본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

원치 않은 장애아 출산에 대한 손해배상

The recovery of damage caused by the unwanted birth of unhealthy child

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The recovery of damage from unwanted birth of unhealthy child entalils the issue of value embedded in human life. It can't be addressed and considered based only on general theory of law associated with the recovery of damage, but on philosophical and ethical considerations. Therefore, there have been both complicated and subtle controversies over whether and to what extent each country recognizes the recovery of damage caused by the birth of unhealthy child. As discussed above, the unwanted birth of unhealthy child is attracting more and more attention among the community members dealing with legal cases and theories. However, it is just at a burgeoning stage at the moment. Theoretical foundations don't seem to be solid on the issue of whether and to what extent to recognize the recovery of damage in the case of the unwanted birth of unhealthy child. As mentioned before, conventional theory of law has to be applied in deciding the level of recovery, away from both philosophical and ethical aspects surrounding recognition of the damage inflicted on the child. So, the parents should be entitled to both the whole costs of child-rearing and recovery for emotional distress. The unhealthy child itself should be given ordinary costs of care and extra-ordinary costs of care, as well. This way of approach seems to be both rational and desirable given that it improves the welfare of unhealthy child in general and is consistent with law of theory associated recovery of damage in particular.

Abstract

The recovery of damage from unwanted birth of unhealthy child entalils the issue of value embedded in human life. It can't be addressed and considered based only on general theory of law associated with the recovery of damage, but on philosophical and ethical considerations. Therefore, there have been both complicated and subtle controversies over whether and to what extent each country recognizes the recovery of damage caused by the birth of unhealthy child. As discussed above, the unwanted birth of unhealthy child is attracting more and more attention among the community members dealing with legal cases and theories. However, it is just at a burgeoning stage at the moment. Theoretical foundations don't seem to be solid on the issue of whether and to what extent to recognize the recovery of damage in the case of the unwanted birth of unhealthy child. As mentioned before, conventional theory of law has to be applied in deciding the level of recovery, away from both philosophical and ethical aspects surrounding recognition of the damage inflicted on the child. So, the parents should be entitled to both the whole costs of child-rearing and recovery for emotional distress. The unhealthy child itself should be given ordinary costs of care and extra-ordinary costs of care, as well. This way of approach seems to be both rational and desirable given that it improves the welfare of unhealthy child in general and is consistent with law of theory associated recovery of damage in particular.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 姜信雄, "원하지 않은 아이의 출생에 관한 의사의 책임", 7(2) (2000), 한국비교사법학회
  2. 姜熙遠, "의학기술의 발전과 손해의 개념", (254) (1997)
  3. 金閔中, "의료분쟁의 법률지식" (2000), 청림출판
  4. 金天秀, "기형아의 출산과 의사의 설명해태책임" (2000), 박영사
  5. 朴永浩, "Wrongful Conception과 Wrongful Birth 등에 대한 손해배상", (360) (2000)
  6. 申鉉昊, "의료소송총론" (1997), 육법사
  7. 尹眞秀, "의사의 과실에 의한 자녀의 출생으로 인한 손해배상책임" (1999)
  8. 尹眞秀, "의사의 과실에 의한 자녀의 출생으로 인한 손해배상책임" (2000), 박영사
  9. 鄭泰綸, "기회상실의 손해에 관한 연구", 5(1) (1998)
  10. LACOUR DE CASSATION, "의 조직과 운영", 59 (1992)
  11. 崔載千, "“원치 않은 아이”와 손해배상개념", (256) (1997)
  12. 服部篤美, "先天性風疹症候群兒出生事件", (140) (1996)
  13. 福田淸明, "望まない出産に基づく損害賠償請求-先天性障碍兒の出産と財産的損害-明治學院論叢", 65 (1998)
  14. "醫療過誤判例百選", (140) (1996), 有斐閣
  15. Alan J. Belsky, "Injury as a matter of law Is this the answer to the wrongful life dilemma?"
  16. Alexander M. Capron, "informde Decisionmaking in Genetic Counselling A Dissent to the ″wrongful life″. Debate"
  17. C. Mccormick, "Handbook on the law of damages. 1983."
  18. Capron, "Tort Liability in Genetic Counseling", pp.79~
  19. Lauer C. H. Hoyano, "Misconcepteion about wrongful conception", (65) (2002)
  20. M. Gobert, "A propos de l′arrett du 17 novembre 2000" (2000), Petites affiches
  21. Mark Strasser, "Misconception and wrongful birth; A call for a principled jurisprudence", 31 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)