본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국민참여재판의 시행상황 분석과 나아갈 방향 -최종모델 결정에 있어서의 주요쟁점 검토를 중심으로-

The Analysis of and Developmental Suggestions for the Citizen Participatory Trial

0

조회

0

다운로드

44

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In Korea, a sweeping change to the Korean criminal judicial system began through the foundation of "the Supreme Court`s Judiciary Reform Committee" in 2003. One of the accomplishments, achieved by the Judicial Reform Plan, was the enactment of "the Act on Citizen Participation of Criminal Trials". Based on the Act, Korea launched the Citizen Participatory Trial(hereinafter the Citizen Trial) as a pilot project and lay people began to participate in criminal trials for the first time in Korean history. This article aims to analyze cases of the Citizen Trial and to suggest some reform measures. PartⅠoutlines the Citizen Trial, especially focusing on legal aspects. Analyzing the cases of the Citizen Trial, Part Ⅱ describes the reality of the Citizen Trial implemented for three years(2008~2010). Part Ⅲ concerns the main disputes and discusses some reform issues on the Citizen Trial. Based on the discussion, to improve the Citizen Trial, some reform measures are suggested in the last part.

Abstract

In Korea, a sweeping change to the Korean criminal judicial system began through the foundation of "the Supreme Court`s Judiciary Reform Committee" in 2003. One of the accomplishments, achieved by the Judicial Reform Plan, was the enactment of "the Act on Citizen Participation of Criminal Trials". Based on the Act, Korea launched the Citizen Participatory Trial(hereinafter the Citizen Trial) as a pilot project and lay people began to participate in criminal trials for the first time in Korean history. This article aims to analyze cases of the Citizen Trial and to suggest some reform measures. PartⅠoutlines the Citizen Trial, especially focusing on legal aspects. Analyzing the cases of the Citizen Trial, Part Ⅱ describes the reality of the Citizen Trial implemented for three years(2008~2010). Part Ⅲ concerns the main disputes and discusses some reform issues on the Citizen Trial. Based on the discussion, to improve the Citizen Trial, some reform measures are suggested in the last part.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 사법제도개혁추진위원회, "사법제도개혁추진위원회 백서(상), 사법선진화를 위한 개혁" (2006)
  2. 대법원, "사법참여기획단 제12차 회의자료" (2011)
  3. "대법원 형사정책심의관실 보도자료", ~ (2008)
  4. 이인석, "국민참여재판의 동향과 양형", 국민의사법참여연구회 학술토론회 자료집10 (2010)
  5. 김태규, "국민참여재판의 개선방안에 대한 연구", 형사정책연구, 19(4), pp.127~156 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  6. 최재혁, "국민참여재판의 실무상 운영방안", 2009년 제1회 국민참여재판장 간담회 자료 (2009)
  7. 김상준, "세계의 배심제도" (2007), 나남
  8. 법원행정처 사법정책실, "2008년―2009년 국민참여재판 성과 분석" (2010)
  9. 법원행정처, "사법연감, 2008년․2009년․2010년"
  10. "사법통계"[URL]
  11. "서울신문", ~ (2009)
  12. 한국방송(K-TV) 국민참여재판 여론조사, , ~ (2003)
  13. 국민참여재판제도에 대한 인식조사, "사법개혁추진위원회", ~ (2005)
  14. "대법원 2009년 10월 23일자 결정 2009모1032", ~
  15. "대법원 2010년 3월 25일 2009도14065 판결", ~
  16. "일본 가고시마 노부부 강도살인사건(鹿児島老夫婦強盗殺人事件)", ~
  17. "영국 1976년 형사사법법(The Criminal AJustice Act 1976)", ~
  18. "일본 毎日新聞", ~ (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)