근대적 주체와 ‘거절’의 논리, 그리고 대타자의 위상
The Logic of Modern Subject and ‘Die Versagung’ and The Status of big Other
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the changing position of big Other by the three Fathers' shape in Freud's works. The changing position of big Other becomes the foundation of understanding the modern subject. And it also reveals that the big Other(symbolic order)is associated with an act of subject. In order to develop the argument, I explain the different Father's shape in Oedipus complex and Totem and Taboo in chapter 2 and Moses and Monotheism in chapter 3. Also, I look at how can the experience on Jewish and Christian become the cornerstone illustrating the logic of ‘Die Versagung’ of modern subject. This shows the difference between antique tragedy and tragedy of the modern as well as reveals that the tragedy is no longer possible in modern society. By examining Freud's trilogy, we can learn the way the conception of big Other is made by through ‘the precipitate identification’ of the subject. This can provide an opportunity to enable us to redefine the conception of big other Lacan accounts for.
Abstract
This paper examines the changing position of big Other by the three Fathers' shape in Freud's works. The changing position of big Other becomes the foundation of understanding the modern subject. And it also reveals that the big Other(symbolic order)is associated with an act of subject. In order to develop the argument, I explain the different Father's shape in Oedipus complex and Totem and Taboo in chapter 2 and Moses and Monotheism in chapter 3. Also, I look at how can the experience on Jewish and Christian become the cornerstone illustrating the logic of ‘Die Versagung’ of modern subject. This shows the difference between antique tragedy and tragedy of the modern as well as reveals that the tragedy is no longer possible in modern society. By examining Freud's trilogy, we can learn the way the conception of big Other is made by through ‘the precipitate identification’ of the subject. This can provide an opportunity to enable us to redefine the conception of big other Lacan accounts for.
참고문헌 (16)
- 이성민, "실재의 윤리" (2004), b
- 임한순, "브레히트 선집" (2011), 연극과인간
- G.W.F. 헤겔, "헤겔 예나 시기 정신철학" (2006), 이제이북스
- J. 라캉, "정신분석의 네 가지 근본 개념" (2008), 새물결
- 이성민, "사랑과 증오의 도착들" (2003), b
- S. 프로이트, "종교의 기원" (2011), 열린책들
- S. 지젝, "당신의 징후를 즐겨라" (1997), 한나래
- 이성민, "이라크" (2004), b
- 이성민, "까다로운 주체" (2005), b
- 이성민, "부정적인 것과 함께 머물기" (2007), b
- S. 지젝, "죽은 신을 위하여" (2007), 길
- S. 지젝, "전체주의가 어쨌다구" (2008), 새물결
- S. 지젝, "지젝이 만난 레닌" (2008), 교양인
- 김서영, "시차적 관점" (2009), 마티
- S. 지젝, "나눌 수 없는 잔여" (2010), 도서출판b
- S. 지젝, "사랑의 대상으로서의 시선과 목소리" (2010), 인간사랑