손해방지의무와 손해방지비용에 관한 소론
A study on the duty to mitigate insured loss and the costs to mitigate the loss
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Obligation to prevent damage means the obligations of that policyholder or the insured strive for the prevention and mitigation of damages when the insurance accident occurred, and costs to avoid damages means the costs of that spending necessary and beneficial to prevent the occurrence and expansion of additional damages and mitigate damages. Our current 「Commercial Code」 Article 680 has been recognized obligations of that to prevent the spread of the damages or relief of the damages to policyholder or the insured, and has been recognized the liability to the insurer even if the sum of expenditure costs and compensation exceed the insurance amount. But these regulations did not prescribe explicitly the scope of the obligation to prevent damage and the effect of violation of the duty, and may be interpreted adversely to insurers because these regulations has been prescribe that insurer to be responsible regardless of whether the insurer's instructions. For this reason, the Department of Justice submitted the 2007 revised bill of insurance side of the 「Commercial Code」 to 17th National Assembly, but it was disposed due to term expires. Since then, the government submitted 「Commercial Code」 revised legislation to modify and supplement 「Commercial Code」 insurance side of existing, but these amendment has been deleted revised bill of the 「Commercial Code」 Article 680. But practical necessity to revised these regulations more clearly is critical. Moreover, the amendment of this provision was favored because the German Insurance Contract Act of 2009 was amended. For that reason, it has been giving considerable regret that revised bill of the 「Commercial Code」 Article 680 was deleted. Therefore, I would like to present desirable revised legislative measures after reviewing the issues of interpretation can be raised from the current 「Commercial Code」 Article 680 and look more the related statutes around the world on obligation and costs to prevent damage in this paper.
Abstract
Obligation to prevent damage means the obligations of that policyholder or the insured strive for the prevention and mitigation of damages when the insurance accident occurred, and costs to avoid damages means the costs of that spending necessary and beneficial to prevent the occurrence and expansion of additional damages and mitigate damages. Our current 「Commercial Code」 Article 680 has been recognized obligations of that to prevent the spread of the damages or relief of the damages to policyholder or the insured, and has been recognized the liability to the insurer even if the sum of expenditure costs and compensation exceed the insurance amount. But these regulations did not prescribe explicitly the scope of the obligation to prevent damage and the effect of violation of the duty, and may be interpreted adversely to insurers because these regulations has been prescribe that insurer to be responsible regardless of whether the insurer's instructions. For this reason, the Department of Justice submitted the 2007 revised bill of insurance side of the 「Commercial Code」 to 17th National Assembly, but it was disposed due to term expires. Since then, the government submitted 「Commercial Code」 revised legislation to modify and supplement 「Commercial Code」 insurance side of existing, but these amendment has been deleted revised bill of the 「Commercial Code」 Article 680. But practical necessity to revised these regulations more clearly is critical. Moreover, the amendment of this provision was favored because the German Insurance Contract Act of 2009 was amended. For that reason, it has been giving considerable regret that revised bill of the 「Commercial Code」 Article 680 was deleted. Therefore, I would like to present desirable revised legislative measures after reviewing the issues of interpretation can be raised from the current 「Commercial Code」 Article 680 and look more the related statutes around the world on obligation and costs to prevent damage in this paper.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강위두, "상법강의(하)" (2010), 형설출판사
- 김동훈, "상법개설" (2009), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2012), 홍문사
- 양승규, "보험법" (2005), 삼지원
- 이기수, "보험․해상법(상법강의 Ⅳ)" (2008), 박영사
- 이필규, "2009년 독일 보험계약법(VVG)" (2009), 세창출판사
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
- 정동윤, "상법(하)" (2011), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(하)(제14판)" (2012), 박영사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(하)(사례해설부)" (2008), 박영사
- 최준선, "보험법 해상법 항공운송법" (2012), 삼영사
- 김상준, "책임보험에 있어서의 손해방지비용 및 방어비용", 대법원 판례해설(재판연구관 세미나 자료), (40) (2002), 법원도서관
- 노영보, "교통사고의 가해운전자가 자신의 과실유무가 판명되지 않은 상태에서치료비채무를 연대보증한 경우의 법률관계", 민사판례연구, 16 (1994), 민사판례연구회
- 송흥섭, "책임보험에 있어서 ‘손해방지행위’와 ‘방어비용’의 개념", 법조, (439) (1993), 법조협회
- 장덕조, "손해방지비용에 관한 연구", 보험학회지, (76), pp.61~82 (2007), 한국보험학회
- 한창희, "손해방지의 의무과 손해방지비용의 보상", 보험학회지, (78), pp.107~128 (2007), 한국보험학회
- 水下孝治, "保險契約における情報隔差の是正と不正請求對策", 商事法務, (1808), pp.25~ (2007), 商事法務硏究會
- Arnould, "Law of Marine Insurance and Average, Vol 3(2) ∬770" (1997), Sweet & Maxwell
- Sue and Labor Provisions, "Christopher L. Troy", SPG, ~, pp.31-SPG Brief 30 (2002)
- F.D. Rose, "Marine insurance : Law and Practice, ∬20.45" (2004), LLP
- Haakon Stang Lund, "Comparative Lessons Derivable from the Norwegian Marine Insurance Plan 1996, In Marine Insurance, TheLaw in Transition" (1996), Informa
- Haward Bennett, "The Law of Marine Insurance" (2006), Oxford
- Malcolm Clarke, "Wisdom after The Event : The Duty to Mitigate Insured Loss", LMCLQ (2003)
- Robert K. Regan, "Recoverability, under property insurance or insurance against liability for property damage, of insured’s expenses toprevent or mitigate damages", A.L.R.3d, 33 (2006)
- Edgar Hofmannm, "Privatersicherungsrecnt" (1991)
- Prölss-Martin, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (1988)
- Römer, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz mit PfIVG und KfzPFIVV" (2003), C.H.Beck
