라캉의 주이상스 주체로 본 소포클레스의 <안티고네>
A study on the subject of Jouissance in Lacan's interpretation of Antigone
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at knowing how the subject of jouissance are embodied in Antigone based on Lacan's interpretation of Antigone. First of all, in order to explain Antigone as the subject of jouissance, the subject of drive, this paper examines into process of alienation and separation in subjectivization. The subject tries to recover alienated being through active separation, and the subject of jouissance can escape from metonymy of repetitive desire. In other words, the subject faced on the Other's lack practices the signifying cut with passing through the fantasy. In Lacan's innovative reading of Antigone under the relationship of unconscious and language, Lacan deconstructs Aristotle's term, tragedy. And he emphasizes that Sophocles portrays Creon quite simply as an ordinary human being. The ordinary human error of judgment, that is hamartia, cannot provide the impetus for the kathartic effect of tragedy. Thus hamartia is applicable solely to Creon, and is not, Aristotle's view notwithstanding, the central condition of tragedy. It is only Antigone herself who is the true heroine of the play. This paper shows that the separation of subject makes it possible for Antigone to reject as worthless all of Creon's arguments concerning Polyneices' criminality. Antigone's ‘raw’ words that contradict Creon's decree is developed in no ‘signifying chain’, but ‘nothing’. In effect her act is against community, thereby she is punished with symbolic death. Antigone unshakably pursues as she assumes her desire. Her desire is for ‘nothing’. This paper asserts that the word, ‘atē’ written by Sophocles and used by Lacan continuously designates metaphor of the Real. Antigone who knows the lack of the Other goes beyond atē with traversing the fantasy instead of metonymy of repetitive desire, she becomes the subject of Jouissance. After all, Lacan shows Antigone represents the subject of Jouissance. For Lacan Antigone is an ethical subject of Psychoanalysis. At a moment ‘desire is made visible’ Antigone herself becomes lost being, ‘das Ding’, and she has sublime beauty as a painful pleasure with ethical splendor and as an effect of tragedy
Abstract
This study aims at knowing how the subject of jouissance are embodied in Antigone based on Lacan's interpretation of Antigone. First of all, in order to explain Antigone as the subject of jouissance, the subject of drive, this paper examines into process of alienation and separation in subjectivization. The subject tries to recover alienated being through active separation, and the subject of jouissance can escape from metonymy of repetitive desire. In other words, the subject faced on the Other's lack practices the signifying cut with passing through the fantasy. In Lacan's innovative reading of Antigone under the relationship of unconscious and language, Lacan deconstructs Aristotle's term, tragedy. And he emphasizes that Sophocles portrays Creon quite simply as an ordinary human being. The ordinary human error of judgment, that is hamartia, cannot provide the impetus for the kathartic effect of tragedy. Thus hamartia is applicable solely to Creon, and is not, Aristotle's view notwithstanding, the central condition of tragedy. It is only Antigone herself who is the true heroine of the play. This paper shows that the separation of subject makes it possible for Antigone to reject as worthless all of Creon's arguments concerning Polyneices' criminality. Antigone's ‘raw’ words that contradict Creon's decree is developed in no ‘signifying chain’, but ‘nothing’. In effect her act is against community, thereby she is punished with symbolic death. Antigone unshakably pursues as she assumes her desire. Her desire is for ‘nothing’. This paper asserts that the word, ‘atē’ written by Sophocles and used by Lacan continuously designates metaphor of the Real. Antigone who knows the lack of the Other goes beyond atē with traversing the fantasy instead of metonymy of repetitive desire, she becomes the subject of Jouissance. After all, Lacan shows Antigone represents the subject of Jouissance. For Lacan Antigone is an ethical subject of Psychoanalysis. At a moment ‘desire is made visible’ Antigone herself becomes lost being, ‘das Ding’, and she has sublime beauty as a painful pleasure with ethical splendor and as an effect of tragedy
참고문헌 (20)
- 김석, "욕망하는 주체와 욕망하는 기계-라캉과 들뢰즈의 욕망이론-", 철학과 현상학 연구, (29), pp.173~202 (2006), 한국현상학회
- 김석, "에크리-라캉으로 이끄는 마법의 문자들" (2007), 살림
- 김석, "시니피앙 논리와 주이상스의 주체", 라깡과 현대정신분석, 9(1), pp.185~209 (2007), 한국라깡과현대정신분석학회
- 신경원, "헤겔, 데리다, 이리가레의 안티고네", 비평과이론, 11(2), pp.101~127 (2006), 한국비평이론학회
- 양석원, "욕망의 주체와 윤리적 행위", 영미문학연구, 10, pp.269~294 (2001), 영미문학연구회
- 이미선, "라캉의 욕망이론과 셰익스피어 텍스트읽기" (2006), 한국학술정보
- 조현준, "안티고네: 숭고미에서 퀴어 주체로", 라깡과 현대정신분석, 8(2), pp.181~212 (2006), 한국라깡과현대정신분석학회
- Butler, Judith, "Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death, in 안티고네의 주장" (2005), 동문선
- Fink, Bruce, "라캉과 정신의학" (2008), 민음사
- Kawsar, Mohammad, "Lacan's Antigone:A Case Study in Psychoanalytical Ethics, in Critical Theory and Performance", pp.399~412 (1992), University of Michigan Press
- Lacan, Jacques, "욕망 그리고 <햄릿>에 나타난 욕망의 해석, in 자크라캉-욕망이론", pp.135~183 (1994), 문예출판사
- Lacan, Jacques, "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis, in 자크라캉 세미나 11권- 정신분석의 네가지 근본개념" (2008), 새물결
- Lacan, Jacques, "Ecrits" (2006), Norton
- Lacan, Jacques, "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book Ⅶ: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-1960, in Jacques Allain Miller" (1960), Norton
- Lee, Jonathan Scott, "Jacques Lacan" (1990), University of Massachusetts Press
- Schneiderman, Stuart, "자크라캉, 지적 영웅의 죽음" (1997), 인간사랑
- Sophocles, "소포클레스 비극" (2005), 단국대학교출판부
- Wright, Elizabeth, "Lacan and Post-Feminism, in 라캉과 포스트페미니즘" (2002), 이제이북스
- Žižek, Slavoj, "The Sublime Object of Ideology, in 이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" (2001), 인간사랑
- Zupančič, Alenka, "실재의 윤리-칸트와 라캉" (2008), 도서출판 b
