본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개정 소년법과 소년사법의 효율성

The juvenile law reform and effectivity of juvenile justice

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This study focuses upon the some problems in the 4th juvenile law amendment. The categories of this criticism are the juvenile ciurt dispositions, the object of protection cases and the theory of the criminal law(esp. juvenile law). Since the 3rd juvenile law amendment in 1988, many theoretical and practical problems of the juvenile law have been exposed. So some reformative approaches have been suggested in order to overcome those problems in the juvenile justice processing. That is to say: First, the term of juveniles as the object of the juvenile law should be defined more accurately by the age when he/she commits crime. Second, the worrying juveniles should be excluded from the object of protection cases. Third, the pre-trial diversion programs should be grounded in the juvenile law. Fourth, juveniles should have a right to appeal to the order of transfer to the prosecutor by the juvenile court and the prosecutor ought to follow the decisions of the juvenile court. Fifth, the causes of juvenile detention should be accurately regulated and diverse facilities such as foster home, juvenile welfare facility, juvenile discipline facility could be available as juvenile detention center. Sixth, a comprehensive juvenile investigation agency should be established and more resources ought to be invested in juvenile investigation. Seventh, provisions to protect the constitutional right and due process should be inserted in the juvenile law. The public defender and the criminal compensation for the petitioned juvenile should be introduced in the juvenile law. To solve these problems, recently in the year 2007, the juvenile law has been reformed. Through this amendment, the some theoretical and practical problems in the juvenile law disposition have the chance to been get rid of. But this revised juvenile law is not yet enough to overcome the other problems. For example, the jurisdiction problems in juvenile cases, the object of protection cases, short term(1 month) transferring to training school etc. More and continuous efforts to solve these problems are strongly needed.

Abstract

This study focuses upon the some problems in the 4th juvenile law amendment. The categories of this criticism are the juvenile ciurt dispositions, the object of protection cases and the theory of the criminal law(esp. juvenile law). Since the 3rd juvenile law amendment in 1988, many theoretical and practical problems of the juvenile law have been exposed. So some reformative approaches have been suggested in order to overcome those problems in the juvenile justice processing. That is to say: First, the term of juveniles as the object of the juvenile law should be defined more accurately by the age when he/she commits crime. Second, the worrying juveniles should be excluded from the object of protection cases. Third, the pre-trial diversion programs should be grounded in the juvenile law. Fourth, juveniles should have a right to appeal to the order of transfer to the prosecutor by the juvenile court and the prosecutor ought to follow the decisions of the juvenile court. Fifth, the causes of juvenile detention should be accurately regulated and diverse facilities such as foster home, juvenile welfare facility, juvenile discipline facility could be available as juvenile detention center. Sixth, a comprehensive juvenile investigation agency should be established and more resources ought to be invested in juvenile investigation. Seventh, provisions to protect the constitutional right and due process should be inserted in the juvenile law. The public defender and the criminal compensation for the petitioned juvenile should be introduced in the juvenile law. To solve these problems, recently in the year 2007, the juvenile law has been reformed. Through this amendment, the some theoretical and practical problems in the juvenile law disposition have the chance to been get rid of. But this revised juvenile law is not yet enough to overcome the other problems. For example, the jurisdiction problems in juvenile cases, the object of protection cases, short term(1 month) transferring to training school etc. More and continuous efforts to solve these problems are strongly needed.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 강영호, "소년심판절차의 적법절차의 보장", 청소년범죄연구, 5 (1987), 법무부
  2. 권태호, "소년법에 대한 형벌의 효율성검토", 청소년범죄연구, 4 (1986), 법무부
  3. 김기두, "소년법상의 제반 문제점과 개정방향", 청소년범죄연구, 3 (1985), 법무부
  4. 김동림, "소년법의 문제점과 입법에 관한 논의", 형사정책, 12(1) (2000)
  5. 김영란, "개정 소년법에 대한 일고", 법무부, 7 (1989)
  6. 김용우, "형사정책" (1998), 박영사
  7. 나채규, "소년법상 보호처분의 활성화방안", 청소년범죄연구, 8 (1990), 법무부
  8. 박달현, "현행 소년법상 보호처분의 문제점과 개선방안", 교정연구, (36) (2007)
  9. 박재윤, "소년법개정의 기본방향", 청소년범죄연구, 5 (1987), 법무부
  10. 배종대, "형법의 목적과 소년형벌의 효율성검토", 청소년범죄연구, 4 (1986), 법무부
  11. 백춘기, "소년보호사건에 있어서의 비행사실, 가정법원사건의 제문제", 재판자료, 62 (1993), 법원행정처
  12. 법원행정처, "법원실무제요" (2000)
  13. 서울가정법원, "법원선의주의와 검찰선의주의, 가사소년제도개혁위원회 공청회자료집", pp.2005, 가사소년제도개혁위원회
  14. 소순무, "각국의 소년법제와 우리 제도의 개선방안, 가정법원사건의 제문제", 재판자료, 18 (1983), 법원행정처
  15. 송광섭, "소년원교육의 현황과 개선방안", 형사정책, (11) (1999)
  16. 에이커스, "범죄학이론" (2005), 나남출판
  17. 오선주, "소년법과 소년보호, 청주대학교 법학논집" (1989), 청주대학교
  18. 오선주, "소년심판과 소년보호, 청주대학교 법학논집" (1993), 청주대학교
  19. 오행남, "소년범에 대한 보호처분의 연구, 가정법원사건의 제문제", 재판자료, 18 (1983), 법원행정처
  20. 원혜욱, "적정한 소년사건처리절차의 보장", (11) (1999)
  21. 유원석, "소년보호절차에 있어서 형사소송법의 준용, 가정법원사건의 제문제", 법원행정처, 62 (1993), 법원행정처
  22. 윤용규, "우리나라 소년사법의 운용실태와 개선방안에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, (겨울) (2000)
  23. 이승현, "검사선의주의에 관한 검토", 소년보호연구, (10) (2007)
  24. 이윤호, "최근 소년사법의 경향에 따른 소년범에 대한 효과적인 대응방안의모색", 한국공안행정학회보, (22) (2006)
  25. 이은한, "소년사건 처리절차 개선을 위한 제언", 소년법연구, (2) (2007)
  26. 임상규, "소년범죄의 합리적 처리방안", 형사법연구, (17) (2002)
  27. 정희철, "少年法改正의 理論과 現實: 改正試案의 몇 가지 問題點", 중앙법학, 9(1), pp.223~247 (2007), 중앙법학회
  28. 조대현, "소년원 송치처분에 대한 검토", 청소년범죄연구, 4 (1986), 법무부
  29. 최병각, "소년법개정과 소년사법의 건전한 육성", 형사정책연구, 18(3) (2007)
  30. 최병각, "소년사법에서의 소년보호", 형사법연구, 19(3) (2007)
  31. 최병문, "미국의 소년사법제도", 형사정책, (5) (1990)
  32. 최종식, "소년법개정논의에 관한 비판적 검토", 형사정책, 19(1) (2007)
  33. 최호진, "개정 소년법에 대한 주요내용과 비판적 검토 in 법학논총" (2008), 단국대학교
  34. 한국소년법학회, "소년법" (2006), 세창출판사
  35. 한국형사정책연구원, "소년사건처리절차의 개선방안에 관한 연구", ~ (1995)
  36. 홍경호, "법원과 소년보호단체와의 협력", 청소년범죄연구, 2 (1984), 법무부
  37. Albrecht, "Jugendstrafrecht, 3. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
  38. Bm, Alexander, "Einf?rung in das Jugendstrafrecht, 3. Aufl.", ~ (1996)
  39. "Landesgruppe Baden-W?ttemberg in DVJJ, Reform des Jugendstrafrechts", ~ (2003)
  40. Ostendorf, "Jugendgerichtsgesetz, 5. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
  41. Streng, "Jugendstrafrecht", ~ (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)