본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사외이사제도의 문제점과 개선방안

Issues and Solutions Regarding the Outside Director System for Corporations

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Approximately ten years have passed since the introduction of the outside director system in Korea, which was implemented in accordance with the recommendations of the IMF in 1997. The outside director system is an institutional device for establishing transparency, responsibility and the healthy management of corporations. The purpose of the outside director system is to facilitate transparency in the decision-making processes by a corporation’s management by the appointment of an independent outside director to the corporation’s board of directors, and to improve effectiveness of corporate management by strengthening the supervisory and oversight functions of the board. However, there has been criticism of the outside director system in Korea, on the basis that it does not effectively perform the supervisory and control functions with respect to a corporation’s senior officers, which is not consistent with the original intent of the system. In this thesis, I will first outline the concept, background and intended functions of an outside director system, discuss the status of outside director systems in other advanced countries, and then discuss relevant issues in respect of the practical operation of the current outside director system in Korea. Thereafter, I will recommend solutions relating to the relevant issues raised thereby. As of now, the outside director system is the global standard. Corporations should acknowledge outside directors as health inspectors who play a beneficial role. Moreover, competent outside directors will increase a corporation’s competitiveness and, thus, contribute to a corporation’s development and growth.

Abstract

Approximately ten years have passed since the introduction of the outside director system in Korea, which was implemented in accordance with the recommendations of the IMF in 1997. The outside director system is an institutional device for establishing transparency, responsibility and the healthy management of corporations. The purpose of the outside director system is to facilitate transparency in the decision-making processes by a corporation’s management by the appointment of an independent outside director to the corporation’s board of directors, and to improve effectiveness of corporate management by strengthening the supervisory and oversight functions of the board. However, there has been criticism of the outside director system in Korea, on the basis that it does not effectively perform the supervisory and control functions with respect to a corporation’s senior officers, which is not consistent with the original intent of the system. In this thesis, I will first outline the concept, background and intended functions of an outside director system, discuss the status of outside director systems in other advanced countries, and then discuss relevant issues in respect of the practical operation of the current outside director system in Korea. Thereafter, I will recommend solutions relating to the relevant issues raised thereby. As of now, the outside director system is the global standard. Corporations should acknowledge outside directors as health inspectors who play a beneficial role. Moreover, competent outside directors will increase a corporation’s competitiveness and, thus, contribute to a corporation’s development and growth.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 강희갑, "우리나라 주식회사의 이사회 및 사외이사의 길태와 그 개선방안 - 경영감독기능을 중심으로-", 비교사법, 9(2) (2002), 한국비교사법학회
  2. 주식회사의 경영감독 ․ 감사 및 감사위원회제도에 관한 연구, "강희갑", 상장협 연구보고서, ~ (2002)
  3. 김영균, "사외이사의 책임제한ㆍ완화론에 대한 비판적 검토", 기업법연구, 21(2)통권 : 29, pp.97~126 (2007), 한국기업법학회
  4. 박강익, "상법상 주식회사 이사의 의무와 미국법상의 충실의무", 법학연구, (18), pp.669~683 (2005), 한국법학회
  5. 이효경, "일본의 사외이사제도를 둘러싼 최근 동향과 과제", 재산법연구, 27(2), pp.385~412 (2010), 한국재산법학회
  6. 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2009), 법문사
  7. 정준우, "理事會의 經營監督機能 强化를 위한 社外理事制度의 導入?運營과 그 問題點 - 우리나라와 일본의 학설?판례를 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 20(3)통권 : 26, pp.163~186 (2006), 한국기업법학회
  8. 사외이사제도 개선방안에 관한 연구, "정찬영", 한국상장회사협의회, ~ (2010)
  9. 정찬영, "상법강의(상) 제13판" (2010), 박영사
  10. 정쾌영, "사외이사제도의 문제점과 개선방향", 기업법연구, 19(2)통권 : 21, pp.55~82 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  11. 최완진, "사외이사제도", 고시연구, 제27집, (5) (2000), 고시연구사
  12. 최완진, "사외이사제도에 관한 재검토", 기업법연구, 5 (2000), 한국기업법학회
  13. 최완진, "상법학강의" (2009), 법문사
  14. 전국경제인연합회, "주요국 회사법", ~ (2009)
  15. 한국상장회사협의회, "2010년 상장회사 주주총회백서", ~ (2009)
  16. 한국상장회사협의회, "2010년 상장법인 사외이사 선임현황 분석" (2010), 상장
  17. American Law Institute, "Principles of Corporate Governance; Analysis and Recommendations", ~ (1994)
  18. Aronson v, "The Business Judgement Rule, Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Directors", Aspen Law & Bus, 473, pp.805~816 (1998)
  19. Financial Reporting Council, "The Combined Code on Corporate Governance" (2006), Preamble 4
  20. Hamilton, R. W, "The Law of Corporations in a Nutshell" (1996), West Publishing
  21. Harry G.hemm, "Laws of corporations In Restructuring the Corporate Board of Directors", pp.280~ (1983), Westing Publishing Co
  22. James D. Cox, "Corporations" (1977), Aspen Law & Business
  23. Janet Cooper Alexander, "Do The Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Actions" (1991), 43 Stan. L. Rev
  24. Solomon, Palmiter, "Corporations Examples and Explanations" (1999), Aspen Law & Business

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)