본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정부 혁신의 방향과 범위 분석

Exploring the direction and scope of government innovation

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

정부는 환경변화에 대응하고 새로운 사회문제를 해결하기 위하여 조직의 관리 과정과 제공하는 공공서비스에서 혁신을 추구한다. 본 연구는 우리나라의 정부 혁신이 어떤 방향과 기능을 중심으로 이루어지고 있는지 분석하였다. 먼저 미래 정부가 추구하는 상(像)으로 지능적, 민첩한, 글로벌 대응 정부의 세 가지 혁신 방향을 제시하였으며 UN의 정부기능분류를 활용하여 혁신의 기능적 범위를 분석하고자 하였다. 분석 대상으로는 행정안전부 정부혁신 1번가에 제시된 중앙 및 지방정부, 공사·공단 등 246개 기관의 514개 우수혁신사례를 활용하였다. 분석결과, 혁신 방향은 민첩한 정부와 관련한 사례가 가장 많았고, 기능은 일반 공공행정 및 사회 보호 분야에 해당하는 경우가 많았다. 본 연구는 탐색적 연구로 향후 혁신 정책의 방향과 기능 설정에 기여할 수 있으며, 혁신의 내용이 정부의 조직과정 및 공공서비스의 질 개선에 실질적으로 기여하고 있는지와 관련한 후속 연구가 필요하다.

Abstract

The government seeks innovation in both the product and management process of the organization to respond to environmental changes and to address emerging social problems. The study aims to identify the direction and scope of innovation in the Korean government. It presents an intelligent, agile, and globally-minded government as the ideal image of the future government where government innovation should be oriented towards and analyzes the functional scope of government innovation using the classification of the functions of government (COFOG) developed by the UN. The data are 514 best practices of innovation in 246 government agencies collected by the Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Government Innovation 1st Avenue. The research finding shows that in the direction of innovation, there are the most cases involving agile government, in the scope of innovation, the most cases have been made in the field of general public service and social security sectors. This study can contribute to setting the direction and function of future innovation policies, in practice. Subsequent studies are needed on whether the content of innovation contributes substantially to the improvement of the government's organizational process and quality of public services.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 2018 정부혁신 종합 추진계획, "관계부처 합동", ~ (2018)
  2. 2019 정부혁신 종합 추진계획, "관계부처 합동", ~ (2019)
  3. 문명재, "제4차 산업혁명과 초연결 지능형 미래정부", 행정포커스, pp.16~22 (2017)
  4. 서용석, "첨단기술의 발전과 미래정부의 역할과 행태", Future Horizon, 28, pp.22~25 (2016)
  5. 윤태범, "정부혁신의 맥락과 관리혁신의 논리", GRI연구논총, 11(1), pp.51~73 (2009), 재단법인 경기연구원
  6. "미래 정부역할 변화와 중앙정부 기능의 재창조"
  7. 이창원, "대한민국 정부의 미래", 한국행정학회 학술발표논문집, pp.119~152 (2016)
  8. 정성호, "정부기능별분류(COFOG)의 체계적 고찰 및 활용", 국민계정리뷰, 2016(3), pp.1~27 (2016)
  9. 정부기능분류(COFOG)의 체계적 고찰, "정성호", 한국조세재정연구원, ~ (2015)
  10. 허철행, "신관리주의 지방정부혁신의 평가와 전망", 한국정책학회보, 11(3) (2002), 한국정책학회
  11. Kim, K., "A Comparative Study on the Politics of Public Personnel Reduction in Britain, Japan, and United States", 한국행정학회 학술발표논문집, pp.111~186 (1995)
  12. Aiken, M., "The Organic Organization and Innovation", Sociology, 5(1), pp.63~82 (1971)
  13. Archibugi, D., "Innovation in Technology, Industries and Institutions: Studies in Schumpeterian Perspectives", pp.7~24 (1994), University of Michigan Press
  14. Barzelay, M., "The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue (Vol. 3)" (2001), University of California Press
  15. The Global Information Technology Report 2013: Growth and Jobs in a Hyperconnected World, "Bilbao-Osorio, B.", World Economic Forum, ~ (2013)
  16. Boyne, G. A., "Explaining the Adoption of Innovation : An Empirical Analysis of Public Management Reform", Environment and Planning C : Government and Policy, 23(3), pp.419~435 (2005)
  17. Brown, T. L., "Transaction Cost and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), pp.441~468 (2003)
  18. Buckley, W., "Sociology and Modern Systems Theory" (1967), Prentice Hall
  19. Dahlström, C., "Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), pp.577~600 (2010)
  20. Damanpour, F., "Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of “Organizational Lag”", Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), pp.392~409 (1984)
  21. Damanpour, F., "Innovation, Science, and Industrial Change: A Research Handbook", pp.38~66 (2006), Oxford University Press
  22. Dingsøyr, T., "A Decade of Agile Methodologies : Towards Explaining Agile Software Development", The Journal of Systems and Software, 85, pp.1213~1221 (2012)
  23. Downe, J., "Evaluating the Extent of Inter-organizational Learning and Change in Local Authorities through the English Beacon Council Scheme", Public Management Review, 6(4), pp.531~554 (2004)
  24. Edquist, C., "Innovation and Employment: Process versus Product Innovation" (2001), Edward Elgar Publishing
  25. Feller, I., "Innovation Processes : A Comparison in Public Schools and Other Public Sector Organizations", Knowledge, 4(2), pp.271~291 (1982)
  26. Gamble, A., "Britain in Decline: Economic Policy, Political Strategy and the British State" (1994), Macmillan International Higher Education
  27. Hood, C., "Explaining Economic Policy Reversals" (1994), Open University Press
  28. Kimberly, J. R., "Organizational Innovation : The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations", Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), pp.689~713 (1981)
  29. Innovation and Best Practice in Local Government:A Research Report, "Newman, J.", Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ~ (2000)
  30. O’Flynn, J., "From New Public Management to Public Value : Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications", Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), pp.353~366 (2007)
  31. Osborne, S. P., "Voluntary Organizations and Innovation in Public Services" (2013), Routledge
  32. O’Toole Jr, L. J., "Implementing Public Innovations in Network Settings", Administration &Society, 29(2), pp.115~138 (1997)
  33. Rittel, H. W., "Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning", Policy Sciences, 4(2), pp.155~169 (1973)
  34. Rogers, E. M., "Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation", pp.25~38 (1995), Springer
  35. Van Thiel, S., "The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector", Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), pp.267~281 (2002)
  36. Walker, R. M., "Innovation Type and Diffusion : An Empirical Analysis of Local Government", Public Administration, 84(2), pp.311~335 (2006)
  37. Walker, R. M., "An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics : Towards a Configuration Framework", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), pp.591~615 (2008)
  38. Walker, R. M., "Managing Public Services Innovation: The Experience of English Housing Associations" (2001), Policy Press
  39. Walker, R. M., "Measuring Innovation–Applying the Literaturebased Innovation Output Indicator to Public Services", Public Administration, 80(1), pp.201~214 (2002)
  40. WEF, "The Future of Government: Lessons Learned from around the World", World Economic Forum, ~ (2011)
  41. WEF, "Future of Government – Fast and Curious", World Economic Forum, ~ (2012)
  42. WEF, "Agile Governance – Reimagining Policy-making in the Fourth Industrial Revolution", World Economic Forum, ~ (2018)
  43. "비전 및 목표"[URL]
  44. "정부혁신 1번가"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)