기상청 현업 기후예측시스템(GloSea5)에서의 극한예측지수를 이용한 여름철 폭염 예측 성능 평가
An Assessment of Applicability of Heat Waves Using Extreme Forecast Index in KMA Climate Prediction System (GloSea5)
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to assess the applicability of the Extreme Forecast Index (EFI) algorithm of the ECMWF seasonal forecast system to the Global Seasonal Forecasting System version 5 (GloSea5), operational seasonal forecast system of the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA). The EFI is based on the difference between Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) curves of the model's climate data and the current ensemble forecast distribution, which is essential to diagnose the predictability in the extreme cases. To investigate its applicability, the experiment was conducted during the heat-wave cases (the year of 1994 and 2003) and compared GloSea5 hindcast data based EFI with anomaly data of ERA-Interim. The data also used to determine quantitative estimates of Probability Of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR), and spatial pattern correlation. The results showed that the area of ERA-Interim indicating above 4-degree temperature corresponded to the area of EFI 0.8 and above. POD showed high ratio (0.7 and 0.9, respectively), when ERA-Interim anomaly data were the highest (on Jul. 11, 1994 (> 5oC) and Aug. 8, 2003 (> 7oC), respectively). The spatial pattern showed a high correlation in the range of 0.5~0.9. However, the correlation decreased as the lead time increased. Furthermore, the case of Korea heat wave in 2018 was conducted using GloSea5 forecast data to validate EFI showed successful prediction for two to three weeks lead time. As a result, the EFI forecasts can be used to predict the probability that an extreme weather event of interest might occur. Overall, we expected these results to be available for extreme weather forecasting.
Abstract
This study is to assess the applicability of the Extreme Forecast Index (EFI) algorithm of the ECMWF seasonal forecast system to the Global Seasonal Forecasting System version 5 (GloSea5), operational seasonal forecast system of the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA). The EFI is based on the difference between Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) curves of the model's climate data and the current ensemble forecast distribution, which is essential to diagnose the predictability in the extreme cases. To investigate its applicability, the experiment was conducted during the heat-wave cases (the year of 1994 and 2003) and compared GloSea5 hindcast data based EFI with anomaly data of ERA-Interim. The data also used to determine quantitative estimates of Probability Of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR), and spatial pattern correlation. The results showed that the area of ERA-Interim indicating above 4-degree temperature corresponded to the area of EFI 0.8 and above. POD showed high ratio (0.7 and 0.9, respectively), when ERA-Interim anomaly data were the highest (on Jul. 11, 1994 (> 5oC) and Aug. 8, 2003 (> 7oC), respectively). The spatial pattern showed a high correlation in the range of 0.5~0.9. However, the correlation decreased as the lead time increased. Furthermore, the case of Korea heat wave in 2018 was conducted using GloSea5 forecast data to validate EFI showed successful prediction for two to three weeks lead time. As a result, the EFI forecasts can be used to predict the probability that an extreme weather event of interest might occur. Overall, we expected these results to be available for extreme weather forecasting.
참고문헌 (31)
- Peter Bauer, "The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction", Nature, 525(7567), pp.47~55 (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- M. J. Best, "The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes", Geoscientific Model Development, 4(3), pp.677~699 (2011), Copernicus GmbH[DOI]
- Bowler, N. E., "The local ETKF and SKEB:Upgrades to the MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system", Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 135, pp.767~776 (2009)
- Andrew Brown, "Unified Modeling and Prediction of Weather and Climate: A 25-Year Journey", Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(12), pp.1865~1877 (2012), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
- D. P. Dee, "The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656), pp.553~597 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
- E. Dutra, "The extreme forecast index at the seasonal scale", Atmospheric Science Letters, 14(4), pp.256~262 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
- Elsner, J. B., "Assessing forecast skill through cross validation", Wea. Forecasting, 9, pp.619~624 (1994)
- Hong Guan, "Development of Verification Methodology for Extreme Weather Forecasts", Weather and Forecasting, 32(2), pp.479~491 (2017), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
- 함현준, "고해상도 장기예측시스템의 주별 앙상블 예측자료 성능 평가", 대기, 27(3), pp.261~276 (2017), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- Hamill, T. M., "NOAA’s second-generation global medium-range ensemble reforecast dataset", Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 94, pp.1553~1565 (2013)[DOI]
- Hamill, T. M., "A recommended reforecast configuration for the NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System", pp.24~ (2014), NOAA
- CICE: The Los Alamos sea ice model documentation and software user’s manual, Version 4.1, "Hunke, E. C.", Los Alamos National Laboratory, 76~, pp.LA-CC-06-012 Technical report (2010)
- Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "IPCC", IPCC, 151~ (2014)
- ICPO, "Data and bias correction for decadal climate predictions, International CLIVAR Project Office", pp.3~ (2011)
- F. Lalaurette, "Early detection of abnormal weather conditions using a probabilistic extreme forecast index", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 129(594), pp.3037~3057 (2003), Wiley[DOI]
- David A. Lavers, "ECMWF Extreme Forecast Index for water vapor transport: A forecast tool for atmospheric rivers and extreme precipitation", Geophysical Research Letters, 43(22), pp.11,852~11,858 (2016), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
- David A. Lavers, "An Assessment of the ECMWF Extreme Forecast Index for Water Vapor Transport during Boreal Winter", Weather and Forecasting, 32(4), pp.1667~1674 (2017), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
- Lea, D. J., "Assessing a new coupled data assimilation system based on the Met Office coupled atmosphere-land-ocean-sea ice model", Mon. Wea. Rev, 143, pp.4678~4694 (2015)[DOI]
- Lee, S. -W., "Probabilistic early warnings of severe weather by using the EFI from KMA Ensemble Prediction System", Proc. Abstract, KMS Spring Meeting, pp.16~17 (2013), Korean Meteorological Society
- Jeon, E. -H., "EFI analysis of KMA Ensemble Prediction System", Proc. Abstract, KMS Fall Meeting, pp.256~257 (2006), Korean Meteorological Society
- C. MacLachlan, "Global Seasonal forecast system version 5 (GloSea5): a high-resolution seasonal forecast system", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 141(689), pp.1072~1084 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
- NEMO ocean engine, "Madec, G.", Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, 300~, pp.Note du Pôle de Modélisation No. 27 (2008)
- Mason, I., "A model for assessment of weather forecasts", Aust. Meteor. Mag, 30, pp.291~303 (1982)
- Persson, A., "User Guide to ECMWF forecast products", ECMWF, 129~ (2015)
- Roebber, P. J., "Visualizing multiple measures of forecast quality", Wea. Forecasting, 24, pp.601~608 (2009)
- Taylor, K. E., "Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram", J. Geophys. Res, 106, pp.7183~7192 (2001)
- S. Valcke, "The OASIS3 coupler: a European climate modelling community software", Geoscientific Model Development, 6(2), pp.373~388 (2013), Copernicus GmbH[DOI]
- D. N. Walters, "The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 3.0", 3.1 and JULES Global Land 3.0, Geoscientific Model Development, pp.2011, 4(4)[DOI]
- Wilks, D. S., "Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences: Forecast verification", pp.704~ (1995), Academic Press
- "NAEFS mean, spread and probability forecasts" (2007)[URL]
- Zsoter, E., "Recent developments in extreme weather forecasting", ECMWF Newsletter, 107, pp.8~17 (2006)[DOI]