경쟁법의 역외적용과 대응방안에 관한 연구
A Study on the Possible Responses to the Extraterritorial Application of Competition Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
It is a general tendency to implement the so-called extraterritorial application of competition law in the global market. There is not any difference, regarding this tendency, between the United States and the European countries which have been sensitive to competition issues for several centuries, and Japan and China which are our daily partners in trading. Furthermore, our government itself has prepared similar rules handling the extraterritorial application. Because of this tough policy, our great firms have gotten various sanctions from American and European governments, and, in some cases, staff members of those firms have been imprisoned in foreign correctional institutions. What it makes worse is that, if one company violates any competition law in a certain nation, other nations will target that company and impose, through a thorough investigation of its branches and affiliates, multiple sanctions including the triple damages compensation orders. More importantly, the principle of extraterritorial application is not just limited to the competition and international trade lawsuits, but applicable to nearly all the disputes which normally occur in the global level under the name of Intellectual Property, Securities Transaction, and Corporate Income Tax. Thus, our companies will be more and more vulnerable to the international governance, and this will negatively affect to our general profitability and to our economic reliance and development. All the companies need to be prepared to this change in the global market and try to response effectively to various sorts of disputes. Since international disputes cannot be easily settled by the private companies, the government and the authorities should support them in overcoming this obstacle and prepare more advanced systems with regard to competition law and policy.
참고문헌 (18)
- 金石鎬, "E.U. 競爭法의 域外適用- 美國(U.S.A.)의 경우와의 대비적 관점에서 -", 국제법학회논총, 47(1), pp.1~22 (2002), 대한국제법학회
- 김원기, "국제카르텔에 대한 독점규제법의 역외적용", 기업법연구, 20(4), pp.385~410 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 박정구, "글로벌시대의 경쟁정책 국제화 방안-경쟁법 역외적용의 문제점과 개선방안을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 23(4) (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 신현윤, "현행 독점규제법의 역외적용", 연세법학연구, 2 (1992), 연세법학회
- 심재한, "EU법의 역외적용", 공정경쟁, (60) (2000), 한국공정거래협회
- 윤세리, "미국 반트러스트법의 역외적용 : 최근의 동향과 시사점", 공정경쟁, (60) (2000), 한국공정거래협회
- 이문지, "공정거래법의 역외적용에 관해 검토해야 할 문제", 공정경쟁, (60) (2000), 한국공정거래협회
- 이문지, "독점규제법의 역외적용에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- 장준혁, "國家 立法管轄權의 場所的 範圍 : 美國 對外關係法 第3次 리스테이트먼트 第402條와 第403條", 중앙법학, 7(1), pp.379~305 (2005), 중앙법학회
- 정호열, "미국의 대외통상정책과 경쟁정책의 충돌, 조화", 비교사법, 10(4), pp.51~80 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 정환, "미국 독점금지법의 역외적용", 공정경쟁, 81 (2002), 한국공정거래협회
- 최승필, "경쟁법의 역외적용에 대한 법적검토 - 역외적용 이론의 발전 및 적용상의 문제점을 중심으로 -", 외법논집, 33(1), pp.205~233 (2009), 법학연구소
- 허선, "국제카르텔에 대한 공정거래법 역외적용의 경험과 논리: 흑연전극봉 국제카르텔 사건을 중심으로", 경쟁법연구, 9 (2003), 한국경쟁법학회
- "FTC and DOJ Plan Analysis of Past Merger Enforcement Cases"[URL]
- Honeywell Mergers, "Differences in Merger Analysis between the United States and the European Union, Highlighted in the Context of the BoeinglMcDonnel Douglas and GE", pp.2004, Karacan, Pinar
- Perez, Antonio F, "International Antitrust at the Crossroads;The End of Antitrust History or the Clash of Competition Policy Civilization?" (2002), Law and Policy in International Business
- Riazi, Jaafar A, "Finding Subject Matter Jurisdiction over Antitrust Claims of Extraterritorial Origin:Whether the Seventh Circuit's Approach Properly Balances Policies of International Comity and Deterrence" (2005), DePaul Law Review
- Sprigman, Christopher, "Fix Prices Globally, Get Sued Locally? U.S. Jurisdiction over International Cartells" (2005), University of Chicago Law Leview
