCPOs in juvenile protection justice allot most of their working time to conducting social studies as well as finding and linking outside resources to juvenile offenders and their families. They mainly use the method of investigative interviewing with juvenile offenders and their families but also do home visiting and psychological testing. Both judges and FCPOs thought that of all duties and roles, the activities of finding and linking outside resources to juvenile offenders and their families as well as counseling and educational services for juvenile offenders and their families should be increased and reinforced. Judges, however, expressed a statistically higher need than FCPOs for the reinforcement of investigative activities and supervision of agencies that execute juvenile protective actions. Implications for ways to further improve and reinforce the duties and roles of FCPOs in juvenile protection justice were discussed.
Abstract
A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a nationwide sample of 26 judges and 25 family court probation officers(FCPO) to find out their perception on the duties and roles of FCPO in juvenile protection justice. Study results revealed that almost all judges and FCPOs thought that the duties and roles that FCPOs play in juvenile protection justice were helpful in resolving the juvenile cases. Of the duties and roles that FCPOs play, judges especially appreciated the counseling and educational services provided to the juvenile offenders, reports explaining the reasons behind delinquent behaviors and activities linking services from outside agencies to juvenile offenders and their families FCPOs in juvenile protection justice allot most of their working time to conducting social studies as well as finding and linking outside resources to juvenile offenders and their families. They mainly use the method of investigative interviewing with juvenile offenders and their families but also do home visiting and psychological testing. Both judges and FCPOs thought that of all duties and roles, the activities of finding and linking outside resources to juvenile offenders and their families as well as counseling and educational services for juvenile offenders and their families should be increased and reinforced. Judges, however, expressed a statistically higher need than FCPOs for the reinforcement of investigative activities and supervision of agencies that execute juvenile protective actions. Implications for ways to further improve and reinforce the duties and roles of FCPOs in juvenile protection justice were discussed.
참고문헌 (46)
- 청소년 참여법정의 현황 분석 및 발전방안에관한 연구, "곽한영", ~ (2011)
- 대법원, "사법발전계획 추진 현황과 향후 과제" (2003), 대법원
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요: 소년․비송, 제2판" (2000), 법원행정처
- 사법사편찬위원회, "역사속의 사법부" (2009), 사법발전재단
- 김상규, "문제해결법원-미국 뉴욕의 예를 중심으로", 비교사법연구회발표회자료집, pp.201~202
- 박광배, "치료사법의 개념과 현황", 사법, (창간), pp.135~162, 사법연구지원재단
- 박우동, "가정법원 20년의 회고와 전망", 재판자료, 18, pp.26~28
- 송현종, "소년조사업무의 전문화를 위한 모색", 실무연구, 11, pp.405~472, 서울가정법원
- 송현종, "개정된 소년법의 이해와 현장 적용", 2008년 서울특별시청소년동반자 Workshop 자료집, pp.33~39, 서울특별시 청소년상담지원센터
- 양정자, "가정법원의 현황과 발전방안-전국에 가정법원 설치를 촉구하며", 가족법연구, (14), pp.496~ (2000)
- 오영근, "개정 소년법의 과제와 전망", 2008년 한국형사정책연구원춘계 형사정책연구세미나 자료집, pp.9~11 (2008), 형사정책연구원
- 이재화, "가정법원 30년의 발자취", 재판자료, 62, pp.61~ (1993)
- 전보성, "가정법원 운영 현황보고", 가정법원 심포지엄-가정법원의확대와 새로운 시도-(자료), pp.22~23 (2012), 대법원
- 정승원, "미래를 여는 가정법원, 그 새로운 시도", 가정법원 심포지엄-가정법원의 확대와 새로운 시도-집료집, pp.118~149 (2012), 대법원
- 차경환, "소년보호재판의 개선방안", 사법, 1(10), pp.87~127 (2009), 사법발전재단
- 최병각, "소년법개정과 소년사법의 건전한 육성", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.1081~1104 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 최선경, "소년사건의 새로운 절차에서 조사관의 역할", 서울가정법원 실무연구회 자료집, 1~23 (2011)
- 한숙희, "서울가정법원 가사조사관의 운영개선방안", 가사재판연구Ⅰ, pp.268~271 (2007), 서울가정법원
- 한숙희, "촉법소년 연령인하에 따른 가정법원의 역할과 과제", 2008년 한국형사정책연구원, 춘계 형사정책연구세미나 자료집, pp.89~114 (2008), 형사정책연구원
- 소년조사제도의 개선방안에 대한 연구, "홍영오", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2011)
- 소년보호재판개선연구 결과보고(미간행), "사법정책실", 법원행정처, ~ (2009)
- 조사관제도 종합검토 보고서(미간행), "서울가정법원", ~ (2003)
- 조사관 제도 개선 연구 보고서(미간행), "서울가정법원", 국외문헌, ~ (2009)
- 伊藤富士江, "司法福祉入門" (2010), 上智大学出版
- 小林寿一, "少年非行と行動科学" (2008), 北大路書房
- 最高裁判所, "裁判所データブック" (2007), 最高裁判所
- 裁判所職員総合研修所, "少年法入門, 六訂版", 研修教材, (8) (2007), 裁判所職員総合研修所
- 裁判所職員総合研修所, "家庭事件調査実務入門(改訂版)", 研修教材第, (27) (2007), 裁判所職員総合研修所
- 最高裁判所事務総局, "家庭裁判所調査官執務必携", 家裁裁判資料, (185) (2008), 最高裁判所
- 村尾泰弘, "よくわかる司法福祉" (2004), ミネルヴァ書房
- 廣井亮一, "司法臨床の方法" (2007), 金剛出版
- 沢登俊雄, "少年法入門, 第5版" (2011), 有斐閣ブックス
- 河手敏裕, "少年法改正の意味と今後の実務への期待", 家庭裁判月報, 61(1), pp.104~120 (2009)
- 菊地和典, "家庭裁判所調査官制度の回顧と展望", 家庭裁判月報, 41(1) (1989)
- 鶴岡健一, "家庭裁判所の福祉的機能と家庭裁判所調査官の役割", 숭실대학교 사회복지대학원․사회복지연구소 주최 2012년 상반기 외부초청 강연회자료집, 3~4 (2012)
- 韓国ソウル家庭法院調査官の事件へに関与ー少年法に改正と担い手の悩み, "宋賢鐘", 少年法研究会報告資料, ~ (2009)
- Center for Families, "A Guide for California Courts on Unifying and Coordinating Family and Juvenile Law Matters", Judicial Council of California Administrative Office of the Courts, ~ (2004)
- Ohio Family Court Feasibility Study, "National Center for Juvenile Justice", Supreme Court of Ohio, ~ (1997)
- Howell, J. C., "Guide for Implementing the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, Chronic Juvenile Offenders" (1995), OJJP
- Schepard, I. A, "Children, Courts, and Custody" (2004), CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
- Rudes, D. S., "Juvenile Probation Officers: How the Perception of Roles Affects Training Experiences for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation", Federal Probation, 75(3), pp.3~5
- Page, R. W., "Family Courts: An Effective Judicial Approach to the Resolution of Family Disputes", Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 44, pp.3~5 (1993)
- Peter, C. M, "Social Work and Juvenile Probation: Historical Tension and Contemporary Convergences", Social Work, 56(4), pp.356~ (2011), National Association Social Workers
- Sluder, R. D., "Probation officer's role perceptions and attitudes toward firearms", Federal Probation, 55(3), pp.3~11
- Sulder, R. D., "An empirical examination of the ideologies of juvenile and adult probation officers", Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 20(1), pp.115~137
- "Problem-Solving Courts: A Brief Primer" (2001)[URL]