북한 협동농장 소유제도의 전환문제
The Conversion Matter of the Ownership System of Collective Farm in North Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Reason to examine the historical development of former land ownership system is to determine whether it is possible to apply the system of South Korea to the North when reorganizing the system. Noting that North Korea is currently an agriculture based nation, unified Korea should work to improve the production of agriculture industry, and for this purpose an agrarian reform is needed. Furthermore, the Agrarian Reform Act of South Korea can be a reference for establishing this purpose. This act of South Korea was enacted to improve the production of agriculture industry, but it would not be appropriate to apply this act to North Korea without any limitations because it was made to resolve unreasonable land ownership system and to distribute land dominated by a small number of landlords to tenants. Because North Korea is operating the social land ownership, private ownership is denied and there is no need for the concept of landlord. As a result, there is no land to confiscate. For these reasons, the act of South Korea cannot be applied directly. However, it is still important to discuss this matter more specifically for if only these limitations are eliminated, the problems found in the amendment of the Agrarian Reform Act can be applied to North Korea.
Abstract
The Reason to examine the historical development of former land ownership system is to determine whether it is possible to apply the system of South Korea to the North when reorganizing the system. Noting that North Korea is currently an agriculture based nation, unified Korea should work to improve the production of agriculture industry, and for this purpose an agrarian reform is needed. Furthermore, the Agrarian Reform Act of South Korea can be a reference for establishing this purpose. This act of South Korea was enacted to improve the production of agriculture industry, but it would not be appropriate to apply this act to North Korea without any limitations because it was made to resolve unreasonable land ownership system and to distribute land dominated by a small number of landlords to tenants. Because North Korea is operating the social land ownership, private ownership is denied and there is no need for the concept of landlord. As a result, there is no land to confiscate. For these reasons, the act of South Korea cannot be applied directly. However, it is still important to discuss this matter more specifically for if only these limitations are eliminated, the problems found in the amendment of the Agrarian Reform Act can be applied to North Korea.
참고문헌 (13)
- 고승효, "북한경제의 이해" (1993), 평민사
- 고승효, "조선에서의 사회주의의 건설" (1962), 신일본출판사
- 김경량, "통일후의 북한협동농장 재편방향에 관한 연구" (2005), 강원대학교
- 김상용, "토지소유권의 법사상" (1995), 민음사
- 김성욱, "한국의 통일과 토지소유제도의 재편", 비교사법, 13(4) (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 김승준, "우리나라에서 농업 협동화의 결정적 승리", 근로자, (9) (1958), ,
- 김영윤, "북한 토지소유제의 전개과정", 북한, (300) (1996), 북한연구소
- 김영윤, "소규모 협동농장과 농민시장 활성화로 농업생산성 제고해야", 북한 (2002), 북한연구소
- 법원행정처, "북한의 부동산제도" (1997), 법원행정처
- 유재의, "북한농업체계에서 분조관리제의 변화가 갖는 정치적 의미", 석사, pp.2002
- 정경모, ""북한법령집"제2권" (1990), 대륙연구소
- 최수영, "7.1조치 이후 북한의 농업개혁과 과제" (2006), 통일연구원
- 한 걸, "공화국 농업협동조합법의 발전 in 우리나라 법의 발전" (1960), 국립출판소
