본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

금융회사의 사외이사 제도

Outside Director System of Financial Institutions

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Outside Director System which controls corporate management is designed to enhance transparency and legitimacy in corporate management through reform of the Board of Directors, ensure democratization of organizational management, improve corporate fundamentals and strengthen competitiveness. When the System was first introduced, it was an unfamiliar system. However, although sufficient time has passed to establish the System in the domestic law systems and corporate culture, controversy still lingers over effectiveness and functions of the Outside Director System. In particular,since financial companies have impact on the entire economy, they have been closely observed all the time and under the tougher regulatory environment. This paper reviewed systematical aspects of the domestic Outside Director System of financial companies with focus on laws and regulations and analyzed the System in comparison with relevant recent proposals and regulations of global organizations such as Basel Committee on Banking System(BCBS), Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Financial Stability Board(FSB) to present measures to improve the System and help the System take firm root in Korea. However, although relevant systems have been considerably established in Korea, the reason for the lingering controversy is a matter of people and their awareness. A system always has limitations. Without a positive understanding of role and functions of outside directors and voluntary efforts, it is difficult for the System to perform its role. In general, it is considered that success of the Outside Director System depends on independence and professionalism of outside directors, sufficient time and their awareness of responsibility. Financial companies are no exception. Of course, it is also recognized that possible system risks,importance of risk management of the Board of Directors and professionalism of outside directors for a better understanding of the financial industry may be more highlighted in financial companies. However,independence should not be compromised for such reasons. Independence of outside directors plays the most important part in enhancing the functions of the domestic Outside Director System of financial companies and helping outside directors perform their roles. Therefore,outside directors should be selected in a transparent and fair manner. Systematic supports and regulations should be established to help independent outside directors selected under this condition supplement their professionalism, invest sufficient time and make a responsible decision.

Abstract

The Outside Director System which controls corporate management is designed to enhance transparency and legitimacy in corporate management through reform of the Board of Directors, ensure democratization of organizational management, improve corporate fundamentals and strengthen competitiveness. When the System was first introduced, it was an unfamiliar system. However, although sufficient time has passed to establish the System in the domestic law systems and corporate culture, controversy still lingers over effectiveness and functions of the Outside Director System. In particular,since financial companies have impact on the entire economy, they have been closely observed all the time and under the tougher regulatory environment. This paper reviewed systematical aspects of the domestic Outside Director System of financial companies with focus on laws and regulations and analyzed the System in comparison with relevant recent proposals and regulations of global organizations such as Basel Committee on Banking System(BCBS), Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Financial Stability Board(FSB) to present measures to improve the System and help the System take firm root in Korea. However, although relevant systems have been considerably established in Korea, the reason for the lingering controversy is a matter of people and their awareness. A system always has limitations. Without a positive understanding of role and functions of outside directors and voluntary efforts, it is difficult for the System to perform its role. In general, it is considered that success of the Outside Director System depends on independence and professionalism of outside directors, sufficient time and their awareness of responsibility. Financial companies are no exception. Of course, it is also recognized that possible system risks,importance of risk management of the Board of Directors and professionalism of outside directors for a better understanding of the financial industry may be more highlighted in financial companies. However,independence should not be compromised for such reasons. Independence of outside directors plays the most important part in enhancing the functions of the domestic Outside Director System of financial companies and helping outside directors perform their roles. Therefore,outside directors should be selected in a transparent and fair manner. Systematic supports and regulations should be established to help independent outside directors selected under this condition supplement their professionalism, invest sufficient time and make a responsible decision.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 이철송, "회사법 강의" (2005), 박영사
  2. 정동윤, "회사법" (2005), 법문사
  3. 미국 금융개혁법의 주요 내용 및 시사점, "정찬우", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2010)
  4. 최준선, "회사법" (2006), 삼영사
  5. 전국은행연합회, "은행 등 사외이사 모범규준", ~ (2010)
  6. 사외이사의 독립성 및 전문성 제고방안, "한국기업지배구조원", 한국기업지배구조개선지원센터, ~ (2007)
  7. 기업지배구조개선위원회, "기업지배구조 모범규준", ~ (2003)
  8. 金容九, "社外理事制度에 관한 硏究", 기업법연구, 10, pp.347~372 (2002), 한국기업법학회
  9. 김용열, "사회이사제도와 이사회 개혁", 상장, (2) (2005), 한국상장회사협의회
  10. 박강익, "사외이사의 현황과 문제점에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.177~200 (2007), 한국기업법학회
  11. 양동석, "사외이사제도의 운영현황과 활성화 방안", 기업법연구, 8 (2001), 한국기업법학회
  12. 이균성, "주식회사의 사외이사의 지위", 상사법연구, 20(1) (2001), 상사법연구
  13. 이기수, "사외이사제도의 강화를 둘러싼 쟁점", 상사법연구, 19(33) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  14. 이대희, "사외이사의 역할에 대한 경험적인 연구의 고찰-미국에서의 논의를 중심으로", 상사법연구, 16(2) (1997), 한국상사법학회
  15. 은행권 사외이사제도 개선방안, "이병윤", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2009)
  16. 이시연, "미국금융개혁법의 지배구조 관련 조항과 보완과제", 주간 금융브리프, 19(37) (2010), 한국금융연구원
  17. 사외이사 선임제도 개선방안에 관한 연구, "이형규", 한국상장회사협의회, ~, pp.상장협 연구보고서 2002-3 (2002)
  18. 임중호, "사외이사제도의 정착을 위한 선결과제", 상장 (2000), 한국상장회사협의회
  19. 전삼현, "사외이사와 감사위원회 제도의 활성화 방안", 상장 (2003), 한국상장회사협의회
  20. 정쾌영, "사외이사제도의 문제점과 개선방향", 기업법연구, 19(2), pp.55~82 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  21. 최완진, "사외이사제도에 관한 재검토", 기업법연구, 5 (2000), 한국기업법학회
  22. Laura Lin, "The Effectiveness of Outside Directors as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Theories and Evidence", Northwestern U.L.R, 90(3) (1996)
  23. Melvin Aron Eisenberg, "An Overview of Principles of Corporate Governance", The Bus. Law, 48, pp.1271~ (1993)
  24. "A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities, UK", ~ (2009)
  25. Corporate Governance and the Financial Crisis: Key Findings and Main Messages, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2009)
  26. "Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Project Act, USA", ~ (2010)
  27. "FSF Principles for Sound Compensation Practices, FSF", ~ (2009)
  28. "FSF Principles for Sound Compensation Practices: Implementation Standards, FSF", ~ (2009)
  29. "OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD", ~ (2004)
  30. "Principles for Enhancing Corporate Governance, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision", ~ (2010)
  31. "Prudential Standard APS 510 Governance, APRA", ~ (2006)
  32. "Prudential Standard GPS 510 Governance, APRA", ~ (2006)
  33. Thematic Review on Compensation: Peer Review Report, "FSB", FSB, ~ (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)