현 기후예측시스템에서의 기온과 강수 계절 확률 예측 신뢰도 평가
Reliability Assessment of Temperature and Precipitation Seasonal Probability in Current Climate Prediction Systems
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Seasonal forecast is growing in demand, as it provides valuable information for decision making and potential to reduce impact on weather events. This study examines how operational climate prediction systems can be reliable, producing the probability forecast in seasonal scale. A reliability diagram was used, which is a tool for the reliability by comparing probabilities with the corresponding observed frequency. It is proposed for a method grading scales of 1- 5 based on the reliability diagram to quantify the reliability. Probabilities are derived from ensemble members using hindcast data. The analysis is focused on skill for 2 m temperature and precipitation from climate prediction systems in KMA, UKMO, and ECMWF, NCEP and JMA. Five categorizations are found depending on variables, seasons and regions. The probability forecast for 2 m temperature can be relied on while that for precipitation is reliable only in few regions. The probabilistic skill in KMA and UKMO is comparable with ECMWF, and the reliabilities tend to increase as the ensemble size and hindcast period increasing.
Abstract
Seasonal forecast is growing in demand, as it provides valuable information for decision making and potential to reduce impact on weather events. This study examines how operational climate prediction systems can be reliable, producing the probability forecast in seasonal scale. A reliability diagram was used, which is a tool for the reliability by comparing probabilities with the corresponding observed frequency. It is proposed for a method grading scales of 1- 5 based on the reliability diagram to quantify the reliability. Probabilities are derived from ensemble members using hindcast data. The analysis is focused on skill for 2 m temperature and precipitation from climate prediction systems in KMA, UKMO, and ECMWF, NCEP and JMA. Five categorizations are found depending on variables, seasons and regions. The probability forecast for 2 m temperature can be relied on while that for precipitation is reliable only in few regions. The probabilistic skill in KMA and UKMO is comparable with ECMWF, and the reliabilities tend to increase as the ensemble size and hindcast period increasing.
참고문헌 (26)
- Giorgi, F., "Uncertainties in regional climate change prediction : a regional analysis of ensemble simulations with the HADCM2 coupled AOGCM", Climate Dyn, 16, pp.169~182 (2000)
- 함현준, "고해상도 장기예측시스템의 주별 앙상블 예측자료 성능 평가", 대기, 27(3), pp.261~276 (2017), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- 함현준, "기상청 기후예측시스템 개선에 따른 월별 앙상블 예측자료 성능평가", 대기, 29(2), pp.149~164 (2019), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- 허솔잎, "기상청 현업 기후예측시스템(GloSea5)에서의 극한예측지수를 이용한 여름철 폭염 예측 성능 평가", 대기, 29(3), pp.257~267 (2019), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- 정명일, "GloSea5 모형의 6개월 장기 기후 예측성 검증", 대기, 25(2), pp.323~337 (2015), 한국기상학회
- 정명일, "GloSea5 모형의 성층권 예측성 검증", 대기, 26(1), pp.203~214 (2016), 한국기상학회
- Kim, H., "Representation of boreal winter MJO and its teleconnection in a dynamical ensemble seasonal prediction system", J. Climate, 31, pp.8803~8818 (2018)[DOI]
- 김혜라, "성층권 극소용돌이 강화사례에 대한 GloSea5의 예측성 진단", 한국지구과학회지, 39(3), pp.211~227 (2018), 한국지구과학회[DOI]
- Kim, H. -M., "Seasonal prediction skill of ECMWF system 4 and NCEP CFSv2 retrospective forecast for the northern hemisphere winter", Climate Dyn, 23, pp.2957~2973 (2012)[DOI]
- 김상욱, "GloSea5 모형의 계절내-계절(S2S) 예측성 검정: Part 1. 북반구 중위도 지위고도", 대기, 28(3), pp.233~245 (2018), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- 이효미, "고해상도 기후예측시스템의 표층해류 예측성능 평가", Ocean and Polar Research, 40(3), pp.99~114 (2018), 한국해양과학기술원
- 이강진, "원격상관을 이용한 북동아시아 여름철 강수량 예측", 대기, 25(1), pp.179~183 (2015), 한국기상학회
- 이상민, "2014년 계절예측시스템과 중기예측모델의 예측성능 비교 및 검증", 대기, 26(1), pp.59~72 (2016), 한국기상학회
- 임소민, "GloSea5의 과거기후 모의자료에서 나타난 El Niño와 관련된 동아시아 강수 및 기온 예측성능", 대기, 28(1), pp.37~51 (2018), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- MacLachlan, C., "Global Seasonal Forecast System version 5 (GloSea5): a high-resolution seasonal forecast system", Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 141, pp.1072~1084 (2015)[DOI]
- The new ECMWF seasonal forecast system (System4), "Molteni, F.", 49~, pp.ECMWF Tech. Memo. No. 656 (2011)
- 문수진, "GloSea5 모델의 자료처리 시스템 구축 및 시․공간적 재현성평가", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 49(9), pp.761~771 (2016), 한국수자원학회
- 박진경, "S2S 멀티 모델 앙상블을 이용한 북극 해빙 면적의 예측성", 대기, 28(1), pp.15~24 (2018), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- 박상욱, "Comparison of Extended Medium-Range Forecast Skill Between KMA Ensemble, Ocean Coupled Ensemble, and GloSea5", Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 53(3), pp.393~401 (2017), 한국기상학회
- Peng, P., "Ananalysis of seasonal predictability in coupled model forecasts", Climate Dyn, 36, pp.637~648 (2011)[DOI]
- Phelps, M. W., "Potential predictability in the NCEP CPC dynamical seasonal forecast system", J. Climate, 17, pp.3775~3785 (2004)[DOI]
- Saha, S., "The NCEP climate forecast system version 2", J. Climate, 27, pp.2185~2208 (2014)[DOI]
- 손경환, "수문학적 가뭄전망을 위한 GloSea5의 활용체계 구축 및 예측성 평가", 대기, 25(2), pp.271~281 (2015), 한국기상학회
- 송강현, "GloSea5 모형의 계절내-계절 예측성 검정: Part 2. 성층권 돌연승온", 대기, 28(2), pp.123~139 (2018), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- Takaya, Y., "Japan Meteorological Agency", Meteorological Research Institute-Coupled Prediction System version 2 (JMA, Climate Dyn, pp.2018, 50[DOI]
- Weisheimer, A., "On the reliability of seasonal climate forecasts", J. R. Soc. Interface, 11, pp.20131162~ (2014)[DOI]