본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 상장 민영기업의 정치관련성이 기업투자에 미친 영향: ‘국민진퇴’의 국가전략을 중심으로

Political connections and Privatized enterprises investment: Evidence from China

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

중국의 민영기업은 과연 공정한 경영활동이 가능한가? 중국의 시장경제는 정보공개나 금융개방 측면에서 세계에서 가장 불공정하다는 비난을 받고 있으며, 국유기업의 지나친 투자로 민영기업의 기회가 부족한 실정이다. 실제로 중국 정부는 2011년부터 국유기업 확장 정책인 ‘국진민퇴(國進民退)’ 국가전략을 본격화하면서 ‘재국유화’ 논쟁이 제기되기 시작하였다. 이러한 맥락에서 본 연구는 민영기업의 정치관련성이 기업투자에 미친 영향과, ‘국진민퇴’ 국가전략이 정경유착에 의한 민영기업 투자 혜택에 미친 영향을 2008년~2017년까지 상장 민영기업 패널 데이터를 중심으로 실증분석하였다. 분석결과 민영기업의 정치관련성이 유의미한 수준에서 기업투자를 높여 주었는데 민영기업이 정부와의 밀접한 관계를 맺을수록 투자 혜택을 받고 있었다. 한편 ‘국진민퇴’ 국가전략과 정치관련성 교차항 변수는 유의미한 수준에서 기업투자에 부정적인 영향을 미쳤는데 정치관련성에 의한 민영기업의 투자 혜택이 줄어들었다.

Abstract

This study empirically analyzes the effects of political connectedness on corporate activities investment of privatized enterprises. In addition, also looks into how the policy of 'guojinmintui' ("the state enterprises advance, the privatized sectors retreat”) moderate preferential treatment given to enterprises based on their political connectedness. The empirical analysis applied random-effects and pooled OLS models to panel data of listed privatized enterprises from 2008 to 2017 and the following conclusions were drawn. Analyses find that the political connectedness substantially increased corporate investment, indicating that privatized enterprises also benefit from political relationships. Further, political appointment of city secretary was found to lead to contraction of investment in privatized enterprises. This indicates that privatized companies, lacking the same level vertical integration in the provincial and central government’s policy considerations, are more vulnerable to political uncertainties arising from city secretary’s replacement. Moreover, the policy of advancing state-owned enterprises was found to reduce privatized enterprises’ investment benefits due to their political connectedness.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Adhikari, A., "Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates : Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5), pp.574~595 (2006)
  2. Backman, M., "Asian eclipse: Exposing the dark side of business in Asia" (2001), Wiley
  3. Beck, P. J., "A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets", Economics letters, 20(1), pp.1~5 (1986)
  4. Charumilind, C., "Connected lending : Thailand before the financial crisis", The Journal of Business, 79(1), pp.181~218 (2006)
  5. Political Connections and Investment Efficiency:Evidence from SOEs and Private Enterprises in China, "Chen, S.", CFRN, ~ (2009)
  6. Chen, Y., "Political Uncertainty and Firms’ Information Environment: Evidence from China", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(1), pp.39~64 (2018)
  7. Faccio, M., "Politically connected firms", American Economic Review, 96(1), pp.369~386 (2006)
  8. Huang Shaoqing, "Anti-Corruption, Transformation of Government-Business Relationships and Firm Performance", Academic Monthly, 50(12), pp.25~40 (2018)
  9. Jin, L., "R2 around the world : New theory and new tests", Journal of financial Economics, 79(2), pp.257~292 (2006)
  10. Julio, B., "Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles", The Journal of Finance, 67(1), pp.45~83 (2012)
  11. Khwaja, A. I., "Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), pp.1371~1411 (2005)
  12. Morck, R., "The information content of stock markets : Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements", Journal of financial Economics, 58(1), pp.215~260 (2000)
  13. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have, "Myers, S. C.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.No. w1396 (1984)
  14. Ostrom, E., "Handbook of new institutional economics", pp.819~848 (2005), Springer
  15. PIAO LONG, "Political Uncertainty and Its Effects on Local Fixed-Asset Investments in China: Static and Dynamic Panel Data Analysis", 현대중국연구, 20(4), pp.159~198 (2019), 현대중국학회[DOI]
  16. Piao Long, "Do Political Connectedness and Political Patronage Affect Corporate Performance of China’s Listed State-Owned and Privatized Enterprises?", PhD, pp.2019
  17. Piotroski, J. D., "Capitalizing China", pp.201~242 (2012), University of Chicago Press
  18. Piotroski, J. D., "Political incentives to suppress negative information : Evidence from Chinese listed firms", Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), pp.405~459 (2015)
  19. Tiebout, C. M., "A pure theory of local expenditures", Journal of political economy, 64(5), pp.416~424 (1956)
  20. Rock, M. T., "The comparative politics of corruption : accounting for the East Asian paradox in empirical studies of corruption, growth and investment", World Development, 32(6), pp.999~1017 (2004)
  21. Wooldridge, J. M., "Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach" (2013), South-Western College Pub
  22. Zhan, X., "Understanding the implications of government ties for nonprofit operations and functions", Public Administration Review, 76(4), pp.589~600 (2016)
  23. Zhong Qinlin, "Anti~corruption, Firm Performance and Channel Effects : Based on Anti~corruption Campaign of 18th CPC National Congress", Journal of Financial Research, 435(9), pp.161~176 (2016)
  24. Zhou, Z., "Government ownership and exposure to political uncertainty : Evidence from China", Journal of Banking & Finance, 84, pp.152~165 (2017)
  25. 曹春方, "财政压力, 晋升压力, 官员任期与地方国企过度投资", 经济学(季刊), 4, pp.1415~1436 (2014)
  26. 邓建平, "政治关联能改善民营企业的经营绩效吗", 中国工业经济, 2(98), pp.108~ (2009)
  27. 黄少卿, "反腐败, 政商关系转型与企业绩效", 学术月刊, 50, pp.12~ (2018)
  28. 黄速建, "中国国有企业混合所有制改革研究", 经济管理, (7), pp.1~10 (2014)
  29. 金圣程, "金融创新视野下中小企业融资难的解决途径探究", 中国市场, (23), pp.99~ (2018)
  30. 雷光勇, "主政官员更替, 不确定性与外资利用", 经济与管理研究, 38(3), pp.24~35 (2017)
  31. 李文海, "我国企业集团兼并重组中的政府行为研究", 统计研究, 24(6), pp.3~8 (2007)
  32. 刘骏, "财政集权, 政府控制与企业税负", 会计研究, 1, pp.21~27 (2014)
  33. 刘群, "我国中小企业融资难之现状与对策分析", 金融纵横, (5), pp.43~46 (2005)
  34. 罗必良, "分税制, 财政压力与政府 “土地财政” 偏好", 学术研究, 10, pp.27~35 (2010)
  35. 罗冲, "打破银行垄断对我国金融业的短期和长期的影响", 时代金融, 21, pp.130~ (2013)
  36. 吕劲松, "关于中小企业融资难, 融资贵问题的思考", 金融研究, (11), pp.115~123 (2015)
  37. 孙秀林, "土地财政与分税制 : 一个实证解释 Land Finance and the Tax-Sharing System : An Empirical Explanation", 中国社会科学, 4, pp.41~60 (2013)
  38. 汤吉军, "沉淀投资, 资产重组与企业所有权配置——兼论大型国企为什么不能简单私有化", 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2007 (2015)
  39. 王国兵, "国有企业内部人控制与国有资产流失 : 一个合谋的视角", 江漢論壇, 2007(4), pp.35~38 (2007)
  40. 王雍君, "中国的财政均等化与转移支付体制改革", 中央财经大学学报, (09) (2006)
  41. 吴文锋, "中国民营上市公司高管的政府背景与公司价值", 经济研究, 7, pp.130~141 (2008)
  42. 邢乐成, "中小企业融资难的困境与出路", 济南大学学报: 社会科学版, (2), pp.1~7 (2013)
  43. 徐业坤, "政治不确定性, 政治关联与民营企业投资——来自市委书记更替的证据", 管理世界, (5), pp.116~130 (2013)
  44. 杨超, "政治关系, 反腐败与土地出让价格——基于微观土地交易数据的实证研究", 经济评论, (2), pp.140~153 (2019)
  45. 杨卫东, "国企改革与“再国有化”反思", 华中师范大学学报: 人文社会科学版, (1), pp.23~37 (2013)
  46. 姚耀军, "中小银行发展与中小企业融资约束——新结构经济学最优金融结构理论视角下的经验研究", 财经研究, 40(1), pp.105~115 (2014)
  47. 余汉, "国有股权, 政治关联与公司绩效——基于中国民营控股上市公司的实证研究", 管理评论, 29(4), pp.196~212 (2017)
  48. 张晏, "分税制改革、 财政分权与中国经济增长", 经济学(季刊), 5(1), pp.75~108 (2005)
  49. 周飞舟, "大兴土木: 土地财政与地方政府行为", 经济社会体制比较, 3, pp.77~89 (2010)
  50. 宗寒, "正确认识国有经济的地位和作用——与袁志刚, 邵挺商榷", 邵挺商榷. 学术月刊, 8, pp.74~82 (2010)
  51. PIAO LONG, "중국 상장 국유기업의 정치관련성이 기업성과에 미친 영향: 시진핑 정부의 반부패 정책효과를 중심으로", 행정논총, 58(3), pp.153~174 (2020), 한국행정연구소
  52. PIAO LONG, "정치적 요인이 중국 상장 국유기업 세금부담에 미친 영향 연구", 현대중국연구, 22(2), pp.111~141 (2020), 현대중국학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)