유럽연합 공동통상정책(CCP)의 변화와 한-EU FTA 체결배경
Transition of the EU Common Commercial Policy and motive of EU-Korea FTA
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
유럽연합의 공동통상정책은 대외정책 차원에서 규범적 의제와 연계되고 동시에 경제적 이해관계의 확대라는 복합적 목적을 갖는다. 그러나 유럽연합은 2005년 이후 WTO를 통한 다자간라운드가 결렬되면서 아시아 주요 국가와 FTA를 통한 경제적 이해관계 확대라는 통상정책 본연의 목적을 강화하였다. 유럽연합은 2006년 글로벌 유럽전략을 채택하여 통상정책을 금융위기 극복과 리스본 전략의 성공적 안착을 위한 대외관계 부분의 실행조치로 고려하여 회원국과 산업계로부터 지지를 이끌어내었다. 또한 2007년 리스본조약 체결로 집행위원회의 오랜 주장이 관철되어 공동통상정책은 유럽연합의 배타적 권한으로 귀속되었다. 이외에도 리스본조약 체결로 통상정책에서 일반입법절차 적용 확대로 결과적으로 유럽의회 역시 공동의 정책결정자로 위치하게 되었다. 이와 같이 통상정책 기조변화와 정책의 초국가화를 배경으로 회원국의 대리인으로서 대외무역협상 전권을 위임받은 집행위원회는 한-EU FTA에서 유럽연합의 경제적 이해관계를 효과적으로 개진하였다.
Abstract
The Common Commercial Policy of the European Union(EU) aims to expand its economic interests, relating with the regulative issues at the external policy. However, the EU reestablished its prior strategy to expand its market after the Doha Development Round collapsed in 2005. The EU adopted the Global Europe Strategy in 2006 and pressed ahead with FTAs with the Asian emerging countries. The Strategy was an action plan to settle down the Lisbon Strategy and to restore the financial crisis, strongly supported by the Member States and industrial sectors. The Common Commercial Policy(CCP) had reverted to the exclusive competence of the EU since the Treaty of Lisbon had taken effect in 2007. Besides, the European Parliament had become to play a significant role as a co-decision maker by the application of the Ordinary Legislative Procedure(OLP) to the CCP. Against this background above the European Commission was given the rights to negotiate external trades on behalf of member states and it has effectively improved the EU’s economic interest in the Korea-EU FTA.
참고문헌 (34)
- Baccini, Leonardo, "Explaining Formation and Design of EU Trade Agreements: The Role of Transparency and Flexibility", European Union Politics, 11(2), pp.195~192 (2010)
- Bache, Ian, "Politics in the European Union" (2015), Oxford University. Press
- Economic Impact of a Potential Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Korea, "Copenhagen Economics with Joe François", European Commission, ~ (2007)
- Global Europe: An Open Door Policy for Big Business Lobbyists at DG Trade, "Corporate Europe Observatory", ~ (2008)
- Da Conceicao, Eugénia, "Who Controls Whom? Dynamics of Power Delegation and Agency Losses in EU Trade Politics", Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), pp.1107~1126 (2010)
- Elsig, Manfred, "European Union Meets South Korea:Bureaucratic Interests, Exporter Discrimination and the Negotiations of Trade Agreements", Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(3), pp.492~507 (2012)
- The EU-Korea FTA and its Implications for the Future EU Singapore FTA, "EU Centre in Singapore", ~, pp.Background Brief No. 4 (2011)
- Commission Communication Global Europe:Competing in the World, A Contribution to the EU's Growth and Jobs Strategy, "European Commission", COM, ~, pp.COM(2006) 567 (2006)
- European Commission DG Trade, "Countries and regions, Euro-Mediterranean partnership", ~ (2016)
- "European Commission DG Trade. Free trade agreements", ~ (2016)
- European Court of Justice, "Opinion of the Court of 15 November 1994(opinion 1", 94) Competence of the Community to conclude international agreements concerning services and the protection of intellectual property - Article 228 (6) of the EC Treaty, 1995
- "EU relations with the Republic of Korea (South Korea)" (2016)[URL]
- European Union, "The Lisbon Treaty: a comprehensive guide, Division of competences within the European Union", ~ (2015)
- European Union, "Trade for All: Towards a more responsible trade and investment policy", ~ (2015)
- Gstöhl, Sieglinde, "The EU's Post - Lisbon Free Trade Agreements: Commercial Interests in a Changing Constitutional Context", European Law Journal, 20(6), pp.733~748 (2014)
- A Qualitative Analysis of a Potential Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and South Korea, "Guerin, Selen Sarisoy", Centre for European Policy Studies, ~ (2007)
- Keukeleire, Stephan, "The Foreign Policy of the European Union", pp.197~221 (2014), Palgrave
- Lakatos, Csilla, "Anticipation and trade policy uncertainty: The case of the EU-Korea FTA", Work in Progress, (2) (2014)
- Laurie Buonanno, ""Trade Policy". Policies and Policy Processes of the European Union", pp.251~272 (2013), Palgrave Macmillan
- Manchin, Miriam, "The European Union Economics and Policies", pp.383~400 (2011), University Press
- Meunier, Sophie, "International Relations and the European Union", pp.275~298 (2011), Oxford University. Press
- Nello, Susan Senior, "The European Uinon Economics, Policies and History", pp.386~413 (2012), McGraw-Hill Higher Education
- Niemann, Arne, "Explaining Decisios in the European Union", pp.114~186 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Pollack, Mark A, "Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community", International Organization, 51(1), pp.99~134 (1997)
- The European Parliament’s New Role in Trade Policy: Turning power into impact, "Putte, Lore Van den", CEPS, ~, pp.CEPS Special Report. No. 89 (2014)
- Baldwin, Richard, "The Economics of European Integration", pp.283~296 (2015), McGraw-Hill Education
- Siles-Brüugge, Gabriel, "Resisting Protectionism after the Crisis: Strategic Economic Discourse and the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement", New Political Economy, 16(5), pp.627~653 (2011)
- Staab, Andreas, "The European Union Explained", pp.161~170 (2013), Indiana University Press
- Teasdale, Anthon, "The Penguin Companion to European Union" (2012), Penguin Books
- Tovias, Alfred, "Can the EU Anchor Policy Reform in Third Countries?: An Analysis of the Euro-Med Partnership", European Union Politics, 5(4), pp.395~418 (2004)
- Transportenvironmentorg, "Briefing on the life cycle of EU trade agreements. Legal briefing", ~ (2016)
- Wallace, Helen, "Policy-Making in the European Union" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Woolcock, Stephen, "Policy-Making in the European Union", pp.381~400 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Woolcock, Stephen, "EU Policy on Preferential Trade Agreements in the 2000s: A Reorientation towards Commercial Aims", European Law Journal, 20(6), pp.718~732 (2014)