소년범에 대한 보호관찰의 문제점과 개선방안
A study on the Issues on Juvenile Probation and Parole in The New Revised Juvenile Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The New Revised Juvenile Act introduces several important provision for juvenile offenders. For example, this is Recommendation toward Reconciliation as one of the Protective Disposition. Although in the New Law is not explicitly mentioned “restorative justice”, it is reflected in the recognition of restorative justice, through the provision of "recommendation toward reconciliation" functions. Juveniles should be the target of protection rather than punishment even if they commit a crime, because they are an immature being and are easy to be influenced by environment. New Rrevised Juvenile Law was revised in Korea and created provisions to strengthen human rights for juvenile. The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole has been carried out, based on lots of laws and regulations. The recent amendment of Juvenile law will cause a lot of changes for The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole since they are mainly based on Juvenile law. There are neverthless some challenges to be resolved in order to operate these new systems. The amendment shows the improvement and efforts to solve the problems discussed for a long time, such as the minimum age of juvenile offenders and diverse probation and parole programs. Neverthless, many new programs have left new problems to be solved. Juvenile offenders can be punished both by recently introduced short-term detention in a correctional insitution, as a shock probation, and short-term and long-term probation, following the latest juvenile law. It is needed to analyze the effectiveness of varied programs and to study how to improve the probation system within given sources efficiently. To solve these problems, specialized organizations for juvenile delinquent such as Department of Justice should appoint certain private facilities so that the facilities should be intensively managed and supervised. This study suggest the alternatives to improve the effectiveness of the Protective Disposition. The perception of the disposition should be reshaped to impose proper measures on juveniles who is in early stage of delinquency.
Abstract
The New Revised Juvenile Act introduces several important provision for juvenile offenders. For example, this is Recommendation toward Reconciliation as one of the Protective Disposition. Although in the New Law is not explicitly mentioned “restorative justice”, it is reflected in the recognition of restorative justice, through the provision of "recommendation toward reconciliation" functions. Juveniles should be the target of protection rather than punishment even if they commit a crime, because they are an immature being and are easy to be influenced by environment. New Rrevised Juvenile Law was revised in Korea and created provisions to strengthen human rights for juvenile. The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole has been carried out, based on lots of laws and regulations. The recent amendment of Juvenile law will cause a lot of changes for The Protective Disposition, Juvenile Probation and Parole since they are mainly based on Juvenile law. There are neverthless some challenges to be resolved in order to operate these new systems. The amendment shows the improvement and efforts to solve the problems discussed for a long time, such as the minimum age of juvenile offenders and diverse probation and parole programs. Neverthless, many new programs have left new problems to be solved. Juvenile offenders can be punished both by recently introduced short-term detention in a correctional insitution, as a shock probation, and short-term and long-term probation, following the latest juvenile law. It is needed to analyze the effectiveness of varied programs and to study how to improve the probation system within given sources efficiently. To solve these problems, specialized organizations for juvenile delinquent such as Department of Justice should appoint certain private facilities so that the facilities should be intensively managed and supervised. This study suggest the alternatives to improve the effectiveness of the Protective Disposition. The perception of the disposition should be reshaped to impose proper measures on juveniles who is in early stage of delinquency.
참고문헌 (49)
- 강동구, "소년범에 대한 시설내 처우 및 사회내처우의 연계성 강화방안", 소년보호논집, (7) (2006), 법무부 보호국
- 곽병선, "미국의 소년심판절차에 있어서 변호사의 역할", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.833~848 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 김성언, "소년보호처분의 실효적 실천방안", 형사정책연구, 19(2)통권 : 74, pp.25~62 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김성돈, "우리나라 소년법의 검사선의주의모델의 개선방안", 저스티스, (88), pp.189~210 (2005), 한국법학원
- 김은경, "21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치", 형사정책연구, 18(3)통권 : 71, pp.1159~1188 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 교정단계에서의 회복적 서법의 가능성, "김용세", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구충서 06-43
- 21세기 소년사법개혁의 방향과 과제 Ⅱ, "김은경", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 김재봉, "형사소송법개정안의 양형자료조사제도에 대한 검토", 형사정책, 18(2), pp.213~236 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
- 문정민, "受講命令制度의 現況과 改善策", 矯正硏究, 38, pp.57~82 (2008), 한국교정학회
- 박달현, "현행 소년법상 보호처분의 문제점과 개선방안", 矯正硏究, 36(36), pp.149~173 (2007), 한국교정학회
- 소년범에 대한 중간처우제도 도입에 관한 예비연구, "박미숙", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2006)
- 박미숙, "법무부 소년법개정안 토론문", 소년법 개정법률안 공청회 자료집 (2007), 법무부
- 소년범에 대한 중간처우제도 도입에 관한 예비연구, "법무부", 법무부, ~ (2006)
- 성우제, "소년보호행정의 변화전략", 제10회 소년보호학술대회 발표자료 (2006), 법무부보호국 소년제2과
- 심재무, "한국소년보호제도의 문제점과 그 개선방안", 제6회 한중·형법 학술심포지움 -소년범죄와 소년사법- (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 염기창, "소년보호처분의 실질적 강화방안, In 가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집" (2005), 가사소년제도개혁위원회
- 오영근, "개정 소년법의 과제와 전망", 2008년 춘계 형사정책세미나 자료집 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 오영근, "사회봉사명령의 신동향", 矯正硏究, 35, pp.47~77 (2007), 한국교정학회
- 원혜욱, "소년법 개정안 개요, In 소년법 개정법률안 공청회 자료집" (2007), 법무부
- 원혜욱, "개정소년법의 주요쟁점에 관한 검토 - 보호대상을 중심으로-", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008), 한국소년정책학회
- 이순래, "소년사법의 현황과 소년범죄에 대한 대응전략", 형사정책연구, 18(3)통권 : 71, pp.1047~1080 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이승현, "한국 개정 소년법상 소년의 권리보장", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008)
- 이승현, "소년보호이념과 선의권에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 이옥, "검사선의주의와 법원선의주의", 소년보호연구, (8) (2005)
- 이윤호, "개정소년법시행에 따른 신설제도의 성과분석, In 소년보호 정책용역 논집" (2009)
- 이정주, "최근 소년법개정과 소년보호관찰제도의 과제", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008), 한국소년정책학회
- 이진국, "소년보호대상의 범위에 관한 형사정책적 검토", 형사정책연구, 17(1), pp.89~116 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이춘화, "소년조사제도론" (2007), KSI 한국학술정보
- 21세기 형사사법개혁의 방향과 대국민 법률서비스 개선방안(소년법의 문제점과 개선방안), "장영민", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
- 정유희, "검사 결정전 조사 실무기법제언", 보호 통권, (19) (2007), 법무부
- 정희철, "少年法改正의 理論과 現實: 改正試案의 몇 가지 問題點", 중앙법학, 9(1), pp.223~247 (2007), 중앙법학회
- 최종식, "제6차 소년법개정의 문제점에 관한 고찰", 형사정책, 20(1), pp.351~376 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 한국소년법학회, "소년법" (2006), 세창출판사
- 한숙희, "촉법소년 연령인하에 따른 가정법원의 역할과 과제", 형사정책연구, 19(2)통권 : 74, pp.63~92 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 한영선, "개정소년법의 실효성확보방안 ; 1개월이내 소년원송치(8호)처분을 중심으로", 한국범죄학, 2(2) (2008), 대한 범죄학회
- 한인달, "한국의 개정소년법의 주요내용과 동향", 제6회 한중·형법 학술심포지움-소년범죄와 소년사법 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 菊田幸一, (2009)
- 平野龍一, "講座 少年保護 Ⅱ, In 展望 少年法(3)" (2002)
- 猪懶愼一郞, "少年法のあらたな展開" (2002)
- 八田次郞, "非行少年の敎育と處遇" (2005)
- 石川政興, "少年非行と法" (2001)
- 關哲夫, "少年法の解說" (2008), 一橋出版
- 田宮裕, "注釋 少年法" (2009), 有斐閣
- 久木元伸, "少年法等の一部を改正する法律について", 警察学論集, 60(8) (2007)
- 川淵健司, "少年法改正の意義 , In 裁判所の視点から, 法律ひろば 60- 10" (2007)
- 後藤弘子, "少年法の理念と社会感情, In 少年法の展望" (2000), 現代人文社
- 澤登俊雄, "少年法入門 第2版" (2002)
- 森田宗一, "少年保護の 基礎理念 小川太郞外編, In 少年非行と少年保護" (1960)
- 菊田幸一, "少年法槪說 第4版" (2003)