소년분류심사원의 운영실태 및 인식분석을 통한 역할강화방안
Strengthen the role through Operation Assessment and Perception of the Juvenile Classification Review Center
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Juvenile Classification Review Center play the role that help to accurately diagnose the causes of juvenile delinquency in its early stages and provides the right treatment appropriate for the characteristics of individual juveniles. However, currently there is only 1 the Juvenile Classification Review Center and 6 proxy juvenile detention institutions in South Korea. Under the circumstance, such institutions are severely overcrowded with juvenile delinquents. As the number of juveniles in such institutions increases continuously with the establishment of competent courts, overcrowding gets more severe, worsening negative aspects such as human rights infringement and learning crimes. Under the current situation, there is a need to analyze the status of the current operation of the Juvenile Classification Review Center, its role and function, and examine the measures that the Juvenile Classification Review Center needs to take to accurately diagnose juvenile delinquents and to decide on their treatment. In order to strengthen the role of the Juvenile Classification Review Center it is necessary not only to establish more the Juvenile Classification Review Center by the unit of metropolitan city but also to make small the current facilities of the classification review board and to abolish the classification review function of the proxy juvenile detention institutions. Considering negative side effects, classification review of young juveniles through detention should be limited as much as possible. Behavior observation and environment inspection should be the priority for the purpose of specializing classification review. And there is a need to remove transport of delinquents and night duty from the duty list of classification review officers to improve their work environment. They should be given ample office hours to diagnose misconducts and prepare classification review reports. There is also a need to develop specialized education programs to prevent delinquency especially those detained at the institutions in their beginning stage of delinquency. Regarding legislative improvements, there is a need for special budgeting and treatment of those subject to classification review through a separate legislation. In addition, for a specialized misconduct diagnose, the minimum number of juvenile delinquents should be detained. To minimize human rights violations, the criteria to extend detention period should be stipulated in related laws, and legal grounds should be prepared to more strictly apply the causes for detention. Procedural rules to raise objections to classification review processes should be laid down to let delinquents themselves and their parents to make appeals. There should be separate provisions in related laws for treatment of those juveniles in the proxy institutions, aside from treatment for juveniles in average juvenile detention centers.
Abstract
The Juvenile Classification Review Center play the role that help to accurately diagnose the causes of juvenile delinquency in its early stages and provides the right treatment appropriate for the characteristics of individual juveniles. However, currently there is only 1 the Juvenile Classification Review Center and 6 proxy juvenile detention institutions in South Korea. Under the circumstance, such institutions are severely overcrowded with juvenile delinquents. As the number of juveniles in such institutions increases continuously with the establishment of competent courts, overcrowding gets more severe, worsening negative aspects such as human rights infringement and learning crimes. Under the current situation, there is a need to analyze the status of the current operation of the Juvenile Classification Review Center, its role and function, and examine the measures that the Juvenile Classification Review Center needs to take to accurately diagnose juvenile delinquents and to decide on their treatment. In order to strengthen the role of the Juvenile Classification Review Center it is necessary not only to establish more the Juvenile Classification Review Center by the unit of metropolitan city but also to make small the current facilities of the classification review board and to abolish the classification review function of the proxy juvenile detention institutions. Considering negative side effects, classification review of young juveniles through detention should be limited as much as possible. Behavior observation and environment inspection should be the priority for the purpose of specializing classification review. And there is a need to remove transport of delinquents and night duty from the duty list of classification review officers to improve their work environment. They should be given ample office hours to diagnose misconducts and prepare classification review reports. There is also a need to develop specialized education programs to prevent delinquency especially those detained at the institutions in their beginning stage of delinquency. Regarding legislative improvements, there is a need for special budgeting and treatment of those subject to classification review through a separate legislation. In addition, for a specialized misconduct diagnose, the minimum number of juvenile delinquents should be detained. To minimize human rights violations, the criteria to extend detention period should be stipulated in related laws, and legal grounds should be prepared to more strictly apply the causes for detention. Procedural rules to raise objections to classification review processes should be laid down to let delinquents themselves and their parents to make appeals. There should be separate provisions in related laws for treatment of those juveniles in the proxy institutions, aside from treatment for juveniles in average juvenile detention centers.
참고문헌 (13)
- 김철호, "소년분류심사원의 기능과 역할 강화", 소년범의 감소를 위한 소년분류심사원의 역할 정책토론회, ~ (2015)
- 2015 범죄분석, "대검찰청", ~ (2015)
- 법무부 범죄예방정책국, "조직 및 인력운영의 효율성 제고를 위한 전국 소년보호기관 업무량 및 직무분석", ~ (2014)
- 법무연수원, "2015 범죄백서" (2016)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요: 소년ㆍ비송" (2000)
- 소년사건처리절차의 개선방안에 관한 연구, "오영근", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1994)
- 원혜욱, "소년범죄에 대한 시설내 처우의 문제점Ⅰ- 미결구금제도(소년분류심사원제도)의 문제점을 중심으로-", 교정연구, 15, pp.7~29 (2002), 한국교정학회
- 인권친화적 분류심사제도 및 소년비행예방센터의 개선방안, "원혜욱", 법무부 인권국, ~ (2008)
- 소년분류심사원의 역할강화방안, "이승현", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2015)
- 이춘화, "한국의 소년분류심사제도에 관한 연구 -분류심사기준을 중심으로-", 소년보호연구, 13, pp.97~129 (2009), 한국소년정책학회
- 정수용, "소년보호기관의 교육과정 개선에 관한 연구 : 법무부 대구소년분류심사원의 대안교육을 중심으로", 석사, 복지행정, pp.2005
- 정해룡, "소년분류심사제도 운영실태 및 발전방향", 소년보호연구, (5) (2003)
- 최석윤, "한국의 소년분류심사제도에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.719~742 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
