「소년법」상 ‘검사송치’의 의의 및 기준
‘Transfer of Juvenile offender to Public Prosecutor's Office’ according to the Juvenile Act — Rationales and Parameters for the Juvenile Court’s Ruling —
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of Korean Juvenile Act is to ensure sound fostering of juveniles by carrying out necessary measures for the environmental adjustment and character correction of juveniles demonstrating anti-social behavior. The term “juvenile” means a person under the age of 19, which includes a juvenile under 14 years of age who has violated a penal provision, and yet shall not be criminally responsible under Article 9 of the Korean Criminal Act; and a juvenile from 14 to 19 who has committed a criminal offense, as well. Juveniles cases shall be tried as protection cases by the Juvenile Department of the Family Court or the Juvenile Department of a district court. So, the public prosecutor who has investigated a case of juvenile offender shall transfer the case to the competent Juvenile Department, in cases where it is deemed, as result of investigation of the case, that there is a cause for protective detention. However, in cases where the Juvenile Department has found criminal facts which deserve imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment as a result of an investigation or a trial, and if the Juvenile Department deems it necessary in view of the motive for offending and the nature of the crime committed to impose criminal punishment upon the juvenile concerned, the Juvenile Department shall, by means of a ruling, transfer the case to a public prosecutor. In particular, the Juvenile Department may do so, also in the protection cases transferred from a prosecutor, While the ‘transfer of Juvenile offender to Public Prosecutor’s Office’ takes place quite rarely and in highly exceptional circumstances. it seems nonetheless relevant to examine the law and practice concerning the transfer of Juvenile offender to Public Prosecutor’s Office that opens the way to the criminal prosecution of the juvenile concerned, especially in regard to the primary goals of the juvenile justice system. This article outlines the procedure of the transfer to Public Prosecutor’s Office under the Korean Juvenile Act, reviews the debate about the requirements for the Juvenile Court’s Ruling of the transfer to a public prosecutor, and demonstrates that the rationales and parameters for the transfer of Juvenile offender to Public Prosecutor’s Office can be understood in relation to the role of education in juvenile justice.
Abstract
The purpose of Korean Juvenile Act is to ensure sound fostering of juveniles by carrying out necessary measures for the environmental adjustment and character correction of juveniles demonstrating anti-social behavior. The term “juvenile” means a person under the age of 19, which includes a juvenile under 14 years of age who has violated a penal provision, and yet shall not be criminally responsible under Article 9 of the Korean Criminal Act; and a juvenile from 14 to 19 who has committed a criminal offense, as well. Juveniles cases shall be tried as protection cases by the Juvenile Department of the Family Court or the Juvenile Department of a district court. So, the public prosecutor who has investigated a case of juvenile offender shall transfer the case to the competent Juvenile Department, in cases where it is deemed, as result of investigation of the case, that there is a cause for protective detention. However, in cases where the Juvenile Department has found criminal facts which deserve imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment as a result of an investigation or a trial, and if the Juvenile Department deems it necessary in view of the motive for offending and the nature of the crime committed to impose criminal punishment upon the juvenile concerned, the Juvenile Department shall, by means of a ruling, transfer the case to a public prosecutor. In particular, the Juvenile Department may do so, also in the protection cases transferred from a prosecutor, While the ‘transfer of Juvenile offender to Public Prosecutor’s Office’ takes place quite rarely and in highly exceptional circumstances. it seems nonetheless relevant to examine the law and practice concerning the transfer of Juvenile offender to Public Prosecutor’s Office that opens the way to the criminal prosecution of the juvenile concerned, especially in regard to the primary goals of the juvenile justice system. This article outlines the procedure of the transfer to Public Prosecutor’s Office under the Korean Juvenile Act, reviews the debate about the requirements for the Juvenile Court’s Ruling of the transfer to a public prosecutor, and demonstrates that the rationales and parameters for the transfer of Juvenile offender to Public Prosecutor’s Office can be understood in relation to the role of education in juvenile justice.
참고문헌 (37)
- 金東林, "少年法" (2000)
- 김혁, "형사책임연령과 소년법 개정 논의에 대한 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 21(1), pp.257~286 (2019), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
- 박상기, "형사정책" (2010)
- 박호현, "소년법 개정논의에 대한 고찰 - 소년사법의 보호이념 강화를 중심으로 -", 동아법학, (78), pp.1~26 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 배종대, "형사정책" (2019)
- 법원공무원교육원, "소년사건실무" (2009)
- 법원행정처, "사법연감" (2019)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요: 소년" (2014)
- 사법정책연구원, "소년 형사사법절차의 개선에 관한 연구 통합적 운용가능성을 중심으로" (2019)
- 오영근, "개정소년법의 과제와 전망", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.5~24 (2008), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 유진식, "少年法" (1982)
- 이순래, "소년사법의 현황과 소년범죄에 대한 대응전략", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.1047~1080 (2007), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 이은영, "소년사법제도의 엄벌화 경향에 대한 비판적 고찰", 교정복지연구, (42), pp.25~60 (2016), 한국교정복지학회
- 각국의 소년원제도에 관한 연구, "정재준", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 02-27 (2002)
- 최병각, "소년사법의 방향과 과제", 소년보호연구, 26, pp.29~56 (2014), 한국소년정책학회
- 한국소년법학회, "소년법" (2006)
- 소년조사제도의 개선방안에 대한 연구, "홍영오", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구총서 11-07 (2011)
- 安藤正博, "講座少年保護2: 少年法と少年審判" (1982)
- 岩井宜子, "保護処分と刑事処分の関係について", 家庭裁判月報, 32(12) (1980)
- 大森政輔, "検察官送致決定の実質的要件", 別冊判例タイムズ, (6) (1979)
- 大森政輔, "少年に対する刑罰処遇について’", 家庭裁判月報, 28(4) (1976)
- 澤登俊雄, "入門少年法, 第2版" (2001)
- 大塚仁博 士古稀祝賀, "刑事法学の総合的検討(上)-福田平", pp.1993, 澤登俊雄
- 澤登俊雄, "犯罪者処遇制度論(上)" (1975)
- 葛野尋之, "少年司法における保護理念の再構築に向けて - アメリカ少 年司法の教訓から", 刑法雑誌, 36(3) (1997)
- 葛野尋之, "少年法における検察官送致決定の意義 - 家庭裁判所の説明責 任 -", 立命館法学, (283) (2002)
- 武内謙治, "少年法講義" (2015)
- 武内謙治, "少年司法における保護の構造: 適正手続成長発達権保障と少 年司法改革の展望" (2014)
- 多田元, "司法福祉の焦点" (1994)
- 田宮裕, "条文解説少年法" (1986)
- 田宮裕, "注釈少年法" (2002), 改訂版
- 団藤重光, "新版少年法, 第二版" (1984)
- 丸山雅夫, "少年法20条における刑事処分相当性’", 産大法学, 34(3) (2000)
- 村井敏邦, "刑事訴訟法" (1996)
- 吉岡一男, "少年法判例百選" (1996)
- 鷲尾祐喜義, "改正少年法の課題と展望", 人間の福祉, (24) (2010)
- 渡邊一弘, "少年審判における刑事処分相当判断に関する実証的研究’", 専修法研論集, (28) (2001)
