본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea6) 과거기후 예측장의앙상블 확대와 초기시간 변화에 따른 예측 특성 분석

Assessment of the Prediction Derived from Larger Ensemble Size and Different Initial Dates in GloSea6 Hindcast

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류대기과학

초록

In this paper, the evaluation of the performance of Korea Meteorological Administratio(KMA) Global Seasonal forecasting system version 6 (GloSea6) is presented by assessingthe effects of larger ensemble size and carrying out the test using different initial conditionsfor hindcast in sub-seasonal to seasonal scales. The number of ensemble members increasesfrom 3 to 7. The Ratio of Predictable Components (RPC) approaches the appropriate signalmagnitude with increase of ensemble size. The improvement of annual variability is shown forall basic variables mainly in mid-high latitude. Over the East Asia region, there are enhancementsespecially in 500 hPa geopotential height and 850 hPa wind fields. It reveals possibilityto improve the performance of East Asian monsoon. Also, the reliability tends to become betteras the ensemble size increases in summer than winter. To assess the effects of using differentinitial conditions, the area-mean values of normalized bias and correlation coefficients are comparedfor each basic variable for hindcast according to the four initial dates. The results havebetter performance when the initial date closest to the forecasting time is used in summer. Onthe seasonal scale, it is better to use four initial dates, where the maximum size of the ensembleincreases to 672, mainly in winter. As the use of larger ensemble size, therefore, it is mostefficient to use two initial dates for 60-days prediction and four initial dates for 6-months prediction,similar to the current Time-Lagged ensemble method.

Abstract

In this paper, the evaluation of the performance of Korea Meteorological Administratio(KMA) Global Seasonal forecasting system version 6 (GloSea6) is presented by assessingthe effects of larger ensemble size and carrying out the test using different initial conditionsfor hindcast in sub-seasonal to seasonal scales. The number of ensemble members increasesfrom 3 to 7. The Ratio of Predictable Components (RPC) approaches the appropriate signalmagnitude with increase of ensemble size. The improvement of annual variability is shown forall basic variables mainly in mid-high latitude. Over the East Asia region, there are enhancementsespecially in 500 hPa geopotential height and 850 hPa wind fields. It reveals possibilityto improve the performance of East Asian monsoon. Also, the reliability tends to become betteras the ensemble size increases in summer than winter. To assess the effects of using differentinitial conditions, the area-mean values of normalized bias and correlation coefficients are comparedfor each basic variable for hindcast according to the four initial dates. The results havebetter performance when the initial date closest to the forecasting time is used in summer. Onthe seasonal scale, it is better to use four initial dates, where the maximum size of the ensembleincreases to 672, mainly in winter. As the use of larger ensemble size, therefore, it is mostefficient to use two initial dates for 60-days prediction and four initial dates for 6-months prediction,similar to the current Time-Lagged ensemble method.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Robert Adler, "The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation", Atmosphere, 9(4), pp.138~ (2018), MDPI AG[DOI]
  2. Buizza, R., "The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation", J. Atmos. Sci, 52, pp.1434~1456 (1995)
  3. Buizza, R., "Impact of ensemble size on en-semble prediction", Mon. Wea. Rev, 126, pp.2503~2518 (1998)
  4. D. P. Dee, "The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656), pp.553~597 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
  5. Nick Dunstone, "Skilful interannual climate prediction from two large initialised model ensembles", Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), pp.094083~ (2020), IOP Publishing[DOI]
  6. Rosie Eade, "Do seasonal-to-decadal climate predictions underestimate the predictability of the real world?", Geophysical Research Letters, 41(15), pp.5620~5628 (2014), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  7. 현유경, "현 기후예측시스템에서의 기온과 강수 계절 확률 예측 신뢰도 평가", 대기, 30(2), pp.141~154 (2020), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  8. 현유경, "기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea6) - Part 2: 기후모의 평균 오차 특성 분석", 대기, 32(2), pp.87~101 (2022), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  9. 김혜리, "기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea6) - Part 1: 운영 체계 및 개선 사항", 대기, 31(3), pp.341~359 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  10. 김지영, "Global Coupled (GC) 모델 개선에 따른 동아시아 여름 몬순 모의성능 평가", 대기, 31(5), pp.563~576 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  11. Kumar, A., "Analysis of a con-ceptual model of seasonal climate variability and im-plications for seasonal prediction", Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc, 81, pp.255~264 (2000)
  12. Kumar, A., "Seasonal predictions, probabilistic verifications, and ensemble size", J. Clim, 14, pp.1671~1676 (2001)
  13. Mullen, S. L., "The impact of horizontal resolution and ensemble size on probabilistic fore-casts of precipitation by the ECMWF ensemble pre-diction system", Wea. Forecasting, 17, pp.173~191 (2002)
  14. Palmer, T. N., "Development of a European multimodel ensemble system for season-al-to-interannual prediction(DEMETER)", Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc, 85, pp.853~872 (2004)
  15. 박연희, "기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea5)의 과거기후장 앙상블 확대에 따른 예측성능 평가", 대기, 31(5), pp.511~523 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  16. Rayner, N. A., "Global analyses of sea surface temper-ature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century", J. Geophys. Res, 108, pp.4407~ (2003)
  17. Claudio Sanchez, "Improved stochastic physics schemes for global weather and climate models", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 142(694), pp.147~159 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
  18. A. A. Scaife, "Skillful long‐range prediction of European and North American winters", Geophysical Research Letters, 41(7), pp.2514~2519 (2014), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
  19. D. M. Smith, "North Atlantic climate far more predictable than models imply", Nature, 583(7818), pp.796~800 (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  20. Steven Tracton, M., "Operational en-semble prediction at the National Meteorological Center : practical aspects", Wea. Forecasting, 8, pp.379~398 (1993)
  21. Warren J. Tennant, "Using a Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter Scheme to Improve MOGREPS Probabilistic Forecast Skill", Monthly Weather Review, 139(4), pp.1190~1206 (2011), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
  22. Frédéric Vitart, "Lagged ensembles in sub‐seasonal predictions", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 147(739), pp.3227~3242 (2021), Wiley[DOI]
  23. A. Weisheimer, "On the reliability of seasonal climate forecasts", Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(96), pp.20131162~ (2014), The Royal Society[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)