경쟁법의 역외적용에 대한 법적검토 - 역외적용 이론의 발전 및 적용상의 문제점을 중심으로 -
Extraterritorial application of Competition Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Due to globalization of economy, competition law offenses in a country might discourage the welfare of consumers in other countries and cause market disturbance. Thus each country has been putting every efforts to regulate this if any enterprises, in spite of belonging to other countries, influence on their own countries. What requested for that is to develop the application theory of competition law and consolidation of relevant regulations. The main theories to apply their country's competition law to the one of other countries are Effect Doctrine, Economic Single Unit Doctrine and Place of Implementation Theory. In case of the United States, even though there was a jurisdictional rule of reason through Interest balancing approach in the past, it has consistently applied its own Sherman Act to other countries in accordance with Effect Doctrine. And the related legislative system also has been revised or legislated to support this. In case of Europe, EU-Commission has been driving European competition policy under Effect Doctrine, but the Court of Justice of the European Communities has been applying competition law with Economic Single Unit Doctrine and Place of Implementation Theory. Though the Court of First Instance employed Effect Doctrine in the case of Gancor judgement, the Court of Justice of the European Communities still do not admit Effect Doctrine explicitly. In case of Korea, it didn't make a huge improvement regarding extraterritorial Application of competition law in the past. From the previous cases of black-lead electrode and vitamin, however, it came to have much interest in extraterritorial application of its competition law. The black-lead electrode case mentioned above has a great meaning in terms of extraterritorial application of Korea's competition law. In this case, Korea Fair Trade Commission put its focus based on Effects Doctrine and established provisions on extraterritorial application of The Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act with this as a momentum. Extraterritorial application of competition law is the area that there is a sharp conflict of interests between nations on this point, so there is no unified international standards. Even though there have been much efforts on this, good results have not been produced because of conflict of interests. In recent times, accordingly, cooperative relations regarding extraterritorial application each other have been established by means of bilateral cooperation agreement or bilateral trade agreement including FTA. Integration of global economy seems to be more accelerated in the near future and there would be many problems emerged from extraterritorial application of competition law as business markets are expanded. In this respect, more in-depth discussion on this matter has to be done.
참고문헌 (18)
- 공정거래위원회, "2008년 국정감사 업무보고 자료", ~
- 권오승, "공정거래법강의 II" (2000), 법문사
- 권오승, "자유경쟁과 공정거래" (2002), 법문사
- 김대순, "EU법의 연구" (2007), 삼영사
- 徐東源, "외국 사업자에 대한 공정거래법의 역외적용+B10", 공법연구, 33(5), pp.579~602 (2005), 한국공법학회
- 심영섭, "경쟁법 역외적용의 세계적 확산과 그 함의", 산업연구원, ~ (2007)
- 윤세리, "독점금지법의 역외적용 - 1995년 미국 독점금지법의 국제적 사업활동에 대한 적용지침을 중심으로 -", 통상법률 (1995)
- 정환, "독점규제법의 역외적용", 서울대학교 법과대학 발표자료, ~ (2002)
- 한국국제경제법학회, "국제경제법" (2007), 박영사
- 金井貴嗣, "獨占禁止法" (2008), 弘文堂
- Alison Jones, "EC Competition Law, 3.ed." (2008), Oxford University Press
- Christian Calliess, "Kommentar zu EU-Vertrag und EG-Vertrag, 2. Aufl" (2002), Luchterhand
- Giorgio Monti, "EC Competition Law" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Michael Kling, "Kartellrecht" (2007), Verlag Franz Vahlen
- OECD, "Hard Core Cartels", OECD, ~ (2002)
- Randolph Tritell, "The Federal Trade Commissions's International Antitrust Program" (2008), FTC
- EGV, "EUV", pp.2003, Rudolf Streinz
- Volker Emmerich, "Kartellrecht, 10.Aufl" (2006), C.H.Beck
