원치 않은 아이 소송의 개념정의와 유형화에 대한 새로운 시도
A New Attempt at Defintion & Typication of Action for Damages resulting from a Unwanted Child
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The possibility of birth-related torts by medical doctors or health care providers has been increased with the medical malpractices of contraception, sterilization, TOP(termination of pregnancy) and ART(Assisted Reproductive Technologies). Among birth-related torts, in the case of that an unwanted child is being pregnant or is born caused by medical malpractice, parents or children bring lawsuits against medical doctors or health care providers for damages. These actions are called as claims for damages resulting from unwanted children in general. These actions for damages resulting from unwanted children can be divided into wrongful pregnancy, wrongful birth and wrongful life. Traditionally the wrongful pregnancy action means an action brought against a doctor or hospital that pregnant women was delivered of health child caused by medical malpractice in order for a patent, while the wrongful birth action is and action for damages resulting from the birth of an abnormality child caused by medical malpractice. The wrongful life action, on the other hand, is brought by the very child against a doctor who caused unwanted birth to claim for damages resulting from by his or her own birth. But, the traditional definition of these actions went wrong. This article, therefore, attempts a new definition and classification. According to the new definition the wrongful pregnancy action can be brought against a doctor or hospital to caused medical malpractice in order for a parent to seek the damages for the pregnancy itself, while the wrongful birth action is an action for damages resulting from the birth of an unwanted child caused by medical malpractice, regardless of child's abnormality. The wrongful life action, on the other hand, is brought by the very child against a doctor who caused unwanted birth to claim for damages resulting from by his or her own birth. In addition, actions for damages resulting from an unwanted child can be divided into actions resulting from wanted/unwanted pregnancy, TOP, birth in accordance with the wish of parents, and actions by healthy/unhealthy child and/or parents in accordance with the condition of their health.
참고문헌 (33)
- 신현호, "의료소송총론" (1997), 육법사
- 김민중, "원치 않은 아이에 관한 의사의 손해배상책임 - 국․내외 판례를 중심으로", 법학연구, 22, pp.223~244 (2001), 전북대
- 박영호, "Wrongful Conception과 Wrongful Birth 등에 대한 손해배상", 판례월보, 통권 : 360, pp.12~20 (2000)
- 윤진수, "의사의 과실에 의한 자녀의 출생으로 인한 손해배상책임(하)", 법조, 48(8), pp.28~58
- 이광범, "판례의 의미와 구속력에 관한 소고", pp.237~258 (2003), 박영사
- 이덕환, "wrongful conception에 관한 미국판례의 고찰", 법학논총, 17, pp.183~209 (2000), 한양대
- 이덕환, "원치 않은 장야야 출산에 대한 손해배상", 법학논총, 24(2), pp.483~509 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이은영, "원치 않은 아이에 따른 손해배상에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 이은영, "법여성주의적 관점에서 본 출산관련 불법행위", 법과사회, 36(36), pp.421~449 (2009), 법과사회이론학회
- 전병남, "원치않은 아이의 출생과 관련된 우리나라의 판례와 학설의 동향", 대한의료법학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회 자료집 (2000)
- 최재천, "원치 않은 아이와 손해배상책임", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 256, pp.81~98 (1997)
- D. Giesen, "International Medical Malpractice Law" (1988), J.C.B. Mohr
- I. Kennedy, "Medical law" (2000), Betterworths
- A. Laufs, "Handbuch des Arztrechts" (2002), C.H.Beck
- C. Junker, "Kindesexistenz und Schadensersatz - Wrongful Life, Wrongful Birth, Wrongful Pregnancy, Wrongful Adoption & Wrongful Parenthood" (2002), D.&H
- E. Deutsch, "Medizinrecht" (2003), Springer
- E. Jackson, "Medical Law" (2006), OUP
- K. Mason, "The Troubled Pregnancy" (2007), Cambridge UP
- H. Teff, "The Action for Wrongful Life in England and the United States", International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 34, pp.423~441 (1985)
- A. Jackson, "Action for wrongful life, wrongful pregnancy, and wrongful birth in the United States and England", Loyola L.A. International & Comparative Law Journal, 17, pp.535~613 (1995)
- R. Backhaus, "Inwieweit darf die Unterhaltspflicht für ein Kind als Schaden bewertet werden?", MedR 14, 201~205 (1996)
- M. Strasser, "Wrongful Life, Wrongful Birth, Wrongful Death, and the Right to Refuse Treatment: Can Reasonable Jurisdictions Recognize All But One?", Missouri Law Review, 64, pp.29~141 (1999)
- S. Pattinson, "Wrongful Life Actions as a Means of Regulating Use of Genetic and Reproductive Technologies", Health Law Journal, 7, pp.19~32 (1999)
- B. Losch, "'Wrongful birth' und 'wrongful life'. Probleme der rechtlichen Bewältigung ärztlicher Pflichtverletzung bei der menschlichen Reproduktion", Ethik in der Medizin, 12, pp.30~43 (2000)
- K. Wilcoxon, "Statutory Remedies For Judicial Torts: The Need For Wrongful Birth Legislation", University of Cincinnati Law Review, 69, pp.1023~1053 (2001)
- L. Hoyano, "Misconception about Wrongful Conception", The Modern LawReview, 65, pp.883~906 (2002)
- A. Whitfield, "Actions Arising from Birth, Principles of Medical Law", pp.789~851 (2004), OUP
- D. Stretton, "The Birth Torts: Damages for Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life", Deakin Law Review, 10, pp.319~364 (2005)
- M. Pritchard, "Can there be such thing as a 'wrongful birth'", sability & Society, 20, pp.81~93 (2005)
- K. Mahoney, "Malpractice Claims Resulting from Negligent Preconception Genetic Testing : Do These Claims Present a Strain of Wrongful Birth or Wrongful Conception, and Does the Categorization even matters?", Suffolk University Law Review, 39, pp.773~793 (2006)
- M. McEntire, "Compensating Post-conception Prenatal Medical Malpractice While Respecting Life : A Recommendation to North Carolina Legislators", Campbell Law Review, 29, pp.761~797 (2007)
- K. Vikingstad, "The Use and Abuse of the Tort Benefit Rule in Wrongful Parentage Cases", Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, pp.1063~1106 (2007)
- M. Murtaugh, "Wrongful Birth: The Courts' Dilemma in Determining a Remedy for a ‘Blessed Event’", Pace Law Review 27, 27, pp.241~304 (2007)