본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국에서의 원치 않는 아이 소송의 역사와 법적 쟁점 - 기존의 논의에 대한 비판적 검토를 겸하여 -

The history and legal issues of the action for damages resulting from an unwanted child in the United States

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

The actions for damages resulting from an unwanted child has been discussed in practice first in Korea. And then the academic scholars have taken the subject into account by analysing precedents in the United States. Thus, the United States' discourse on the actions for damages resulting from an unwanted child is reflected on our legal theories and precedents. The actions for damages resulting from an unwanted child, in fact, are under the jurisdiction of state and regulated by state courts in the United States. So, it is difficult to find out a unified view. But it is necessary to research the history of actions for damages resulting from an unwanted child in the United States focusing on leading cases and to put in order standpoints of state court cases from the horizontal aspect. The history of actions for damages resulting from unwanted child has started in the 1930s and developed into the direction of permitting and extending reliefs in the United States. However, the cases are not always advantage to plaintiffs. For the present, there is a lively controversy on permissibility and its extent of damages. Most of states approve medical expenses and consolation money resulting from wrongful conception and birth. However, an heated debate is going on the approval of child-rearing costs. While the child-rearing costs of a healthy child are approved by a few state courts, the additional child-rearing costs of an abnormal child are approved by a half of the states. In case of wrongful life, only a few states approve additional child-rearing costs.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 강신웅, "미국판례법에서의 不願兒문제", 법학논집, 5, pp.349~378 (1999), 조선대
  2. 박영호, "wrongful conception과 wrongful birth 등에 대한 손해배상", 판례월보, 통권 : 360, pp.12~20 (2000)
  3. 이덕환, "wrongful life에 대한 미국판례의 고찰", 한양법학, 10, pp.7~26 (1999)
  4. 이덕환, "wrongful conception에 대한 미국 판례의 고찰", 법학논총, 17, pp.183~210 (2000), 한양대
  5. 이덕환, "임신전 불법행위 - 미국판례를 중심으로 -", 의료법학, (창간), pp.95~138 (2000)
  6. 이덕환, "wrongful birth 법리에 관한 미국 판례의 고찰, in: 현대민사법연구 (일헌최병욱교수 정년기념논문집)", pp.489~522 (2002)
  7. 이은영, "원치 않은 아이에 따른 손해배상에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  8. 이은영, "법여성주의적 관점에서 본 출산관련 불법행위", 법과사회, (36), pp.421~449 (2009), 법과사회이론학회
  9. Dieter Giesen, "International Medical Malpractice Law", J.C.B. Mohr (1988)
  10. Claudia Junker, "Pflichtverletzung, Kindesexistenz und Schadensersatz: wrongful life, wrongful birth, wrongful pregnancy, wrongful adoption & wrongful parenthood" (2002), D.&H.,
  11. Harvey Teff, "The Actions for "Wrongful Life" in England and the United States", International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 34, pp.423~441 (1985)
  12. Ken Mason, "The Troubled Pregnancy" (2007), Cambridge U.P.
  13. Anthony Jackson, "Action for wrongful life, wrongful pregnancy, and wrongful birth in the United States and England", Loyola L.A. International & Comparative Law Journal, 17, pp.535~613 (1995)
  14. Mary Sullivan, "Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Conception: A Parent's need for a cause of action", Journal of Law and Health, 15, pp.105~120 (2000)
  15. Adrian Whitfield, "Actions Arising from Birth, in: Principles of Medical Law. 2nd ed", pp.789~851 (2004), OUP
  16. Kathleen Mahoney, "Malpractice Claims Resulting from Negligent Preconception Genetic Testing : Do These Claims Present a Strain of Wrongful Birth or Wrongful Conception, and Does the Categorization even Matters?", Suffolk University Law Review, 39, pp.773~793 (2006)
  17. Donal Nolan, "New Forms of Damages in Negligence", Modern Law Review, 70, pp.59~88 (2007)
  18. Michael Murtaugh, "Wrongful Birth: The Courts' Dilemma in Determining a Remedy for a ‘Blessed Event’", Pace Law Review, 27, pp.241~304 (2007)
  19. Michelle McEntire, "Compensating Post-conception Prenatal Medical Malpractice While Respecting Life : A Recommendation to North Carolina Legislators", Campbell Law Review, 29, pp.761~797 (2007)
  20. Kathryn Vikingstad, "The Use and Abuse of the Tort Benefit Rule in Wrongful Parentage Cases", Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, pp.1063~1106 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)