본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기상청 기후예측시스템(GloSea5)의 과거기후장 앙상블 확대에 따른 예측성능 평가

Assessment of the Prediction Performance of Ensemble Size-Related in GloSea5 Hindcast Data

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류대기과학

초록

This study explores the optimal ensemble size to improve the prediction performance of the Korea Meteorological Administration's operational climate prediction system, global seasonal forecast system version 5 (GloSea5). The GloSea5 produces an ensemble of hindcast data using the stochastic kinetic energy backscattering version2 (SKEB2) and timelagged ensemble. An experiment to increase the hindcast ensemble from 3 to 14 members for four initial dates was performed and the improvement and effect of the prediction performance considering Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC), ensemble spread, and Ratio of Predictable Components (RPC) were evaluated. As the ensemble size increased, the RMSE and ACC prediction performance improved and more significantly in the high variability area. In spread and RPC analysis, the prediction accuracy of the system improved as the ensemble size increased. The closer the initial date, the better the predictive performance. Results show that increasing the ensemble to an appropriate number considering the combination of initial times is efficient.

Abstract

This study explores the optimal ensemble size to improve the prediction performance of the Korea Meteorological Administration's operational climate prediction system, global seasonal forecast system version 5 (GloSea5). The GloSea5 produces an ensemble of hindcast data using the stochastic kinetic energy backscattering version2 (SKEB2) and timelagged ensemble. An experiment to increase the hindcast ensemble from 3 to 14 members for four initial dates was performed and the improvement and effect of the prediction performance considering Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC), ensemble spread, and Ratio of Predictable Components (RPC) were evaluated. As the ensemble size increased, the RMSE and ACC prediction performance improved and more significantly in the high variability area. In spread and RPC analysis, the prediction accuracy of the system improved as the ensemble size increased. The closer the initial date, the better the predictive performance. Results show that increasing the ensemble to an appropriate number considering the combination of initial times is efficient.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Adler, R. F., "The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project(GPCP)monthly precipitation analysis(1979-Present)", J. Hydrometeor, 4, pp.1147~1167 (2003)
  2. 안중배, "PNU CGCM 앙상블 예보 시스템의 겨울철 남한 기온 예측 성능 평가", 대기, 28(4), pp.509~520 (2018), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  3. Baker, L. H., "An intercomparison of skill and overconfidence", underconfidence of the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation in multimodel seasonal forecasts, 2018, pp.45, 7808~7817
  4. Bowler, N. E., "The local ETKF and SKEB : Upgrades to the MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 135, pp.767~776 (2009)
  5. Branković, Č., "Extended-range predictions with ECMWF models : Time-lagged ensemble forecasting", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 116, pp.867~912 (1990)
  6. Corti, S., "Reliability of decadal predictions", Geophys. Res. Lett, 39, pp.L21712~ (2012)[DOI]
  7. Dee, D. P., "The ERA-Interim reanalysis : configuration and performance of the data assimilation system", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 137, pp.553~597 (2011)[DOI]
  8. Dunstone, N., "Skilful interannual climate prediction from two large initialised model ensembles", Environ. Res. Lett, 15, pp.094083~ (2020)[DOI]
  9. Eade R., "Do seasonal-todecadal climate predictions underestimate the predictability of the real world?", Geophys. Res. Lett, 41, pp.5620~5628 (2014)[DOI]
  10. Giorgi, F., "Uncertainties in regional climate change prediction : a regional analysis of ensemble simulations with the HADCM2 coupled AOGCM", Climate Dyn, 16, pp.169~182 (2000)
  11. Goddard, L., "A verification framework for interannual-to-decadal predictions experiments", Climate Dyn, 40, pp.245~272 (2012)[DOI]
  12. 현유경, "현 기후예측시스템에서의 기온과 강수 계절 확률 예측 신뢰도 평가", 대기, 30(2), pp.141~154 (2020), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  13. Kim, S. -W., "Optimal ensemble size for Sub-seasonal to Seasonal (S2S) prediction system", M. S, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, pp.2019
  14. Kumar, A., "Seasonal predictions, probabilistic verifications, and ensemble size", J. Climate, 14, pp.1671~1676 (2001)
  15. MacLachlan, C., "Global Seasonal Forecast System version 5(GloSea5) : a high-resolution seasonal forecast system", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 141, pp.1072~1084 (2015)[DOI]
  16. Murphy, J. M., "Assessment of the practical utility of extended range ensemble forecasts", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 116, pp.89~125 (1988)
  17. Müller, W. A., "A debiased ranked probability skill score to evaluate probabilistic ensemble forecasts with small ensemble sizes", J. Climate, 18, pp.1513~1523 (2005)
  18. Palmer, T., "Ensemble prediction : a pedagogical perspective", ECMWF Newsletter, 106, pp.10~17 (2006)[DOI]
  19. Raynaud, L., "The impact of horizontal resolution and ensemble size for convective-scale probabilistic forecasts", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 143, pp.3037~3047 (2017)[DOI]
  20. Richardson, D. S., "Measures of skill and value of ensemble prediction systems, their interrelationship and the effect of ensemble size", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 127, pp.2473~2489 (2001)
  21. Rodwell, M. J., "Mediumrange, monthly, and seasonal prediction for Europe and the use of forecast information", J. Climate, 19, pp.6025~6046 (2006)
  22. Scaife, A. A., "Skillful long-range prediction of European and North American winters", Geophys. Res. Lett, 41, pp.2514~2519 (2014)[DOI]
  23. Smith, D. M., "North Atlantic climate far more predictable than models imply", Nature, 583, pp.796~800 (2020)[DOI]
  24. Strommen, K., "Signal and noise in regime systems : A hypothesis on the predictability of the North Atlantic Oscillation", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 145, pp.147~163 (2019)[DOI]
  25. Talagrand, O., "Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems", Proc., Workshop on Predictability, pp.1~25 (1997), ECMWF
  26. Vitart, F., "Madden-Julian Oscillation prediction and teleconnections in the S2S database", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 143, pp.2210~2220 (2017)[DOI]
  27. Williams, R. M., "A comparison of ensemble post-processing methods for extreme events", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 140, pp.1112~1120 (2013)[DOI]
  28. Weisheimer, A., "How confident are predictability estimates of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation?", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 145, pp.140~159 (2019)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)