불법행위법상 위험책임 일반규정의 입법화에 관한 연구
An study of new establishment of general provisions on risk responsibility
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to present civil law, torts is applied based on the principle ofresponsibility by negligence, and thus risk responsibility is being introducedexceptionally. Risk responsibility is considered as legislative counteractionfor the victim protection needs that have grown ever in the course of hightech industrialization in the 19th through 20th century throughout the world. In such a context, new establishment of general provision for riskresponsibility was asserted in the discussion of revision of civil law in 1995. About the assertion, proponents maintained that establishment of special lawmay involve such potentials like delay of protection and backwardness ofnational consciousness on facility or risk of substance, and reliance onspecial law may increase the problem of equitability among businesses, butallow for presence of businesses that may not take advantage of thelegislation. On the contrary, opponents emphasized that no generalprovisions exist even in other countries that have many special laws on riskresponsibility. Also in the 2004 revision discussion, new establishment ofgeneral provisions on risk responsibility was discussed, but it wasdetermined that the issue shall be excluded from revision. Regarding the new establishment of general provisions of riskresponsibilities, it remains a question whether to maintain the classicalformula to approach the issue by weighing the advantages by the operationof risk facility and the disadvantages by realization of risk. Newestablishment of general provisions of risk responsibility can be supported only if the ideological changes in the responsibility of deficit indemnity fromthe past are recognized. Later on the issue of indemnity responsibility fordeficit shall not be considered content, only indemnifying the deficit uponrecognizing the fact that the deficit was caused by intention. There areclearly areas where offender may distribute the deficit of particular personsocially through taxation of indemnity amount, pricing structure or otherliability insurance etc by attributing the negligence to the offender. It ismore desirable to distribute the disadvantage by the deficit by risk facilitywith social value socially than to let a particular victim undertake suchdeficit. In such perspective, in case general provisions on risk responsibilityare newly established, the general requirements for offender's responsibilityfor risk should include provisions on the capability to distribute deficits aswell as to create risk.
Abstract
According to present civil law, torts is applied based on the principle ofresponsibility by negligence, and thus risk responsibility is being introducedexceptionally. Risk responsibility is considered as legislative counteractionfor the victim protection needs that have grown ever in the course of hightech industrialization in the 19th through 20th century throughout the world. In such a context, new establishment of general provision for riskresponsibility was asserted in the discussion of revision of civil law in 1995. About the assertion, proponents maintained that establishment of special lawmay involve such potentials like delay of protection and backwardness ofnational consciousness on facility or risk of substance, and reliance onspecial law may increase the problem of equitability among businesses, butallow for presence of businesses that may not take advantage of thelegislation. On the contrary, opponents emphasized that no generalprovisions exist even in other countries that have many special laws on riskresponsibility. Also in the 2004 revision discussion, new establishment ofgeneral provisions on risk responsibility was discussed, but it wasdetermined that the issue shall be excluded from revision. Regarding the new establishment of general provisions of riskresponsibilities, it remains a question whether to maintain the classicalformula to approach the issue by weighing the advantages by the operationof risk facility and the disadvantages by realization of risk. Newestablishment of general provisions of risk responsibility can be supported only if the ideological changes in the responsibility of deficit indemnity fromthe past are recognized. Later on the issue of indemnity responsibility fordeficit shall not be considered content, only indemnifying the deficit uponrecognizing the fact that the deficit was caused by intention. There areclearly areas where offender may distribute the deficit of particular personsocially through taxation of indemnity amount, pricing structure or otherliability insurance etc by attributing the negligence to the offender. It ismore desirable to distribute the disadvantage by the deficit by risk facilitywith social value socially than to let a particular victim undertake suchdeficit. In such perspective, in case general provisions on risk responsibilityare newly established, the general requirements for offender's responsibilityfor risk should include provisions on the capability to distribute deficits aswell as to create risk.
참고문헌 (70)
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (1985), 박영사
- 김기선, "한국채권법각론" (1976), 법문사
- 김상용, "불법행위법" (1997), 법문사
- 김증한, "신채권각론(하)" (1970), 박영사
- 김현태, "채권법각론" (1969), 일조각
- 김형배, "민법학 강의" (2014), 신조사
- 서광민, "불법행위의 귀책구조연구" (1988), 강원대학출판부
- 서광민, "민법의 기본문제" (2006), 서강대학교 출판부
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2013), 박영사
- 송덕수, "채권법각론" (2014), 박영사
- 이은영, "채권각론" (1992), 박영사
- 이태재, "채권각론신강" (1977), 진명문화사
- 전경운, "환경사법론" (2009), 집문당
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2014), 홍문사
- Koziol, "유럽손해배상법 –통일과 전망-" (2005), 법문사
- 법무부, "2004년 법무부 민법 개정안" (2012), 민속원
- 가정준, "EU 통합 불법행위법 동향", 외법논집, (23), pp.31~58 (2006), 법학연구소
- 가정준, "현대 불법행위법의 동향과 민법상 불법행위법의 문제점", 법학연구, 30, pp.43~68 (2010), 부설법학연구소
- 가정준, "불법행위법 개편의 필요성", 외법논집, (27), pp.67~86 (2007), 법학연구소
- 강구철, "프랑스의 국가배상책임에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 22(2), pp.93~132 (2010), 법학연구소
- 강대옥, "우리나라 위험책임에 관한 고찰", 법률행정논총, 80 (1994), 전남대학교 법학연구소
- 강봉석, "위험책임과 일반조항", 법학논집, 5(1), pp.71~88 (2000), 법학연구소
- 김상용, "엄격책임", 사법행정, 통권 : 325 (1988), 한국사법행정학회
- 김상중, "한국의 위험책임 현황과 입법 논의 : 유럽의 논의와 경험을 바탕으로", 민사법학, 57, pp.163~197 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 위험책임에 관한 연구, "김상중", 법무부, ~ (2011)
- 김영환, "위험사회에서의 책임구조: 자연 재해에 대한 법적 담론", 홍익법학, 14(1), pp.821~842 (2013), 법학연구소
- 김제완, "제약산업과 제조물책임연구논문", 사법, 1(2), pp.3~42 (2007), 사법발전재단
- 김형배, "위험책임의 근거와 요건", 고시연구 (1993), 고시연구사
- 김형배, "민법학의 회고와 전망 (민법전시행삼십주년기념논문집)" (1993)
- 김형배, "위험책임에 있어서의 사용자책임", 고려대학교 안암법학, (창간) (1993), 안암법학회
- 김형배, "위험책임체계와 특별법의 해석", 법학논집, 34 (1998), 고려대학교 법학연구소
- 김형배, "불법행위법개정안 의견서", 민사법학, (15) (1997), 한국민사법학회
- 명순구, "프랑스 민법상 생명 없는 물건으로 인한 민사책임-블란서 민법전 제1384조 제1항의 적용요건을 중심으로", 저스티스, 27(2) (1994), 법원도서관
- 박규용, "의약품과 의료제조물의 결함에 대한 제조사의 책임 - 불법행위책임과 위험책임의 구조를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 15(2), pp.231~260 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 박동진, "제조물책임법상 제조물의 개념", 비교사법, 10(4), pp.279~312 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 서광민, "민법의 기본문제" (2006), 서강대학교 출판부
- 서광민, "위험책임의 요건과 그 인정방법", 사법행정 (1989), 한국사법행정학회
- 申相大, "國家補償法上 危險責任法理의 導入에 관한 硏究", 박사, 공법, pp.1999
- 양창수, "민법연구 제6권" (2001), 박영사
- 연기영, "과실책임과 위험책임의 구조적 관계", 재산법연구, 3(1) (1986), 한국재산법학회
- 연기영, "위험책임법리의 기본문제", 재산법연구, 5(1) (1988), 한국재산법학회
- 윤석찬, "독일의 수자원관리법에 근거한 위험책임법리와 시사점", 물정책․경제, (17) (2011)
- 윤석찬, "불법행위책임과 위험책임에서의 책임면제 및 책임제한 이론에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 51(4), pp.105~129 (2010), 법학연구소
- 윤용석, "위험책임론", 법학연구, 31(1) (1989), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 윤용석, "서독 불법행위법상의 소위 Verkehrspflicht에 관한 고찰", 부산대학교 법학연구, 27(1) (1984)
- 윤용석, "위험책임의 새로운 경향", 법학연구, 30(1) (1988), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 윤용석, "현정 최재훈선생 화갑기념논문집" (1990), 현정최재훈선생화갑기념논문집간행위원회
- 윤용석, "가해자불명의 불법행위 - 분할책임의 가능성 -", 재산법연구, 21(2), pp.265~298 (2005), 한국재산법학회
- 윤용석, "영미불법행위법상의 무과실책임에 관한 새로운 동향", 재산법연구, 7(1) (1990), 한국재산법학회
- 윤용석, "위험책임의 입법론적 과제", 영남법학, 4(1-2) (1998), 영남대학교 법학연구소
- 윤용석, "위험책임분야의 민법개정안의견서에 관한 일고", 법학연구, 41(1) (2000), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 윤용석, "위험책임의 일반조항에 관한 일고찰", 법학연구, 28(1) (1985), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 이병준, "독일원자력법상의 손해배상책임", 자치연구, 10(3) (2000), 한국지방자치연구소
- 이상정, "불법행위법 개정에 관한 관견", 민사법학, (18) (2000), 대한민사법학회
- 전경운, "수질오염 위험책임", 한양법학, 8 (1997), 한양법학회
- 전경운, "환경책임법제정의 필요성과 그 내용", 환경법연구, 25(1), pp.2~80 (2003), 한국환경법학회
- 정진명, "법과 기술의 관계에 있어서 신간의 행동과 책임", 사법행정, (429) (1996), 한국사법행정학회
- Erwin Deutsch, "유전공학법상의 책임과 권리보호", 법정논총, 9 (1991), 대구대학교출판부
- Dobbs, "The Law of Torts" (2005), West Group
- Fuchs, "Deliktrecht" (2002)
- Harper, "On Torts, vol. 3" (2007)
- Kötz, "Deliksrecht" (1991)
- Koziol, "Grundriß des Bürgerlichen Rechts Band Ⅰ" (1995)
- Larenz, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Bd. Ⅱ" (1981), C.H.Beck’s
- Prosser, "On Torts" (1984), West publishing
- Sprau, "Palandt, BGH" (2005)
- U. Neumann, "Zur Veränderung von Verantwortungsstrukturen unter den Bedingungen des wissenschaftlich-technischen Fortschritts", Rechtstheorie (2005)
- "세계법제정보센터"[URL]
- "시사상식사전"[URL]
- "한국과학창의재단"[URL]